Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical issues on cloning
Genetic technologies will affect our life
The moral questions of cloning
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical issues on cloning
Need more time?
Picture a world where every baby is born healthy and everyone could live longer and healthier lives. Genetic engineering and cloning would let this almost perfect world to happen. Humans around the world could be free from deadly diseases and dying young. Genetic engineering according to Merriam- Webster, is applied techniques of genetics and biotechnology used to cut up and join together genetic material and especially DNA from one or more species of organism and to introduce the result into an organism in order to change one or more of its characteristics. A clone is defined as a person or thing that appears to be an exact copy of another person or thing. Cloning and genetic engineering will not only help humans, but it will
…show more content…
also help the dying environment around us. Even though cloning and genetic engineering are often perceived as unethical because it is messing with the “natural” human body. Cloning and genetic engineering are actually beneficial to the human race and the environment. The pros of cloning and genetic engineering are that it allows humans to live longer and healthier lives. Every day in hospitals people die because they did not receive a specific organ in time or the organ they needed was not available. Cloning important organs are beneficial to these patients, so we can give them a chance to live. Also using genetic engineering, doctors could find deadly diseases in babies before they were born and could easily genetically engineer the baby’s DNA to make the baby healthy once again. Making the decision to save your baby’s life, your family member’s life, or your life should be as easy as 123. Using both cloning and genetic engineering, the whole human race would live longer and healthier lives. Another pro of cloning is helping the animals in our environment, “Cloning could also be used to augment the number of members of an endangered species to that critical level necessary for group survival” (Gaylin 222). Cloning almost extinct animals like polar bears could give them a better chance of survival on Earth. Also, using genetic engineering we could fabricate these polar bears to be faster and stronger to ensure their survival. Also, another pro of genetic engineering is being able to manipulate everyday food to the best possible genetic strain of that type of food. For example, we could genetically modify each chicken’s DNA strain to create chickens that are healthier for us to consume and take out any harmful diseases chickens may carry and transfer to humans. With the help of genetic engineering and cloning our world, our environment, our food, our babies, our families will be healthier. The cons of genetic engineering and cloning is people would live too long and some people might find cloning as unethical.
If people lived for over a hundred years, they would be no change in the political office. In the story, Caught in the Organ Draft, there is a world where people are drafted to donate their organs to ensure the elders live longer and healthier lives. Since the younger people are forced to donate to the elders, “... We could hope that our crazy old leaders would die off or at least retire for reasons of health, stumbling away to their country villas with ulcers or shingles or scabies or scruples and allowing the new young peacemakers to take office. But now they just go on and on, immortal and insane, our senators, our cabinet members, our generals, our planners” (Silverburg 3). With the cloning of different organs, people may almost become immortal and evil leaders that run countries may never die out. The world may overpopulate and run out of resources to support everyone on Earth. Also, some people may say that cloning is unethical because it messes with the natural body or God’s “will”. In the article, Gayin, the author, proposes an important question, “And if we do attempt human cloning, what will we do with the “debris”, the discarded messes along the line? (Gaylin 224). The “debris” refers to the failed cloning attempts of cloning human body parts. Since they are human parts, would it be murder if we killed them? Many people argue that cloning is unethical because scientists would be obligated kill the messed up clones since nobody has perfected the art of cloning. Also, people argue it’s unethical because scientists are simply messing with the “will” of
god. In conclusion, the line that we should not cross is making an exact clone of a human being. Scientists should only be allowed to clone human organs or body parts. Also, people should not be offered human clones to replace their place in the world so they can run away from their everyday lives. Genetic engineering also should not be used to modify adults and kids to be faster and stronger. Scientists should only use genetic engineering and cloning of humans for deadly health conditions only. Many people find genetic engineering and cloning to be unethical, but the countless pros of cloning and genetic engineering is too beneficial to the human race to pass up.
What if there was a world with clones? There would be a way to live for up to 100 years effortlessly, have easy transplants, and maintain a precise memory. But, the recipient would be taking organs from someone else. "So what", he or she may justify, "they're clones, they are inferior. They don't matter because they are stupid." But what if someone had the power to allow them to be of normal intelligence? He or she might think that he or she is doing the clone a favor, but when the clone is killed for spare parts it's an even worse situation than with a retarded clone. Not for this "bandido" (Farmer 37). El Patron is a cruel, selfish, heartless man who clawed his way to power in his youth and rules people with fear, though he is powerful, he is always nagged by the fact that he may lose everything. There is no way on earth he would let that happen.
