Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
St bartholomew's day massacre essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Imagine walking down the street to see a group of people talking about you. Would you say something to stop it or would you just ignore it? The Saint Bartholomew Massacre was an unpleasant bloody massacre that started on August 24-25, 1572. The Catholics were going to attack the French Protestants in France. This massacre lasted for about two days which caused many people to lose their lives. The causes, events of the massacre, and the terrible effects it had on people makes the Saint Bartholomew Day Massacre one of the most horrible crimes in history.
There are many causes that led up to the start of the St. Bartholomew Massacre. First, on August 22, Catherine de Medici was mad because the Protestant leader, Coligny, was trying to convince
…show more content…
her son to send troops to the Protestants. Catherine became angrier and wanted Coligny assassinated (Diefendorf). Diefendorf states that Catherine de Medici did not really get along with Coligny and he encouraged her son, Charles. Secondly, both Hitchcock and Edmund states that the choice by Queen Catherine de Medicis to persecute the Protestants caused the massacre to start. In the beginning, Coligny and Catherine did not like each other because of the two different religions they both believed in. According to the article “Massacre of St. Bartholomew’s Day,” on August 24-25,1572 in Paris, Catherine de Medici and the Roman Catholic nobles plotted the Protestants. In August, Catherine and he Protestants went to war to only have one religion in France. The issues between Catherine and Coligny was another cause of the massacre starting.
Huguenot leader, Admiral Gaspard II de Coligny encouraged a war in the low countries against Spain from the reopening of civil war. The French King, Charles IX approved it in the summer of 1572 (“Massacre of St. Bartholomew Day”). During the summer Catherine’s son, Charles was okay of the civil war starting again. Next, Catherine de Medici’s son King Charles IX of France wanted the Huguenot Protestant leaders in Paris murdered. All the killing is the outcome of the massacre leads to many of the Protestants getting killed all around France (“Saint Bartholomew Day”). Another cause that led up to the massacre is the French Wars on Religion were going to last with not many calm times until 1598 Treaty of Vervins along with Henry IV's, Edict of Nantes. Both established restricted freedom of religion in the country. In 1559, Queen Catherine de Medici made the choice to execute any leading Protestants (Hitchcock and Edmund). Catherine did not want any Protestants who believed in a different religion as her so she thought it was a good idea to excite all of them. According to one source, “Saint Bartholomew Day” “Catherine had ordered the murder of Admiral Gaspard de Coligny, a Huguenot leader, whom she felt was leading her son into war with Spain”. When Coligny was murdered the Huguenots lost one of their greatest leaders when they needed him the most. In closing, these causes had an impact to the …show more content…
massacre which made it one of the terrifying places to be during this time. There are several events that happened in the St.
Bartholomew Massacre. To begin with, on the night of August 23, there was a secret meeting held in the Louvre, a palace in France, to remove the Huguenot leader (Diefendorf). When the bell rang of Saint Germain’l Auxerois the massacre began before dawn on August 24 (“Massacre of St.Bartholomew”). When the massacre began the Catholics first wanted to kill the the Huguenot leader then other Protestant followers.The Massacre began on August 24-25 1572 in Paris, France. Many civil wars broke out between the forces of Catholics and Protestants in 1562 in France. Another name for these series of wars are called the French Wars on Religion (Hitchcock and Edmund). These many wars are called the French Wars on Religion because they happened in France and arguing about what religion France should be.According to the article, “ Impact of Saint Bartholomew” France was broken up between Catholics and Protestants. These two types of religions caused problems between the two because Huguenots were followers of Jean Calvin, but the Catholics were not.Then, in a cathedral called Notre Dame in Paris Henry of Navarre, a Huguenot leader, married King Charles IX sister, Margaret of Valois (Manetsch). After Coligny was murdered, Huguenot leaders were shot and killed by their enemies using swords. Many of the leaders tried to escape from the disaster because they were still trying to wake up from their sleep (Manetsch). “The homes and ships if
Huguenots were pillaged and their occupants brutally murdered; many bodies were thrown into the Seine. Bloodshed continued in Paris even after a royal order of August 25 to stop the killing, and it spread to the provinces. Huguenots in Rouen,Lyon,Bourges,Orleans and Bordeaux were among the victims.” (“Massacre of St. Bartholomew Day”). The quote explains how terrible this massacre was and many of the Huguenots lives were after this day. In conclusion, all of these horrible events that happened on Saint Bartholomew's Day will not be forgotten
