Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Eassy on roman expansion
The expansion of the Roman empire
The expansion of the Roman empire
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Eassy on roman expansion
In 476 CE, Atilla the Hun sacked Rome, setting the once-great capital city up in flames. Historians have argued for many centuries about what caused the fall of the Roman Empire. One of five traditionally given reasons is that Rome fell because of overexpansion and military spending since it is impossible to govern an enormous empire without it descending into chaos while pumping resources into the military that took away from the city’s own infrastructure. Some others believe that Christianity and declining traditional Roman values were the primary cause of the fall of Rome. The reasoning behind this school of thought is that the rise of Christianity caused the Roman values system to collapse. Another possibility is that it was government …show more content…
For example, Caligula, who was an insane emperor who ruled with fear. After many years of abusing, taunting, and disrespecting the people of his nation, Caligula’s own Praetorian Guards could take no more and murdered him at the gladiatorial games. Despite the damage that Caligula had caused, the Roman Empire continued to expand, and under Claudius, an extremely smart and scholarly emperor, reached its greatest size. In fact, even after the moral wreckage that Caligula caused in part by his many incestuous relationships, following his death the Roman Empire was able to function as a meritocracy, a society which determines an individual’s position based on their accomplishments and capabilities rather than their wealth or the status they were born into. Rome was able to overcome insanity in the dominate by focusing on moral values and on academics. Following The Third Century Crisis, a 50 year period during which 26 emperors ruled, the Romans could have emphasized intellect in their daily lives. In fact, it would have been even easier than after Caligula’s rule because of the many new academic institutions and resources available to them. Hadrian, who ruled after Caligula at the apex of the Roman empire, raised intellectual discourse in Rome and built the Athenaeum, a world renowned library in the heart of the Roman Empire. …show more content…
Barbarian tribes invaded Rome from every frontier, relentlessly and aggressively attacking with no mercy. These attacks forced Rome to expand their army, raising military costs exponentially. Higher military expenses raised taxes as well as intensifying social tension between different classes. Affluent Roman citizens were able to pay off tax collectors and avoid paying for the enlarged military. Because of this, and since tax collectors were forced to pay out of pocket if they failed to meet their quotas, tax collectors utilized social regimentation to collect large sums of money from the poor, driving the already poor citizens even deeper into poverty. Additionally, wars were being waged with barbarians right in the center of the Roman Empire. Constant battling makes it very difficult for a civilization to function and flourish. St. Jerome, who lived at the time of the decline of the Roman Empire, observed that the vast majority of Romans had lived their lives in captivity, and did not know what it meant to be a free person living in a stable country. It is impossible for an empire to survive when its own citizens cannot even recognize what it is that they are fighting for. It was external pressures from barbarian tribes that greatly increased the tension between social classes and dissolved the rigid structure of the Roman
The Roman empire was a very large and successful empire, although like many things it had to come to an end. The three primary reasons that had most contributed to Rome's fall is foreign invasions, military weakness , and weak leadership.
The year is 476 A.D. and the Roman Empire has collapsed after being overthrown by barbarians. Looking back, the causes of Rome’s decline can be separated into four categories, social, economic, military, and political. The social aspects of Rome’s fall are the rise of christianity and civil wars. The rise of christianity displaced Rome’s polytheistic roots which viewed the emperor as having a godly status. Pope and church leaders took an increased role in political affairs which further complicated governance. Civil wars also deteriorated the empire. More than 20 men took the throne in only 75 years and the empire was thrust into chaos. The economic aspects of Rome’s fall were high taxes from the government and labor deficit. The roman empire
While these problems existed to a greater of lesser degree, since the end of the 2nd century, their effects were accelerated by the reforms of the emperors Constantine and Diocletian. These reforms changed Roman life as well as the face of the Roman army, moving it away from its classical infantry-based structure to a more cavalry-based system. The army was reorganized into lightly armed troops called "limitanei" who defended the border, and large mobile armies composed of troops called "comitatenses". The border troops were given land to live on around forts they protected. This structure led to farming becoming the job of the border troops so that they could feed as well as protect those on the frontier. Over time, this in turn led to out of date weaponry and neglect in training. The weakness of these troops meant that more mobile troops were needed to compensate, and an easily penetrable border as a result of the weakness led to the need for highly efficient mobile armies. Since the cavalry were the most mobile unit of the army, they began to be the favored military unit. With forces strung along the border and concentrated large mobile armies, an increased number of recruits were required; however, land owners were reluctant to let themselves or their kin be recruited because that left less workers for their farms. At the same time, the division of the empire into outer imperial provinces and inner provinces controlled by the Senate had its own effect. Since the armies largely remained in the outer imperial provinces, the people of the inner provinces were out of touch with the army and were no longer attracted to service, again reducing the available pool of recruits. One reason that many avoided Army service was because Roman citizenship was now offered freely, where in prior times military service had been a path to citizenship. The result was less manpower available for Rome. The Roman army was left with no choice but to recruit barbarians, who could in this way both find employment where they had no skills, and hope to obtain Roman citizenship.
