Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Moral issues surrounding euthanasia
Religion and ethical views of euthanasia
What is catholic church views on voluntary euthanasia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Moral issues surrounding euthanasia
No stance or opinion has ever been universally backed, and euthanasia is a complicated issue with many facets. The consequences of the Catholic Church’s teachings regarding euthanasia are many and have both their positive and negative effects. A negative effect is friction caused between Catholics who support euthanasia and are put between a rock and a hard place when faced with a decision that must be made. While it is positive that the Catholic stance on euthanasia provides a third perspective that may aid the decision maker, should the person making the decision choose to use euthanasia, living with the consequences could be made more difficult with the knowledge of the Catholic Church’s condemnation of the practice. Another positive …show more content…
It brings to mind an image of a callous individual who terminates the life of the dying merely because they cannot be ‘bothered’ any longer. This image festers in the mind and both ignores and cheapens those who are aware of the pain and indecision that takes place. A further weakness in the teachings of the Catholic Church regarding euthanasia is dealing in absolutes. In an age where people are incredibly aware that the world is not cast in black and white but rather various shades of grey, the Catholic Church is using terms such as ‘an injustice that can never be excused, even if it is requested’ or ‘kill the person whose suffering we cannot bear’ which alienates many people. The latter phrase was used to describe what true compassion should not be, yet did not address if euthanasia was chosen by the suffering person in question. The former statement is damning and brings to mind being shunned, cursed and hated when they in fact are likely the most affected by the death. It was only after speaking to a Religious Education teacher that I was informed the Church would continue to support and show compassion towards those who have made the decisions, but this is …show more content…
Its teachings will affect political figures and other members of society, both laypeople and people in positions of power, and factor into decisions that they make. There will be more bills and court cases in the future attempting to legalise euthanasia, and some of those voting will be affected by the Catholic teachings. I believe the implications of the Catholic Church’s response are good in the sense that they have spread awareness of euthanasia and consider it to be a moral issue that bears discussion. It has helped broaden the minds of those who have studied the topic and made for impassioned yet reasoned discussions between students, broadening their minds to a higher level of thinking. This report has given me insight as to why the Church opposes euthanasia with such fervour, and therein allows me to respect the amount of time, effort and thought that has been spent interpreting what is believed to be God’s will and to etch out beliefs to follow, aiming to be more like Christ Jesus, who said “I have come that you may have life and have it to the full” (John
Euthanasia is an issue so interwoven within human rights and ethics that it cannot be ignored and must be addressed with Australian society. As the Euthanasia debate consists of many different arguments and stakeholders, one issue cannot be addressed and evaluated without consulting the “bigger picture”. Evidently, if Euthanasia became legal throughout Australia, there would be many implications that would follow. Firstly, religious parties would not agree with the decision that has been made, and would possibly rally and protest against those hospitals and health care centres that acted upon euthanasia laws.
Both Islam and Catholicism can be considered two major religions in the world. Ninian Smart’s seven dimensions of religion define key element in a religion. Despite the fact that the two religions are different, there are some factors which are similar between the two religions. Catholicism and Islam can be compared and contrasted through Smart’s Doctrinal and Ethical Dimensions, the history of these faith traditions in Australia and a contemporary issue of euthanasia. Through the evaluation of the Doctrinal and Ethical dimensions of religion, history and the perspectives on euthanasia, it will become clear that Catholicism and Islam are able to be compared and contrasted.
In this essay, I will discuss whether euthanasia is morally permissible or not. Euthanasia is the intention of ending life due to inevitable pain and suffering. The word euthanasia comes from the Greek words “eu,” which means good, and “thanatosis, which means death. There are two types of euthanasia, active and passive. Active euthanasia is when medical professionals deliberately do something that causes the patient to die, such as giving lethal injections. Passive euthanasia is when a patient dies because the medical professionals do not do anything to keep them alive or they stop doing something that was keeping them alive. Some pros of euthanasia is the freedom to decide your destiny, ending the pain, and to die with dignity. Some cons
As a member of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America, I feel it important to express in this essay the stand of the church on the question of euthanasia and assisted suicide. Our church has strong biblical and traditional reasons for adamantly opposing these new end-of-life approaches.
This essay will present in detail and with documentation the formation and growth and stated goals of the euthanasia movement in our country.
The ethical debate regarding euthanasia dates back to ancient Greece and Rome. It was the Hippocratic School (c. 400B.C.) that eliminated the practice of euthanasia and assisted suicide from medical practice. Euthanasia in itself raises many ethical dilemmas – such as, is it ethical for a doctor to assist a terminally ill patient in ending his life? Under what circumstances, if any, is euthanasia considered ethically appropriate for a doctor? More so, euthanasia raises the argument of the different ideas that people have about the value of the human experience.