The Edict of Nantes had given Protestants, or Huguenots, in France the ability to practice their religion without fear of violence or persecution. Enacted in the late 1500s in an effort to resemble France after the destruction of the French Wars of Religion, the Edict of Nantes served as a means to unite the French population and end the violence that often accompanied religious persecution. Louis’ decision to revoke such a peace-promoting edict, in an effort to homogenize his country and align his subjects with his own beliefs, clearly illustrates his giving of priority to his own agenda, as opposed to that which would best benefit his country. However, while the claim that the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes was detrimental to French society, seems to be disproven by Doc 6, which essentially asserts that the king’s revocation has resulted in the rapid conversion of “whole towns” and describes the king as “the invincible hero destined to… destroy the terrible monster of heresy”, the author’s inherently biased point of view must be addressed. This description, which could be used as evidence to support the fact that Louis did act in interest of the state, must be taken with a grain of salt as the author himself, a member of the Assembly of the Clergy, does not even have the best interest of the state in mind; rather, he is
In September 1791, France achieved the movement of freeing and outlawing slavery. In turn, Haitian slaves were inspired to do the same by revolting against French plantation owners. This transformative movement of 100,000 slaves was led by Toussaint L’Ouverture; unfortunately, he died before experiencing Haiti’s separation from France in 1804. However, along the way of success of both revolutions, a toll occurred on the numerous lives lost. The Reign of Terror in France was created as a way to protect the republic from its internal enemies, but instead 16,000 people were guillotined. Many documents were shown to be describing the execution of the Reign of Terror to be gruesome and wrongful such that J.G. Milligen stated, “The process of execution was also a sad and heartrending spectacle”, in The Revolutionary Tribunal. Milligen continued to describe the vivid scene of the execution, but this was only one event and many others have died in the fall of the Bastille and the attack on the royal palace. Haiti has also lost many lives as an outcome of the revolutions especially in the slave revolts and battles with French soldiers sent by Napoleon. In addition, the Haitian Revolution leader L’Ouverture died in captivity in France. Both of these revolutions were known to have successfully achieved its goals, but it was chaotic and
making laws that abolish christianity is insane and trying to control an individual’s religion is very unfair and controlling for the new french government to do. Abolishing Sunday worship, Christmas, and Easter is a horribly crude thing for a revolutionary to do (Doc. C). France Representatives also took a cropper crucifix which was on the altar and carried it mockingly, upside down on a cart, offering it to passers-by to sit on (Doc. C). In Vendee, historians estimate that anywhere between 80,000 and 500,000 French people on both sides died in 1793 (Doc. C). Townspeople fought fiercely against a military draft called levee en masse and against laws to try to abolish Christianity in France (Doc. C). These pieces of evidence display that the Reign of Terror was in no way
...t to the accusations brought under the new Martin Guerre. Jean de Coras was proven to have had Protestant ties, and was eventually killed for them. (100) However, he was also a very learned, educated, and passionate man with an upstanding career in law and, after the case of Martin Guerre, the literary world. The idea that someone of so high a rank embraced the new religion shows that its influence at the time cannot be ignored.
The massacre also affected society and the knowledge that no place is safe from people like James Holmes. I do not think that insanity should be a legitimate defense for Holmes, and agree with the court verdict that he was of sound mind during the massacre. I hope that while serving his time, James can receive the help he so needs through psychiatric help and
One of the darkest times in American history was the conflict with the natives. A “war” fought with lies and brute force, the eviction and genocide of Native Americans still remains one of the most controversial topics when the subject of morality comes up. Perhaps one of the most egregious events to come of this atrocity was the Sand Creek Massacre. On the morning of November 29th, 1864, under the command of Colonel John Chivington, 700 members of the Colorado Volunteer Cavalry raped, looted, and killed the members of a Cheyenne tribe (Brown 86-94). Hearing the story of Sand Creek, one of the most horrific acts in American History, begs the question: Who were the savages?
On February 8th, 1968, shots were fired on a crowd of civil rights protesters and that day became known as one of the saddest days in South Carolina history. Many problems occurred in South Carolina, mostly between blacks and whites over issues about civil rights and segregation. These issues in South Carolina lasted many years and led to many events, protests, and even massacres that all resulted in sometimes very horrible outcomes but also bringing South Carolina one step further to getting rid of segregation. One horrible event that took place in the late 60’s was the Orangeburg Massacre that resulted in a few deaths and some injuries but also furthered integration in Orangeburg. In 1968, due to the conflict between civil rights protestors
On the 29th o April, 1977 Captain Cook, commander of a British fleet, landed on the eastern shore of Australia, in an attempt to claim the land under the name of Britain. The land was to be claimed by Britain as a land where the British government could send convicts; in an attempt to ease the struggle in the over flowing prisons. Upon Cooks arrival, he was ordered to follow three rules of claiming a foreign land. They were;
Louis' reign brought large economic gain and severe economic recession. He was the first king to embrace mercantilism in his country as the form of economy. Unfortunately, Louis was a devout Catholic, and ruined his economy with one move. He revoked the Edict of Nantes, the document that said that Huguenots could worship Protestantism in peace. This infuriated the Huguenots, and they left with their skills. By the loss of 200,000 skilled workers and business leaders, France's income dropped.
