Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Discuss unequal distribution of wealth
Injustice of wealth distribution
Wealth inequality in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Discuss unequal distribution of wealth
The Catholic Church’s perspective on the effects that capitalism in first world countries has on those in developing countries can be understood by recognizing the unequal, the inhumane, and the unethical matters that come from it, as well as the waste that it causes. Capitalism is an economic and political system in which private owners control a country’s trade and industry for profit rather than by state. Considering this is dehumanizing, the question to analyze is what the Church’s perspective on the effects that capitalism in developed countries has on the people in developing countries. To fully answer the question, all concerns regarding the poor in this situation must be examined, including the unequal, the inhumane, and the unethical …show more content…
Buying low and selling high guarantees success, however, it is inhumane. Companies employ people from the cheapest countries, to work in poor working space conditions, with low wages, and little to no workers rights. Capitalism completely disregards the people who are producing the goods and services, and that they are suffering. The Catholic Church’s perspective on how capitalism in developed countries affects those in developing countries can be described by saying that “the majority [of people in developing countries] are deprived of almost all possibility of acting on their own initiative and responsibility, and often subsist in living and working conditions unworthy of the human person” (Paul VI, Gaudium Et Spes). Pope Paul VI is perfectly wording how the people in developing countries are affected; they are left working in poor conditions that is not worthy for any human, and that no person should be put into this position. It is as if the people are completely disregarded as humans. In another encyclical, Pope John Paul II goes on to state that “in this situation the individual and the people become ‘objects’, in spite of all declarations to the contrary and verbal assurances” (John Paul II, Sollicitudo Rei Socialis). In saying this, Pope John …show more content…
The unethical behavior that is associated with capitalism is unavoidable. With greed comes self-indulgence, dishonesty, corruption, abuse of power, dilapidation, fraud, and numerous other things. These issues affect those in developing countries as they fall victim to a system in which they have very little ways of changing. The Catholic Church believes that “the progressive development of peoples is an object of deep interest and concern to the Church. This is particularly true in the case of those peoples who are trying to escape the ravages of hunger, poverty, endemic disease and ignorance; of those who are seeking a larger share in the benefits of civilization and a more active improvement of their human qualities.” (Paul VI, Populorum Progressio). Pope Paul VI is speaking of the companies and people who are consumed and compelled by greed into wanting more to benefit their lives as well as their own selves. The Church’s view on how capitalism is unethical is that “it is wrong from the ethical point of view to disregard human nature” (John Paul II, Centesimus Annus). It is not morally correct to disregard those who are in developing countries and are affected by capitalism in developed countries, as they are treated very poorly and more often than not, completely forgotten about. Greed prompts many into doing things that are morally
These governments usually neglect to treat the poorest and continuously oppress them yet these corporations and governments still make deals and sales with these corrupt governments. (Singer, 2006) For Instance corporations run their operations in developing countries. Thomas Hobbes, a 17th century English philosopher, argued that all people act in their own interests, however he would give alms to the poor because providing people with some relief from misery would give Hobbes comfort. (Singer,2006) I would personally give alms to the poor because no human being should live on street it is truly sorrowful and
Greed can lead to many different situations, experiencing times of hardship, consequences, but a major consequence is poverty which is not realized through
Finally, Pope francis wants to ensure that “humanity is served by wealth not ruled by it.” The problem Francis has with capitalism is that people will sacrifice their morals to make profit. Currently there are unjust social structures that prevent change from occurring. Francis wants business and political leaders to recreate a financial system, that favours people over In reality, his goal of a perfectly fair economy is impractical.
box then all those other rich men. The others put in what they had to
In the face of media campaigns and political sanctions, the question about whether we owe the global poor assistance and rectification is an appropriate one. Despite television advertisements displaying the condition of the poor and news articles explaining it, the reality is the majority of us, especially in the Western world, are far removed from the poverty that still affects a lot of lives. The debate between Thomas Pogge and Mathias Risse regarding our obligation to the poor questions the very institution we live in. Pogge created a new framework in which the debate developed. He introduced a focus on the design of the institutional global order, and the role it plays in inflicting or at least continuing the severe poverty people are exposed to. Whilst both Mathias Risse and Thomas Pogge believe that the “global order is imperfectly developed. It needs reform rather than revolutionary overthrow”, they differ on whether or not it is just and entitles the global poor to assistance. Pogge believes that the global order is unjust as it “helps to perpetuate extreme poverty, violating our negative duty not to harm others unduly”. Risse believes that the institution is only incompletely just and can be credited to improving lives of the global poor. According to him, these improvements contribute to its justifiability and negate any further obligation we have to the poor. Through assessing their debate, it seems that one’s obligation to the poor depends on one’s conception of duty, their unit of analysis, and whether improvement rectifies injustice. On balance, it seems that we do indeed owe the poor, only we may lack the means to settle it.
