Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Racial biases throughout history
Racial biases throughout history
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Catherine de Medici and Obsession Over Power
"An execrable woman whose memory will remain in bloody crepe until the
end of time[1]". For nearly 400 years this assessment of Catherine de
Medici held true. In the popular imagination she is a Machiavellian
schemer using poison on those who hindered her in her quest to gain
and maintain power at court, a view of Catherine reinforced in recent
years by the film La Reine Margot, based on the book by Dumas.
Most traditionalist historians take their information on Catherine
from pamphlets such as Discours Merveilleuse de la Vie, Actions et
Deportment de Catherine de Medicis, Royne Mere[2]. Claiming to be a
strictly factual account of Catherine de Medici, the author accuses
Catherine of 'rising from the dregs of society' (she came from a
powerful Florentine family on her father's side and her mother was
daughter of Jeanne de Bourbon-Vendôme, consequently a princess of
royal blood). It accuses her of poisoning Francis I's eldest son (to
make Henry, her husband, Dauphin and therefore herself Dauphine). The
pamphlet also circulates the story most associated with Catherine,
that she was the sole initiator of the infamous St Bartholomew Day's
Massacre.
The pamphlet is probably the most vitriolic of its kind, but its
claims have been repeated by other, more reputable, historians such as
JE Neale who accuses Catherine of having an 'unprincipled mind'[3].
Honore de Balzac, writing in the nineteenth century takes her conduct
as 'an illustration of the complete hardness of her heart'[4]. This
unflattering image of Catherine was scarcely questioned until Ferriere
published his 'lettres de Cath...
... middle of paper ...
...966)
pg.8
[7] Catherine de Medicis Jean Heritier (1963) pp83-84
[8] Catherine de' Medici, HR Williamson (1973)
[9] Ancien Regime, Sutherland pg.16
[10] Catherine de'medici and the Black Legend (article), RJ Knecht
(1999) published in historical magazine 'The Historian'.
[11] Ibid
[12] Arrêtez le massacre! Revue d'histoire moderne et contemporaine,
Marc Venard (1992), pp. 645-61
[13] According to Knecht pp.156 this theory is derived from Discours
du roy Henri III, a work unknown before 1623
[14] Seven ages of Paris, Alistair Horne (2002) pg. 76
[15] The Prince, Nicolo Machiavelli (edition translated and published
1999) pg. 9. The exact quote reads, "so any injury a prince does a man
should be of such a kind that there is no fear of revenge"
[16] Catherine de'Medici, RJ Knecht, pp 164
Catherine the Great, really was a great ruler. I think that overall, she was trying to be very fair to everybody. In 1773 Catherine the Great had an edict called “Toleration of All Faiths.” With this edict I thought she was showing how everybody should be treated fair by tolerating free practice of people’s faith. However, the main purpose she did this was she thought it was a good way to pacify frontier territory. Then there were some instances such as how she treated the Jews and when she attacked the privileges of the Russian Orthodox Church, which was not tolerating all faiths. Putting that instance behind though I think that she really was aware of what her duties were and what she was supposed to do. She made it very clear in her law code that the End of Monarchy was to “Not to deprive People of their natural Liberty; but to correct their Actions, in order to attain the supreme Good.”
In 1981, Isabel de Madariaga wrote the landmark book, Russia in the Age of Catherine the Great. This book was the first comprehensive study of Catherine the Great’s reign. It was a very long, thoroughly researched, very dense book about later eighteenth-century in Russia and was meant for scholars. The book I read and am reviewing, Catherine the Great: a Short History, also by de Madariaga, is more than a shortened version of her earlier work; it is a manageable, factual examination of only about 200 pages with maps, illustrations and timelines, and genealogical tables.
was backward and would need to change in order for it to remain being a
Absolutism describes a form of monarchical power that is unrestrained by all other institutions, such as churches, legislatures, or social elites. To achieve absolutism one must first promote oneself as being powerful and authoritative, then the individual must take control of anyone who might stand in the way of absolute power. The Palace of Versailles helped King Louis XIV fulfill both of those objectives. Versailles used propaganda by promoting Louis with its grandiosity and generous portraits that all exuded a sense of supremacy. Versailles also helped Louis take control of the nobility by providing enough space to keep them under his watchful eye. The Palace of Versailles supported absolutism during King Louis XIV’s reign through propaganda, and control of nobility.