France' takeover is mostly due to Henry's accepting advice from the bishops who had a motive for their judgment. In Act 1, Scene 1, Henry is promised a large sum of money by the Church to help fund his takeover of France. In order for Henry to receive the money he would have to vote against a certain bill that the bishops, Ely and Canterbury find obstructive to the Church. Soon, Henry goes to Ely and Canterbury to help him decide whether it's alright for him to take over France under Salic law. Clearly, Ely, and Canterbury would have a good reason to suggest Henry take France since he would have to accept the Church's money, and thus vote against the bill. Canterbury tells Henry he should pursue the take over arguing that it is illegal for France to use the Salic law since it originated in Germany. As well, he argues that the manner in which previous French kings have claimed the throne would have been in violation of the law. So with this argument Henry decides to go ahead with taking over France. The problem is that Henry's decision was motivated by a goal of the Church. A decision that holds thousands of lives at stake is decided on so one group of people could benefit.
The Boston Massacre was an event that only strengthened colonial America’s hatred toward the British nation. People could answer the question of whether or no the Boston Massacre was truly a massacre differently. In my mind, yes, it was a massacre, I believe this because in the dictionary it states that a massacre is, “The unnecessary, and indiscriminate killing of a large number of human beings or animals.” I would have to say five people is a large number of human beings to kill in one sitting.
The Boston Massacre was a critical point in American history and fueled the American Revolution. It caused the Royal Governor to evacuate the occupying British troops from Boston. The Boston Massacre united the colonies in their fight for independence which, along with continued propaganda, led to the Revolutionary War.
The night of March 5th in Boston, Massachusetts took place was a horrific massacre brought on by the british soldiers. The British were not happy about the Americans decision to rebel against the new changes being made for Americans. The American Colonists rebel against the British because the colonists had been denied their rights. Prior to the night of the Massacre the british had also put in place multiple new taxes on the American colonies, these changes that were established were the result of this terrible massacre.
In the roaring twenties, the life of organized crimes was at its peak. What was the greatest mob hit ever pulled off in history? Well I'll tell you. It all happened on Valentines Day, the morning of February 14th, 1929. This incident was call, "The St. Valentines Day Massacre". The man behind this infamous crime was none other than, the infamous Al "Scarface" Capone. Al Capone was the all time greatest mobster of all time. The idea of organized crime fascinates me in so many ways. Capone was the only person to have pulled off such a crime. Al Capone was top gangster in Chicago and was one of the greatest members of the Italian Mafia and George "Bugs" Moran was the leader of the Irish/German mafia and he was the main target behind this hit. He targeted Capone because Al Capones had a bounty on his head, $60,000,000, and found George Moran as a threat. George was Capone's biggest threat of all. He needed to take him out quickly. (Al Capone, True Crime Story). Writing this paper will let me learn a lot more about this massacre. There is one question I would like answered, "Why hadn't Moran's crew made an attempt to fight back?" (Al Capone, True Crime Story). Moran's men had a long history of being violent with others. This is one question that we will never know. My most used source on this essay will be internet information and a book. I feel these sources will give me the most amount of information. Using a magazine will too but it was very hard to find a 20's magazine article.
They entered a war amongst each other because lower class was challenging the government, which concluded to many people fleeing France to go to Britain and Austria. The king of France, Louis XVI, was charged with treason and guillotined, causing the Reign of Terror, which took place when Maximilien de Robespierre tried to kill over 17000 men and women. As the country of France was declining in government and economy General Napoleon Bonaparte crowned himself emperor and fifteen years after the French Revolution, France was ruled under a dictatorship (“French Revolution”). The French Revolution was inspired by the Enlightenment and Declaration of Independence because just as the Americans, the French had been fighting for freedom from the monarchy for not supporting the country of France during a period of debt. The Revolution was based from the ideas of both the Enlightenment and the Declaration of Independence derived from John Locke’s ideals of government. This includes how the people should have a representative in the government and if they are unhappy with the government, they are able to break away to start a new one. In the end, the French had lost the Revolution by having a democratic government, which later transcended into a dictatorship (“Enlightenment