...ny critics over the years, and we have seen many arguments for and against the use of a free market system. However, I believe along with the authors that without capitalism, America could not be the country it is today. Even though American society has faced many moral issues, it is not the fault of the economic system, rather the fault of the morally inept who take advantage of the system and those participating in it. The authors also develop their argument by bringing up issues that I was not able to fit into this paper such as government intrusion in the free market system, as well as corporate injustice. However, again as I stated before, these are injustices resulting from individuals, not from the core foundation of the system. Capitalism aligns closely with the economic principles laid out in the bible, and because of that it is a morally superior system.
The lack of ethics concerning global issues can be found in the sweatshops of underdeveloped and third world countries. This issue has developed from the indiscretion of industries and employers. Industries treat their employees poorly; moreover, employees are subjected to extremely poor working conditions, poverty wages, and little to no benefits or union representation. The competition of industries has created these oppressive practices. According to research done by Jay Mandle at Cambridge, in countries such as Bangladesh, sweatshop workers are paid only 13 cents per hour in US money. These workers are subjected to extremely overpopulated sweatshops, being that an astounding 3.5 million workers make up the workforce of 4,825
If one is a Christian looking to establish a business in a third world country, instead of just falling into the secular worldview of thinking that it is okay to dump waste into their water because there is no law against it; one might look at from a Christian worldview.
The first Catholic priests came to South America with the conquistadors and through social and political force superimposed 16th century Catholicism upon conquered peoples and in subsequent generations upon slaves arriving in the New World. Catholicism has, likewise, frequently absorbed, rather than confronted, popular folk religious beliefs. The resulting religion is often overtly Catholic but covertly pagan. Behind the Catholic facade, the foundations and building structure reflect varying folk religious traditions. (2)
Poverty has conquered nations around the world, striking the populations down through disease and starvation. Small children with sunken eyes are displayed on national television to remind those sitting in warm, luxiourious houses that living conditions are less than tolerable around the world. Though it is easy to empathize for the poor, it is sometimes harder to reach into our pocketbooks and support them. No one desires people to suffer, but do wealthy nations have a moral obligation to aid poor nations who are unable to help themselves? Garrett Hardin in, "Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping The Poor," uses a lifeboat analogy to expose the global negative consequences that could accompany the support of poor nations. Hardin stresses problems including population increase and environmental overuse as downfalls that are necessary to consider for the survival of wealthy nations. In contrast, Peter Singer's piece, "Rich and Poor," remarks on the large differences between living conditions of those in absolute poverty with the wealthy, concluding that the rich nations possess a moral obligation to the poor that surpasses the risks involved. Theodore Sumberg's book, "Foreign Aid As Moral Obligation," documents religious and political views that encourage foreign aid. Kevin M. Morrison and David Weiner, a research analyst and senior fellow respectively at the Overseas Development Council, note the positive impact of foreign aid to America, a wealthy nation. Following the examination of these texts, it seems that not only do we have a moral obligation to the poor, but aiding poor nations is in the best interest of wealthy nations.
The world contains a lot of societies, cultures, and classes. Each household belongs to some social class that represents their level of education, their work position, and their financial status. These different classes have created a conflict between people. It fills rich people's minds with the thought that poor people are criminals, and that conflict ended up with creating poverty. The authors Gilbert, Kahl, Magnet, and Gans are discussing the important causes and reasons that created poverty in comparing and contrasting these points with each other.
The wealthy countries cannot afford to ignore the poor. While being in a far better situation in terms of production and consumption, there is no avoiding the fact that there is reliance for resources from the developing nations. This is becoming more and more prominent in the world today. It is not reasonable for wealthy nations to exploit the poor and ‘leave them wading’. Hardin’s analogy, so very callous in nature, provides the solution to the problem is to almost turn a blind eye.
There are countless social justice issues that Christian ethicists have the opportunity to address. The aim of Christian ethics is to determine one’s moral responsibility based off of a biblical framework. When discussing many social justice issues, it is easy to decipher precisely what scripture has to say, and what humanity’s moral stance should be. Yet, in many ways, humanity will still struggle to accept that moral and ethical responsibility, even when that moral stance is clearly mapped out in scripture. One such issue is poverty. This paper will look closely at the biblical teachings on poverty, the key ethical standpoints of sacredness of life, love, and justice, as well as the moral responsibilities Christians face. It seems,
One of the most basic teachings in the Catholic Church is to ?Love one another as I have loved you.? This can be implied towards people living in poverty as we can follow the steps that Jesus had undertaken to love other people even if they are your enemies. By showing love and compassion we can create a world that is aware of poverty issues and help the declination of poverty. Countless organisations are heavily involved in carrying missions to help ultimately eradicate poverty. These charities and organisations include CARITAS, World Vision, Oxfam, St Vincent de Paul and many other non profitable organisations which help carry out work to help those who are in need.
There are legitimate concerns for the environment, for the fair and proper assistance developed nations must extend to developing nations, and for equitable educational opportunities for women. The Holy See Mission at the UN consistently promotes these authentic goals minus the snags of population control measures. It is the Catholic task to promote the human good without eliminating the humans.