"Put on what weary negligence you please, / You and your fellows. I'd have it come to question. / If he distaste it, let him to my sister" (14 -15).
Eugenie Conntesse de Teba was born on May 5th 1826 in a small village in Spain called Granada. Eugenie was the daughter of a Spanish noble, who fought on the French side in Napoleons Peninsular war in Spain. Eugenie married Emperor Napoleon the III in January of 1853 and become the last Empress of the French. Empress Eugenie was a gorgeous woman who was number one in French society in 1870.
Abigails vigorous greed gets her power in the corrupt town of Salem. She got her power from the lies she told to the mystified people of the court and town. Her lies are simple yet compelling. The way she receives this power is similar to the tyrant Adolf Hitler, he said “Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.” Even though Abby gets the power this way it is not enough for her. She then proceeds to steal her uncle's money and vanishes. Her uncle Parris tells Judge Danforth “I believe she has vanished, I discovered my - my strongbox is broke into.”(pg.126 Act 4) Abby is so greedy that she steals from her father who caught her when it was too late. The power was not enough for Abby and she left
If one was to discern Maria Theresa’ character from reading her Political Testament, one would say that she was a practical, clever, and devote Catholic woman who despite the lack of resources or empire’s affair knowledge of the empire, managed to restore the empire. One aspect in her political Testament that made her look practical was when she recognized her ignorance of the situation of the empire by admitting to be “devoid of the experience and knowledge needful to rule dominions so extensive” (Theresa, 2). She was aware of not being informed of the empire’s situation and, as a result, she depended on her advisers to solve the empire’s dilemmas. On the other hand, she was a devote Catholic but not to the point of unconditionally supporting the church in financial matters. In her testament, she noticed the monetary indulgency that the church enjoyed due to her predecessor’s generosity, but she considered that times were different and the church did not need as much economic support as before because they had already achieve the goal of converting most people in the empire to Catholicism (Theresa, 7). It would be safe to say that she was in tune with the ideas of the enlightenment because her decisions were based partly on reason and not tradition. The mere fact of her assuming the crown instead of her husband Duke Francis Stephan of Lorraine shows that she did not follow the tradition. (Johnson, 113).
Macbeth's destiny and his lust for power, confirmed by the Three Witches and Lady Macbeth, leads to destruction. Every act that Macbeth commits effects the kingdom as a whole. Macbeth's indecisiveness and his understanding of success cause this destruction. This lust for power leads Macbeth, as it would all men, to an evil that exist in everyone. It is his destiny to fail.
The Success of The Tudors in Dealing With Their Problems The Tudors faced a great deal of problems in their reign between 1485 and 1485. and 1603. The start of their reign was the start of modern age. All rulers of the Tudors experienced very difficult problems.
Dethroning and subsequently having a hand in the murder of one’s spouse is usually considered taboo in today’s society. However, for Catherine the Great, it was simply another one of her past accomplishments, yet, it is massively overshadowed by the great things she did during her rule. This substantial ruler was born May 2, 1729, in Poland, eventually moving to Russia to marry Peter III, who became the ruler of Russia later on. Six months into Peter’s rule, he was overthrown by his wife, and eventually killed. This is where Catherine’s rise to eminence began. More specifically, Catherine the Great augmented Russia’s territory and considerably impacted the country within it’s borders, thereby securing her position as a significant figure in history.
Mary Tudor led an influential life as she reigned as Queen of England. Being the first female monarch, a different aspect of modern rule arose. Due to having a troubled past, she showed a darker side of her that led to a vicious future. Mary’s malevolent actions, both gruesome and unethical, paved the way for her to be known throughout history as Bloody Mary. In spite of her vile doings, she made positive advancements in England which were overlooked.
15 she went to Russia to become the wife of Peter, nephew and heir of
today's era (Wade and Tarvis, pg. 5). So Shakespeare was not the first person to
Stephanie, you discussed having seen some work teams where little to no energy because the person in charge has little power or authority. I have experienced some work teams that have been quite successful even when the person in charge is of a lower rank than the other group members. I believe that the reason for these successes is that the person has high levels of personal power. Personal power is, “influence derived from an individual’s characteristics” (Robbins & Judge, 2009, pg 415). More specifically I think that it come from referent power. In the lecture Dr. Fischer said that, “referent power is the ability to influence others and the ability to be likable” (Fischer, n.d.). Titus 3:1