Understanding the facts as well as procedures between the many different types of cloning is very crucial. When everything boils down there are three types of cloning known as DNA cloning, therapeutic cloning and reproductive cloning. DNA cloning is the copying of a gene in order to transfer it into another organism which is usually used by farmers in most of their crops. Therapeutic cloning is the use of stem cells used to help take the place of whatever cell is missing which is potentially used to help the ill. Stem cells contain the potential to grow and help replace the genes that are missing in order to fix whatever is genetically wrong with your body or any genes that you may be missing. Reproductive cloning actually produces a living animal from only one parent. The endless possibilities and perhaps hidden motives of using genetic engineering are what divide as well as destroy the scientific community’s hope for passing laws that are towards pro cloning. Many people within soci...
If we are not responsible for biotechnology and cloning, human nature can be altered into a new type of “human” or rather we will create something inhuman. Modern day biotechnology and cloning are advancing so quickly that it brings concern to human nature. With the rapid advancements, life may be able to be prolonged for eternity. Some argue that because cloning stem cells is beneficial to humanity, it is ethical.
From genetic engineering scientist were able to come with a reproductive medicine to help women who could not have kids, conceive and bear children(Designer baies,para.1).Genetic engineering could also help wipe out some of the most serve diseases among babies. For instant, Cystic Fibrosis is a deadly disease with no cure but through genetic engineering it can be cured (Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering,par.1). Using genetic engineering for this purpose allow for babies to be healthy and strong, which is more important than the looks of the child.This also allows for not only more babies, but for them to live longer by curing
...hat is going to be saved is important, the clones are as important also. People die every day so instead of taking the rights of the people that are alive, it is better to take the right of the ones that are already dead and use their organs to save people. If using dead people’s organ is not enough then we can work on creating artificial organs that will work like the original one because cloning for donation is not an option.
The primary goal of genetic engineering is to predict and cure genetic disorders by changing an organism's genome using biotechnology. This is done by a nucleotide insertion or deletion that changes genetic abnormalities that’s called Therapeutic and Reproductive Cloning. Therapeutic cloning has benefits in treating various diseases through cell replication used to create organs. Reproductive cloning focuses on creating limbs, reproducing copies of human beings and designing phenotypical properties of babies before they are born. This review will compare and contrast the pros and cons of genetic manipulation through an in depth analysis of 2 articles; the first article is for a popular health website and the second article
Genetic Engineering is deleting or adding different types for DNA that have different characteristics, and then adding them to a embryo to produce a specific organism. Cloning is where you move cells from the original embryo and place them into another one to produce the same organism. Genetech was the first company to first start experimenting with this new science in 1981. Gregor Mendel was the first scientist to discover this new science he called Genetics. At the time this company was valued at $200 million. Research for this t...
Cloning is vital in American society because it will help us further our knowledge in genetics. Also cloning will make us realize how much scientists can actually accomplish knowing how to clone. Scientists were able to clone an animal in 1997. That accomplishment made all the scientist’s theories about cloning possible. It gave the scientists hope that one day they will maybe be able to clone a human because they were able to clone a mammal. Eugenics is also vital to American society. Eugenics is the practice of improving human’s genetic quality of the human population as a whole. Cloning plays a huge role in science. It’s all about genetics and DNA and what humans can do to further our knowledge with the human anatomy. Not all people agree with cloning and eugenics like some scientists do which causes a lot of controversy.
"The aim is to decrease the fear of a brave new world and to encourage people to be more proactive about their health. It [Gene therapy] will help humans become better physically and even mentally and extend human life. It is the future” (Hulbert). Dr. Hulbert, a genetic engineer, couldn’t be anymore right; more time, money, and research needs to be put into gene therapy and genetic engineering, since it can cure certain illness and diseases that are incurable with modern medicine, has fewer side-effects than conventional drugs or surgery, and allows humans to be stronger physically and mentally at birth. Gene therapy or genetic engineering is the development and application of scientific methods, procedures, and technologies that permit direct manipulation of genetic material in order to alter the hereditary traits of a cell, organism, or population (NIH). It essentially means that we can change DNA to make an organism better. Genetic engineering is used with animals and plants every day; for example with genetic...