The Catholic view of euthanasia is that euthanasia is morally wrong. it has always been taught the importance of the commandment "you shall not kill". The church has said that "nothing and no one can in any way permit the killing of an innocent person, whether a foetus or an embryo, an infant or an adult, an old person, or one suffering from an incurable disease. disease, or a person who is dying. " The church says any law permitting euthanasia is unjust.
Any discussion that pertains to the topic of euthanasia must first include a clear definition of the key terms and issues. With this in mind, it should be noted that euthanasia includes both what has been called physician-assisted "suicide" and voluntary active euthanasia. Physician-assisted suicide involves providing lethal medication(s) available to the patient to be used at a time of the patient’s own choosing (Boudreau, p.2, 2014). Indifferently, voluntary active euthanasia involves the physician taking an active role in carrying out the patient’s request, and usually involves intravenous delivery of a lethal substance. Physician-assisted suicide is felt to be easier psychologically for the physician and patient than euthanasia because
There are two methods of carrying out euthanasia, the first one is active and the second one is passive. Active euthanasia means the physicians deliberately take actions which cause the death of the patients, for example, the injection of sedatives in excess amount. Passive euthanasia is that the doctors do not take any further therapies to keep the ill patients alive such as switching off the life supporting machines [1]. This essay argues that the legalization of the euthanasia should not be proposed nowadays. It begins by analyzing the problem that may cause in relation to the following aspects: ‘slippery slope’ argument, religious view, vulnerable people and a rebuttal against the fair distribution of medical resources. This essay concludes that the legalization of the voluntary euthanasia brings more harm than good.
Euthanasia is a sensitive topic and its sensitivity brings the world to a division. The two sides are those who support the issue and those who are not in favour. The side that supports the idea can argue that...
More than likely, a good majority of people have heard about euthanasia at least once in their lifetime. For those out there who have been living under a rock their entire lives, euthanasia “is generally understood to mean the bringing about of a good death – ‘mercy killing’, where one person, ‘A’, ends the life of another person, ‘B’, for the sake of ‘B’.” (Kuhse 294). There are people who believe this is a completely logical scenario that should be allowed, and there are others that oppose this view. For the purpose of this essay, I will be defending those who are suffering from euthanasia.
As we all know, medical treatment can help save lives. But is there a medical treatment that would actually help end life? Although it's often debated upon, the procedure is still used to help the aid of a patient's death. Usually dubbed as mercy killing, euthanasia is the "practice of ending a life so as to release an individual from an incurable disease or intolerable suffering" (Encarta). My argument over this topic is that euthanasia should have strict criteria over the use of it. There are different cases of euthanasia that should be looked at and different point of views that should be considered. I will be looking into VE (Voluntary Euthanasia), which involves a request by the dying patient or that person's legal representative. These different procedures are as follows: passive or negative euthanasia, which involves not doing something to prevent death or allowing someone to die and active or positive euthanasia which involves taking deliberate action to cause a death. I have reasons to believe that passive or negative euthanasia can be a humane way of end suffering, while active or positive euthanasia is not.
Euthanasia had become a big debate in our society and the world. Many people ask, what is Euthanasia? “Euthanasia is a deliberate intervention or omission with the express intention of hastening or ending and individual’s life, to relieve intractable pain or suffering” (Sanders & Chaloner, 2007, p. 41). Thus the meaning of euthanasia is having the right to die if you are terminally ill, suffering and/or suffering a great amount of pain. Many people do not agree with the use of euthanasia, but if humans can put down animals why cannot we use euthanasia on humans? Back in ancient Greek and Roman times, the word euthanasia meant “good death”. Also it was allowed because many people did not live to long ages. When the times began to change so did people’s views on euthanasia, due to the new religion of Judeo-Christian Belief. Because life and death were giving to us by God, euthanasia goes against his wishes. If they practice in the act of euthanasia because of their beliefs they would be committing a sin and end up going to hell. (Yip,2009,p.1)
But there is no humane way of killing another person.” Still to this day there have been debates within the church about how Catholics, including some bishops and the Pope conserve that the death penalty, abortion and euthanasia is a clear breach of the right to life and an unlawful action by human beings of God's rules over life and
‘Mercy’, ‘dignity’, ‘good’ and ‘self-determination’ are the moral basis that the advocates for euthanasia defend. How appealing they sound, their accounts are simply an attempt to escape from dying process, through which we still hold our existence. The argument of pro-euthanasia might suggest that we are able to control over our life and death without moral conflict because such values related to euthanasia can justify the action of killing.