Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
St. Thomas Aquinas’ precepts of natural law
St. Thomas Aquinas’ precepts of natural law
St. Thomas Aquinas’ precepts of natural law
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: St. Thomas Aquinas’ precepts of natural law
Cathleen Kaveny proposes, “The primary purpose [of law] is to guide the action of its subjects in a way that furthers the common good” (Kaveny, p. 30). Thus, Kaveny suggests that all laws and policies must be focused on improving the whole community. Cathleen Kaveny does not stand alone on this belief; Thomas Aquinas and Bernard Brady also express the need for laws to be grounded in the common good. Furthermore, each author offers other aspects of good laws; nevertheless all those other requirements in the end combine to promote the common good. It may seem easy enough when the characteristics of a good law are listed in a clear fashion, but the main concern is if they can be implemented into communities, like the University of St. Thomas. …show more content…
He states, “Law is an ordinance of reason for the common good made by one who has care of the community, and promulgated” (Aquinas, section 90.4). Thus, Thomas Aquinas reflects this same purpose as Cathleen Kaveny; laws should be made “for the common good.” Additionally, Aquinas explains what it means for a law to be made “for the common good,” declaring, “The making of the law belongs either to the whole people or to a public personage who has care of the whole people” (Aquinas, section 90.2). It seems that usually, the latter is true. A “public personage who has care of the whole people” makes the laws, as in the University of St. Thomas’ Policy on Sexual Misconduct. The article reads, “The University of St. Thomas (UST) mission and convictions embody UST’s commitment to promote and protect the personal dignity and well-being of every member of the UST community” (UST, p. 1). Hence, the objective for the University is to endorse the common good because the University aims to “promote and protect the personal dignity and well-being…of the UST community.” Thus, the common good is defended, by implementing this policy through the effort to prevent such heinous acts of sexual …show more content…
Bernard Brady reflects on similar aspects that comprise a good law, many of which are closely related to the works of Thomas Aquinas. Dr. Brady remarks on what Isidore of Seville, a theologian, believes to be the most important characteristics of a good law: “Law shall be virtuous, just, possible to nature, according to the custom of the country, suitable to place and time, necessary, useful; clearly expressed, lest by its obscurity it lead to misunderstanding; framed for no private benefit, but for the common good” (Brady, p. 32). Thus, all the conditions listed are needed to fulfill the requirements of being a good law or policy and in turn be a law to improve the common good. The importance of a law being “possible to nature” is reflected in both Aquinas’ and Brady’s writings; without this requirement, the common good will be diminished. As Brady explains, “Laws, to be good laws, have to be enforceable. That is to say, the laws must place reasonable expectations on persons. They must be based on a sensible understanding of persons and the human condition” (Brady, p. 34). Therefore, laws must not be too harsh and must be possible to apply to the whole community. Aquinas stresses the importance of laws being attainable for the community to follow: “Law ought not lay upon the multitude of imperfect people the burdens of those who are already virtuous, namely that they shall abstain from all evil. Otherwise these imperfect ones, being unable to bear such precepts,
St. Thomas’ purpose in writing the De Regno is to provide practical guidance for a Christian king on how it is that he ought to conduct his proper authority. The king, imitating God, is to lead those subject to him to their proper end, and this will be nothing other than communal virtue. This instantiation of the practice of citizen-wide virtue is the intrinsic finality belonging to political society, and for St. Thomas, it is the genuine concern of the king to lead and direct citizens towards the common good. However, before treating of the precise content of the common good of political society, and the specific means through which the king should bring this about, St. Thomas will present two principles that are fundamental for his treatise: 1) that man is naturally a political animal; and 2) the common good is the proper end of political society.
On this world, laws can be very important and can be the solution for keeping this nation and other countries together. Without laws, people would just do whatever they want to do and not think twice about it for the simple fact that they would know that there will not be any major consequences. Martin proves why these laws are so important to us and he also explains how they are important. There are many points which he proves that I totally agree with and there are also some things that I do not necessarily agree with
In legal theory, there is a great debate over whether or not law should be used to enforce morality. The sides of the debate can be presented as a continuum. At one end, there is the libertarian view, which holds that morality is an individual belief and that the state should not interfere in the affairs of the individual. According to this view, a democracy cannot limit or enforce morality. At the other end, there is the communitarian position, which justifies the community as a whole deciding what moral values are, and hence justifies using the law to enforce community values. For libertarians, judges should play a prominent role in limiting the state, while for communitarians, judges should have as small a role as possible. In between these two extremes sit the liberal egalitarians, who attempt to reconcile democratic decision-making about moral values with liberalism. The problem is made more complex when one considers that both law and morality are contested concepts. Two recent cases where this continuum can be illustrated are Canada [Attorney-General] vs. Mossap, and Egan vs. Canada. In this essay, I will attempt to explore some of the issues produced in these two cases. I will begin with a summary each case, followed by an analysis of the major themes involved. I will then place the issues in a larger, democratic framework, and explore the role of law in enforcing morality in a democracy. I will then prove how the communitarian position - as articulated by Patrick Devlin - supports the decisions given in Mossap and Egan, and how even the great proponents of libertarianism - Mill and von Hayek - would agree that the decisions were just. A conclusion will then follow.
