Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gerrymandering process
Gerrymandering process
Gerrymandering political science flashcards
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Gridlock has been around for centuries in Congress, and I don’t see it changing anytime soon. Gridlock refers to the inaction of the government and failure to make a decision or legislative law that satisfy the needs of the people. Gridlock occurs when two parties cannot agree on a single matter, and they cannot come to a good agreement on how or when the law is going to be passed thus leaving a pressing issue in the nation unhandled and doing nothing about it. An example of gridlock would be one of the nation’s pressing problems – social security. It is currently headed towards never being solved. Congress has done absolutely nothing, and if this fiscal disaster does not get fixed, it could seriously hurt America for the worst. Gridlock …show more content…
One of the reasons for congressional gridlock is gerrymandering. Gerrymandering is manipulating the boundaries to favor one’s party or class. Gerrymandering creates elected officials who have ideological extremes who use utmost legislative strategies that cause gridlock. Essentially, only citizens can stop gerrymandering and truly restore democratic elections, which is crucial for our democratic elections, including Congress. One solution to ending gridlock is to reduce gerrymandering. Reducing gerrymandering can be done by having commissions re-district after the decennial Census. Another cause of gridlock is the way our government is set up. Our government is unusually structured in a complicated way that combines all of these different concepts that prevent one branch of government from having too much say in certain policy matters and other important governmental decisions, such as law-making. This makes it nearly impossible to come to a legislation agreement in a decent amount of time. (Shep, 3) Gridlock is also caused by representative dynamics. Representative dynamics refers to times when each organization is advanced by someone else just to be in their favor. While other representatives are open to sitting down and working out problems, their constituents are discouraging them. This can be fixed by getting to the root cause of representatives leading in service of only their own interests rather than to follow their …show more content…
After the Newton, CT incident, people all around the country were – and still are – hopeful something will get accomplished regarding gun violence. They preach that the Congress needs to work on the laws to make it so that there are more background checks to make it even harder for criminals and mentally ill to acquire guns and assault weapons. “Gun injuries cause twice as many deaths as cancer, and they account for 6,570 deaths of children and young people.” (Dinan, 4) This is a staggering statistic. Knowing this, Congress should be on gun laws more than ever during this time to fix it, but Congress has yet to have done something about it. Even though there were four amendments proposed about gun laws, only one was actually approved because the Senate refuses to acknowledge the gun trouble and has become so terribly dysfunctional that every vote now requires a 60-vote threshold. Since this has happened and there was a failure to reach a super-majority threshold, this underlying bill was withdrawn from further consideration. Since Senate rules, a minority was able to block it from moving forward. As a result, the Senate cannot move forward, and the bill has, in all actuality, been basically eliminated from the Senate
Mann and Norman J. Ornstein argue that the Legislative branch is the most broken branch of government. Congress was designed by the Framers of the Constitution of the United States to be an independent and powerful party. The Framers wanted the Legislative branch to represent the vast diversity of people of the United States, to deliberate on important issues and policies, and to check and balance the other branches. However, Congress’s role in the American Constitutional System differs from the part it was meant to play. The authors argue that Congress has failed to fill its responsibilities to the people of the United States because of the division of the Democratic and Republican parties, which leaves little room for compromise and negotiation. Members of Congress focus on their own needs and interests, and will travel to far lengths to prove that their political party is the most powerful. Congress has turned a blind eye to the needs of the American people. Congress cannot succeed in getting the United States back on track unless they start to follow the rules dictated by the Framers of the Constitution. A vast series of decisions made by Congress, driven by Congress’s disregard for institutional procedures, its tendency to focus on personal ethics, and the overpowering culture of corruption, led to Congress failing to implement important changes in the United States
According to the The Atlantic website, efforts to promote gun control are renewed after tragedies occur; they then quickly vanish. As stated, “We don 't yet know if today 's tragedy in Connecticut will spark a national debate over gun control, or whether, like many massacres before it, it will fade quietly without leaving its mark on a single law” (Thompson). Derek Thompson cites a study by Ezra Klein reporting about ninety five people in favor of background checks being revised. The chart to the left shows that there are multiple gun control policies; ranking the highest are background checks. Many potential policies are taken into account when deciding which policy would have an ongoing positive outcome.
Jessica, Rettig. 2010. “Galston: Mandatory Voting Would Loosen Partisan Gridlock.” US News, July 8 http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2010/07/08/galston-mandatory-voting-would-loosen-partisan-gridlock (March 8).
...ilities of Congress is that minorities and factions exist: dissent takes place, not disagreements. Verbal brawls take place rather than actual argumentation, and that is what kills democracy. That is why things never get done.
Tragedy after tragedy, people find themselves mourning over the lives lost. And over and over again, they look back to see how they could have prevented it. People continue to argue and constantly debate what actions should be taken, and while doing so, more and more people lose their lives at the hands of gun violence. It’s clear to see that not much has been done to keep these weapons out of the wrongs hands: the shootings at Columbine High School and Virginia Tech have shown that. What would happen if there were to be another devastating shooting to occur? How would people react? Or would they just argue some more, while the wrong people can still easily get a hold of guns? The only way they can ever gain control of anything is by controlling the source of the problem, where people are able to freely purchase guns without restrictions. In order to reduce gun-related crime, unlicensed gun sellers should be required to run background checks on their customers.
