Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Factors led to the industrial revolution
Factors led to the industrial revolution
Factors led to the industrial revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Factors led to the industrial revolution
Introduction
The famous term, the “Great Divergence”, refers to the great progress by Western European countries and some parts of New World who overcame other comparable counterparts such as the Qing dynasty of China, Mughal Empire of India, Japan and Ottoman Empire. There have been a series of debates, researches, and studies for why industrial revolutions did not happen during the Ming/Qing dynasties. Known as the Industrial Revolution, this progress led mankind to the transition of mass producing status of machines, heavy industries and irons from hand-made productions. There is no consensus for what is the most significant factor which led to the Industrial Revolution, yet. In this paper, I described major established theories made by two famous scholars for this issue, Pomeranz and Elvin. Furthermore, I discussed other plausible explanations that might explain this controversial topic.
Briefly, Pomeranz claimed favorable access to mines with plentiful coals which were the main sources of the Industrial Revolution was the key factor for European Industrial Revolution. Pomeranz and Elvin both argued that, at the same time, Britain and Western European countries had much more efficient transportation systems which Chinese did not have at that time. Second argument made by Pomeranz was the significance of the New World. Pomeranz contended that, by overcoming ecological limitations through its exploitation on the New World, Britain could industrialize much earlier than other countries.
According to Edwards’ “On the Onset of the Industrial Revolution and its Two Types: Song China and England”, he described how the Song dynasty’s economic growth was similar with that of England during the Industrial Revolution. In that perspec...
... middle of paper ...
...ding to Pomeranz, the New World provided both valuable resources and precious metals. Also, there were huge and cheap exports of agricultural products by free-wage workers, slaves, to European countries. As colonies were located near coastal regions, transportation costs were cheap enough to keep trades.
Equilibrium Trap
Technology of Ming
Technology of Qing
Education
Existing Labor Markets
Political Environments
Natural Resources
Conclusion
References
Ronald A. Edwards. On the Onset of the Industrial Revolution and its Two Types: Song China and England. Nov 2012. http://www.econ.cuhk.edu.hk/dept/seminar/12-13/1st-term/CUHKedwards.pdf . Visited on 1st May 2014
Pomeranz Kenneth. (2002) Beyond the East-West binary: Resituating the development paths in the eighteenth century world. The Journal of Asian Studies 61 (2) 539-590. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2700300
6) Wyatt, Lee T. The Industrial Revolution. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 2009. Print. Greenwood Guides to Historic Events, 1500-1900.
Thomas S. Ashton’s The Industrial Revolution (1760–1830) looks at the early developments of Industrial Revolution during the eighteenth and nineteenth century. Ashton illustrates throughout his book the way in which the Industrialization occurred in England. Ashton meticulously looks over English’s political, economical and social elements that allowed England to Industrialize. Throughout the six chapters Ashton provides the reader with convincing evidence and makes sure England is credited in being the first to experience the phenomena of the Industrial Revolution. Ashton argues that the combination of private initiative, deregulation and free trade allowed the Industrial Revolution to flourish. Another economic scholar Ha- Joon Chang argues that free trade theory is flawed and countries that experienced an economic boom had strong government interference. Both scholars present their arguments with strong stattiscal evidence.
Pomeranz’s arguments have indeed set off a chain of responses from numerous scholars . However the summary of the book by Rosenthal and Bin Wong does reduce the qualified arguments put forth by Pomeranz. Clearly distortions produced by war propelled Europe towards urbanization and capital-using technologies several centuries before 1700. By implication, one can conclude that a competitive and innovative Europe outperformed an imperial and traditionalist
For centuries machines have fueled the functioning of our society by being the foundations of business and labor. This all started in Britain, due to the island’s abundant natural resources in coal and the country’s booming cotton industry. Although the Industrial Revolution sparked a successful economy, it lowered the quality of life for many people. Because of the Industrial Revolution, children had to labor in the factories, poor people felt they were not treated properly by the factory owners, and living spaces were polluted and taken away for the purposes of mechanization. Children were expected to work in factories in order to help provide for their families; this meant that their childhoods were taken away from them, as they had to work
O'Brien, Patrick, and Roland Quinault, eds. The Industrial Revolution and British Society. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1993. Print.
Gardner, Angela. "Emergence of East Asia to 1200." Cypress Creek High School, Orlando. Nov.-Dec. 2013. Lecture.
McCloskey, Donald, "The Industrial Revolution 1780-1860: A Survey," The Economic History of Britain Since 1700 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).
Historians have often been perplexed by the fact that the industrial revolution began in Great Britain and quickly spread throughout Europe, but did not develop in any other regions around the world, which is odd because we have seen such equally important advancements in fields like agriculture which developed in various places around the world independently because it was an important new source of energy that was needed to sustain larger communities. (2) This paper will focus on the circumstances of Great Britain how the revolution spread throughout Europe and why the revolution didn’t occur in the relatively advanced country of China.
The Age of Western Imperialism. Modern East Asia From 1600. Second Edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2009. 295-367.
English Online. (Ed.). (n.d.). The Industrial Revolution. Retrieved April 23, 2012, from English-online.com Web site: http://www.english-online.at/history/industrial-revolution/industrial-revolution-manufacturing.htm
The industrial revolution of 17th and 18th centuries saw the transformation of Britain from a Neolithic nation into an industrious nation. However, this spread quickly throughout the world, introducing the modernisation of agriculture, revolution in power and manufacturing of textile.
Edward R. Slack, from Indiana State University, wrote one of the reviews mentioned above. In the review, Slack mentioned that Pomeranz’s main argument was that England escaped Malthusianism because of “coercion, disease, luck, a bounty of resources from the colonization of the New World, feudal institutions and the partnership between state and entrepreneur in Europe (p. 495)” and these factors plus industrial revolution, which occurred a little later, is what caused the Great Divergence. Regarding Pomeranz’s methodology, Slack appreciated that he avoided distortions of scale by focusing on regions of similar population, size, and economic vitality and used a
The new invention of steam power was one of the great motives for the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, steam was used to power many of the machines, thus with the invention of steam power, the Industrial Revolution was powered onwards. The duo of inventors, Thomas Savery and Thomas Newcomen were both based in Britain, thus, this was the place where the inventions were first used giving Britain the time advantage over other countries.
The Industrial Revolution was a time of immense changes that occurred in the manufacturing process, transportation means, and economy of the agriculture, textile, and metal industries in England, turning it into “the workshop of the world”
Horn, Jeff, Leonard N. Rosenband, and Merritt Roe Smith. Reconceptualizing the Industrial Revolution. Dibner Institute Studies in the History of Science and Technology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2010.