“Cloning represents a very clear, powerful, and immediate example in which we are in danger of turning procreation into manufacture.” (Kass) The concept of cloning continues to evoke debate, raising extensive ethical and moral controversy. As humans delve into the fields of science and technology, cloning, although once considered infeasible, could now become a reality. Although many see this advancement as the perfect solution to our modern dilemmas, from offering a potential cure for cancer, AIDS, and other irremediable diseases, its effects are easily forgotten. Cloning, especially when concerning humans, is not the direction we must pursue in enhancing our lives. It is impossible for us to predict its effects, it exhausts monetary funds, and it harshly abases humanity.
...nts will die before a suitable organ becomes available. Numerous others will experience declining health, reduced quality of life, job loss, lower incomes, and depression while waiting, sometimes years, for the needed organs. And still other patients will never be placed on official waiting lists under the existing shortage conditions, because physical or behavioral traits make them relatively poor candidates for transplantation. Were it not for the shortage, however, many of these patients would be considered acceptable candidates for transplantation. The ban of organ trade is a failed policy costing thousands of lives each year in addition to unnecessary suffering and financial loss. Overall, there are more advantages than disadvantages to legalizing the sale of organs. The lives that would be saved by legalizing the sale of organs outweighs any of the negatives.
In the article that I chose there are two opposing viewpoints on the issue of “Should Human Cloning Ever Be Permitted?” John A. Robertson is an attorney who argues that there are many potential benefits of cloning and that a ban on privately funded cloning research is unjustified and that this type of research should only be regulated. On the flip side of this issue Attorney and medical ethicist George J. Annas argues that cloning devalues people by depriving them of their uniqueness and that a ban should be implemented upon it. Both express valid points and I will critique the articles to better understand their points.
Scientists have no problem with the ethical issues cloning poses, as they claim the technological benefits of cloning clearly outweigh the possible social consequences, not to mention, help people with deadly diseases to find a cure. Jennifer Chan, a junior at the New York City Lab School, said, "?cloning body organs will help save many patients' lives," she said. "I think that cloning is an amazing medical breakthrough, and the process could stop at cloning organs--if we're accountable, it doesn't have to go any further." This argument seems to be an ethical presentation of the purpose of cloning. However, most, if not all scientists agree that human cloning won?t stop there. While cloning organs may seem ethical, cloning a human is dangerous. Still, scientists argue that the intentions of cloning are ethical. On the other hand, there are many who disagree with those claims. According to those from a religious standpoint, it is playing God, therefore, should be avoided. From a scientific standpoint it is also very dangerous, as scientists are playing with human cells which, if done wrong, can lead to genetic mutations that can either become fatal to the clone, or cause it severe disabilities. This information does, in fact, question the moral of the issue. If cloning is unsafe and harmful, what is the point?
Imagine a world in which a clone is created only for its organs to be transplanted into a sick person’s body. Human cloning has many possible benefits, but it comes with concerns. Over the past few decades, researchers have made several significant discoveries involving the cloning of human cells (ProQuest Staff). These discoveries have led to beneficial medical technologies to help treat disease (Aldridge). The idea of cloning an entire human body could possibly revolutionize the medical world (Aldridge). However, many people are concerned that these advancements would degrade self-worth and dignity (Hyde and Setaro 89). Even though human cloning brings about questions of bioethics, it has the potential to save and recreate the lives of humans and to cure various diseases without the use of medication (Aldridge, Hyde and Setaro).
The Problem Genetic engineering has been around since the 1960’s, although major experiments have not been really noticed until the 1990’s. Science comes in different forms, the two major being cloning and genetic reconstruction. Cloning is the duplicating of one organism and making an exact copy. For example, in 1996 the creation of the clone sheep named Dolly, the first mammal to be cloned, which was a great achievement. The other form, genetic reconstruction, is used to replace genes within humans to help or enhance the life of an unborn child for a medical reason or just for the preference of a parent.