These desires interact with one another in different ways, giving rise to the need for different strategies employed by members of House and Senate. When members' reelection needs and personal policy preferences are similar within the party and differ substantially between parties, as we see in a highly polarized Congress, it makes sense for them to organize their parties and endow their leaders with the resources necessary to facilitate the achievement of their goals. Scholars have argued that the contemporary parties are elaborately organized so as to facilitate joint action toward collective goals, while also providing members with much-prized opportunities to participate in the legislative process. An increased reliance over the past three decades on special rules in the House to achieve legislative goals rather than compromise and negotiation has become the norm, rather than the
This is the dysfunctional aspect of gridlock. Studying the reasons behind dysfunction, the implications of this dysfunction, and how it impacts the rest of the nation politically and socially has become one of the best ways to study Congress because it has defined Congress for years. Many of these theories, like Congress itself, disagree with each other and look at different sides of the same coin in many instances. By looking at these theories and what they say, it will help everyone better understand how Gridlock has shaped the politics of the nation, and just the nation itself. Political Polarization is one of the most widely accepted causes of political gridlock, as the two sides continue to drift further and further apart.
In the United States of America, there are a number of national issues that go unresolved and become more of a major issue subsequently. The lack of resolution in some of our nation’s most critical issues is due to the lack of a common ground between opposing political parties. Issues such as healthcare, climate change, abortion, same-sex marriage, taxes and welfare are reoccurring problems in the United States due to congressional gridlock. The cause of congressional gridlock can be attributed to the difference in liberal and conservative views, which can be further examined through some of the nation’s most prominent reoccurring issues such as immigration and gun control.
Whether political polarization is good or bad for the nation is still up for debate, but the general consensus is it exists due to a variety of reasons. From the construction of our Constitution, it is clear that the intent of our founding fathers was to create opposition in order to prevent tyranny from prevailing. Polarization is a result of the dividing of a nation into political parties. Though polarization has fluctuated throughout the years, it has caused a great deal of trouble in regards to passing legislation and has resulted in a gridlocked Congress. Even though some fear congressional polarization is destined to get worse, “it is mathematically impossible for congress to get much more polarized” than it is now.
This past summer, when I lived and worked in Washington, DC—first as a U.S. Senate Page and then as a Congressional Intern—I gained invaluable experience and insight to the American political system. It is amazing how much one can learn from simply overhearing the conversations of Members of Congress on a daily basis. Working on the floor of the Senate and then in the back rooms of a Congressional office were two entirely different experiences, each teaching me in a distinctive way about how our political system functions. While I most definitely became aware of how bureaucratic and slow our democratic system can be, I also discovered that with a commitment to unity and prosperity for the common good, great feats are attainable through government.
With all the shootings and random acts of violence, such as the shooting at the movie theatre in Colorado, or the Sandy Hook shootings, stricter gun control laws have been a hot topic in politics and the national mainstream media. The government thinks that gun control being stricter would help to make less of these tragic incidents occur. I am against this thought because I believe that the law-abiding citizens will be the only ones to give up their guns and criminals will then have an upper hand on the innocent. Even though banning guns is supposed to save lives, cities such as Chicago have already shown that stricter gun laws should not be passed because violent murders are still prevalent in these types of cities and stricter gun laws have not worked like they were supposed to. Stricter gun laws simply will not work because the law-abiding citizens will be the only ones to follow the rules.
Gun violence in the United States is higher than ever, and criminals with guns will “…kill as many as 1000 people each day” (Alpers&Wilson). Taking this into perspective, it is only right to fight fire with fire or, in this case, use a gun to protect yourself and those around you. Gun control does not only decrease the ability for protection, it also decreases our rights as U.S citizens. The constitution clearly states that we are given the right to bear arms, meaning we may carry fire arms. Even if we have stricter laws for guns, it will not stop killers from shooting innocent people. These men and women causing damage to the lives of numerous individuals do not care if there is a law banning guns, because all they truly want to do is hurt others. The pain citizens endure every day from losing a family member, friend, or even just a colleague is repulsive. These permanent deaths continue to make people fearful and it causes damage in their lives; unless something is done. Most people agree that action needs to be taken to stop this inhumane cruelty, but the question is; what can be done? Americans need protection, rights, and power to break this inexcusable gun violence circling America. Gun restrictions for trustworthy and reliable gun owners have not been proven to weaken gun violence in the United States; therefore, gun control should be limited because it is only hurting America, not helping it.
Congressional gridlock is when nothing is being accomplished by congress. One of the major causes for this is a lack of compromise from both parties of congress. There is no give or take from either side of congress. Most issues have two totally different views or sides taken by each party. Each view is an opinion on the subject, and usually people do not realize that there are no right or wrongs in opinion, that is why we call them opinions. People need to learn to agree to disagree with people and respect other opinions. Having respect for others and their opinions allows us to see their side of things. Having the ability to see the other side does not mean you agree with them, it shows the ability to see other sides of the argument and get
The Brady Campaign to Prevent Violence reports “On average, 32 Americans are murdered with guns every day and 140 are treated for a gun assault in an emergency room” (Lunceford 1). This is an alarming rate of unnecessary deaths; voting Americans need to view this as a public health issue that needs to be addressed logically, much like obesity or motor vehicle accidents. In previous health crisis campaigns such as drunk driving, the goal was to prevent the danger before it ever happened; this is the way we need to look at gun control in America, making it a priority to vote, and elect the right public officials who will make gun safety their goal in public
The debate over gun control in America has constantly brought up over the years due to gunmen killing large amounts of civilizations in shootings. From Columbine to Sandy Hook or the shootings of the two reporters in West Virginia, these public shootings are occurring everywhere. Lawmakers and civilians alike are pushing for increased gun control in hopes of preventing the same tragedies. Anybody that has been affected by the shootings have been pushing Congress and state governments to force new sanctions on government. With the past three years, Congress has shot down all the laws despite the large amounts of public support. Adding more gun control isn’t going to stop the mass shootings from happening.