There were also terrible disasters that happen naturally such as plagues, famine, and earthquakes that would occur. This all means that more spending to fix things had to happen on top of that when Rome didn't have a lot of money due to the huge amount of money going towards the army. These natural disasters did not happen often or frequently but they happen enough to be one of the reason for the fall of Rome.
Religion is a huge part of Rome’s structure. But when conflicts of religions surfaced, failure rose. Religion may not seem like a huge issue, but actually, it is one of the biggest problems known in history. This, along with poor leaders and urban decay, has contributed to the decline of Rome. Without a strong leader, there is no empire.
Because Rome had grown massively, the government had to inflate many prices and impose mass taxation to pay
The Roman Empire was able to extend its boarders and create a civilization based on the cultural belief that they were the civilized people and all others were barbarians. Though many of the people in Rome were not well educated the elites in the Empire “would pass from forum to forum, s...
One of the main reasons for Rome’s fall was the collapse of its social order. The chief and best known argument for this is that Rome’s citizens lost their sense of civic responsibility, and became socially decadent, and that the economic interests of the Romans compromised their social stability. He summarizes this by saying “private enterprise, left to itself, was proving unequal to the task of feeding the civilian population” (Walbank 72). Many Roman authors also believed Romes collapse was a result of moral decay (Augustinus) This...
For a long period of time, Rome seemed like an unstoppable empire. It conquered the majority of the land surrounding it, including Greece, Turkey, Iraq, and many of its other neighboring countries. It seemed as though Rome would conquer the entire world, as it was the center of it, until it began to decline in 476 C.E. The very aspects that made it so successful were the ones that caused its collapse. Various political, religious, and economic reasons caused its downfall. The fact that the entire economy of Rome collapsed and money became worthless was a major reason for the empire’s collapse. In addition, the loss of a common religion and lack of efficient ruling in relation to its vast territory affected the empire. The Roman Empire did not become so successful in a short period of time, and so its decline did not just happen overnight. Over several years all of these different aspects together caused the fall of the Roman Empire.
Rome was a major power because it always made certain its own military prowess was preeminent. There have been many ideas presented as to the fall of the Roman Empire. Many believe that Rome declined morally and the violence and decadence of the societal norms led to the demise. Gibbons has been credited with the theory of the influence and transference of Christianity over the Roman system of Gods and Goddesses that perpetrated the fall. Another theory lays the blame at the feet of the Emperor, that the happiness of the people and the functioning of the government was directly correlated with the personal merit and management skills of the reigning authority. This 10 page paper argues that the imperialistic tendencies of Rome over time and the pre-eminence of military expansionism in the latter stages, was the deciding feature of the "fall". Bibliography lists 7 sources.
Romans were civilized with rule of law, innocent until proven guilty, etc. These concepts were unreal to the barbarians. They detected the military impotence, of the Romans, and exploited it to establish their own kingdoms. " Thus the political entity knows as the Roman Empire came to an end, and the Germanic kingdoms of Western Europe began to flourish. " In conclusion, there were many factors which influenced the fall of Rome.
Zora Neale Hurston: A Reflection and Departure from the Harlem Renaissance Zora Neale Hurston stands as a towering figure in American literature. Her work, particularly the iconic novel Their Eyes Were Watching God, reflects the artistic and cultural movement known as the Harlem Renaissance. Yet Hurston's voice also carves a distinct path, offering a special and different perspective on the Black experience that both complements and challenges the prevailing themes of the era. This essay will explore how Hurston's writing embodies the core principles of the Harlem Renaissance while at the same time departing from its conventions, ultimately leaving a lasting mark on American literature.
An Empire that is too big is not always for the better because there are more problems to be dealt with. In the case of the Roman E...
The Roman Empire was incredibly large and successful. In the prime of the empire population reached up to 56.8 million people. The land they conquered amasses to an outrageous 1 million square miles. Their influence is so great that even now people can see their imprint in architecture, law, and even helping spread Christianity, the world’s most populous religion. These amazing facts also begs a question. How did one of the world’s greatest civilization fall? Well, the fall of Roman Empire in 476 ACE was aided by ineffective rulers, the crumbling economy, and the invasion of the Germanic Tribes.
In order for the Romans to invade and conquer other provinces, they had to spend heavily on their legions. The Roman armies and supply lines became over-stretched resulting in thousands of soldiers being recruited and deployed from Rome into other territories as invaders or defenders. They also depended on soldiers to defend the borders of the lands they had conquered from barbarian attacks which resulted in the increased manufacturing of weapons and more money being spent on soldiers. High military spending left the Romans with very limited resources for other essential government projects such as the building of more public houses and the development of roads and aqueducts as well as leading to inflation. The over-expenditure on the military led the citizens of Rome to refuse the policies and laws enforced by the government and riots were commonplace in Rome during its last century.... ...