The Rule of Law has always been a widely discussed topic throughout the history of modern political thinking. It can be defined as, “the principle that all people and institutions are subject to and accountable to law that is fairly applied and enforced; the principle of government by law” (Dictionary.com). English philosopher John Locke and Genevan philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau have both developed well-rounded and detailed accounts on the Rule of Law and its crucial role in ensuring democracy and freedom in society. Despite the undeniable success and importance of their works and ideas, I believe ________ constructed a more persuasive and influential argument in explaining the extensive effects of the Rule of Law on government and society.
construction of laws to benefit them and their values, in order to maintain the dichotomy
In this essay I will be discussing how the formal theory of the rule of law is an erroneous means of establishing laws within a state. A central theme to addressing this is essay is the distinction between formal and substantive theories of the rule of law. In order to reach my conclusion of the formal theory being proven to be insufficient, one must first appreciate the significant advantages which the substantive theory obtains. However, before doing so, I will briefly mention the importance of the rule of law in society and the requirements it needs to fulfil.
According to Aristotle, "The rule of law is better than that of any individual”, suggesting every member of society, even a ruler, must abide by and follow the law. The rule of law is linked to the principle of justice, meaning that everyone within a society (including both private citizens and government officials) are subject to the law, and that those laws are administered fairly and justly. The intention of the rule of law is to protect against arbitrary governance. It is the basic underpinning of a free society.
This is evident in Thomas Aquinas' Summa Theologica with regards to Question 94's Third Article: Do All Virtuous Acts Belong to the Natural Law? Regan explains virtue as "human excellence [which there are] three kinds: intellectual, moral, and theological" (Regan 217). Intellectual virtue consists of scientific knowledge, theories, and the 'natural law' as well as 'practical wisdom and skills.' Moral virtue is the ability to act practically through one's wisdom. Theological virtue consists of three supporting virtues: "faith, hope, and charity" (Regan 217). In Aquinas' answer he asserts that "all virtuous acts belong to the natural law, since one's own reason by nature dictates that one act virtuously" (Regan 45). Aquinas emphasizes the notion that human virtue, which consists of charity – the most excellent of all virtues which is to love God and love others – belongs to the natural law human beings are inclined to follow. Above this natural law is divine law, which surpasses all human
Law is a tool in society as it helps to maintain social control, promoting social justice. The way law functions in society and its social institution provide a mechanism for solutions. There are many different theories of the function of law in relation to society in considering the insight they bring to different socio-legal and criminological problems. In the discussion of law’s role in social theory, Leon Petrażycki and Eugen Ehrlich share similar beliefs in the jurisprudence of society. They focused their work on the experience of individuals in establishing meaning in their legal relations with others based on the question of what it means to be a participant in law. Jürgen Habermas presents a relationship between law and morality. From a certain standpoint, law is a key steering mechanism in society as it plays an educational role in promoting conducts, a mean of communication and it
According to Aristotle, "The rule of law is better than that of any individual”, suggesting every member of society, even a ruler, must abide by and follow the law. The rule of law is linked to the principle of justice, meaning that everyone within a society (including both private citizens and government officials) are subject to the law, and that those laws are administered fairly and justly. The intention of the rule of law is to protect against arbitrary governance. It is the basic underpinning of a free society.
Although it may seem counteractive to have the citizens develop the same laws that they will have to later follow, Rousseau says that all laws passed will be based on the general will and thus they will be inherently good. Rousseau states that all laws passed by the assembly are “solely the authentic acts of the general will” and because “the general will is always right” , all laws passed are inherently good.
of right and wrong buried within him. This sense guides people, culture, and even whole countries to act in certain ways. Thomas Aquinas called this innate sense the natural law. The natural law is established by God in order to make men more virtuous. When examined closely it is found that the natural law contains the precept of all law and, is at odds with certain laws that exist today, specifically abortion.
While the philosophers such as Plato were not deemed to be lawyers, their theories later set forth later developed with natural law (Riddall, pg. 59). Classical natural law theory was deemed skeptical by those believing many would value selfish means of natural desires to an extent in which others are disregarded, but philosophers such as Plato recognized the need for such principles to be moderated in order for natural responsibilities to occur a moral approach (Coleman, pg. 3). Such moderation sought by Plato was with the intent to legitimize legal orders on the account of their ethical principles. These desires or responsibilities are founded on natural, universal yearnings, demonstrating why such a foundation has proven to be so versatile in its use. The moral principles set forth through religion also played a major role in determining what was the appropriate standard as Christianity was such a dominant force in this age. This power was further applied by St Thomas Aquinas through his interpretations of living in a godly society, primarily how this involved man being at peace with one another, and allowing them to serve their religious inclinations. Aquinas favored law being for the “divine good” of society, and claimed that law that does not adhere to such principle is in fact, unjust, therefore invalid (Riddall,
William O. Douglas said, "Common sense often makes good law." Well that is what laws essentially are, rules and regulations that make sure common sense is followed. One could even say that laws are enforced ethics. Laws serve several roles and functions in business and society, and this paper will discuss those roles and functions.
Law is one of the most important elements that transform humans from mere beasts into intelligent and special beings. Law tells us what is right and wrong and how we, humans, should act to achieve a peaceful society while enjoying individual freedoms. The key to a successful nation is a firm, strong, and fair code of high laws that provides equal and just freedom to all citizens of the country. A strong government is as important as a firm code of law as a government is a backbone of a country and of the laws. A government is a system that executes and determines its laws. As much as fair laws are important, a capable government that will not go corrupt and provide fair services holds a vital role in building and maintaining a strong country.