Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Laws understanding contracts
Laws understanding contracts
Understanding contracts essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Case Study Two In this case study a man (Sam Stevens) is living in an apartment where he invented a product. He has verbally promised to deliver this product to a store. He then receives an eviction notice from his landlord, for the product disrupting other tenants and for conducting a business out of the apartment. Then receives a notice from the store; asking for the product that he had promised to be delivered immediately. The four elements to a contract are an offer, an acceptance, an intention to create a legal relationship, and a consideration (usually money). The first and second element of a contract is the agreement, which is made up of an offer and an acceptance of a contract. The elements of an offer are (1) serious intent …show more content…
Capacity is the legal ability to enter into a binding agreement. Most adults over the age of majority have capacity; those under the age of majority, people suffering from mental illness, and intoxicated persons do not. I realize from reviewing these elements that I’m missing many facts from the case study that are just not revealed. For example there is no discussion of a written legal contract, only verbal promises. Quasi-contracts are sometimes called implied-in-law contracts, but they are not actually contracts. Rather, in order to prevent one party from being unjustly enriched at the expense of another, the courts impose contractual obligations on one of the parties as if that party had entered into a contract. This case would not reflect a quasi-contract as this would focus more if intent, offer and acceptance was not established verbally or written. In this case study there was a verbal agreement. The case study in regards to the obligation made to the store for the product falls in the realm of promissory estoppel. This is the one exception to the rule requiring consideration, the legal enforcement of an otherwise unenforceable contract due to a party’s detrimental reliance on the contract. Promissory estoppel occurs when three conditions are met and in this case and tin this case all three were met: • One party makes a promise knowing the other party will rely on
Were the items specially manufactured goods? Is the defendant to blame since the items cannot be sold at any other location? Is the verbal agreement for the sale of goods more than $500 enforceable?
However, the fourth element, which is "legal object," may not be satisfied between Sam and the chain store because there was nothing in writing, nothing was “drawn.” An oral promise would make the contract invalid if the completion of that promise will take more than a year from the date of agreement. However, if the chain store has written proof confirming Sam 's promise, for example, advertisements, invoices that the store only prepares in the regular course of business after an oral promise for a product delivery has been made, a court may consider Sam 's oral promise legally binding. Then it would be considered a "primary obligation" (since there was a debt incurred in anticipation of the sale of his invention at their stores). In that event, the contract does not need to be in writing to be enforced since primary obligations are not within the statute of frauds. So if the chain store does not get their 1000
Promissory Estoppel in NY states that in the absent of a written contract, a promise or an implied agreement is sufficient to hold the company responsible.
When discussing the concept of contract law, there exist two bodies of legal rules that may apply to the contract. These bodies are the common law of contracts and Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code or the UCC. The common law of contracts is court made and is constantly changing, but the UCC is required in every state within the U.S.A. It is important to know which one to use and when, as well as what the differences between them are.
Within the Social Contract Theory, living within a society requires us to have rules and laws. This gives people the groundwork for how people and governments cooperate. Individuals receive stability when they live in a social structure. This gives them security from other individuals that may want to do them wrong. In order for them to receive this protection, they have to give up some freedoms, such as being able to steal without receiving punishment. Individuals need to commit to helping make society secure, and happy.
A Theory of Justice is the magnum opus of 20th century social contract theorist and political philosopher, John Rawls. A bit of background into this work is that social contract theory had fallen out of favor with political scientists and philosophers since the last 18th century, with the success of the American Revolution and the apparent triumph of John Locke and Democracy. However, with the advent of modern globalization, the emergence of America as a superpower, but the growing concern of socio-economic disparity necessitated a revisiting of the social contract, what it means, how societies and governments were best constructed.
The plaintiff must show that the defendant’s product representation was not fully the truth (Prince, 2006, p.
The case presented is that of Sam Stevens who resides in an apartment. He has been working on an alarm system that makes barking sounds to scare off intruders, and has made a verbal agreement with a chain store to ship them 1,000 units. He had verbally told his landlord, Quinn, about his new invention and Quinn wished him luck. However, he recently received an eviction notice for the violation of his lease due to the fact that his new invention was too loud and interrupting the covenant of quiet of enjoyment of the neighbors and for conducting business from his apartment unit.
An example is a hundred- dollar offer made by the couple to Stan, to hold the particular car. The couple made a hundred dollars offer to Stan which is an element of a legal contract. An offer is a
The English contract Offer and Acceptance General principles There are three basic essentials to the creation of a contract which will be recognised and enforced by the courts. These are: contractual intention, agreement and consideration. The Definition of an Offer. This is an expression of willingness to contract made with the intention (actual or apparent) that it shall become binding on the offeror as soon as the person to whom it is addressed accepts it. An offer can be made to one person or a group of persons, or to the world at large.
Paragraph c, the last part of Section 14 of SOGA, states that there is an implied warranty that the goods shall be free from any charge or encumbrance in favor of any third party not declared or known to the buyer before or at the time when the contract is made. If the seller fails to comply, the buyer is entitled to claim for damages since the matter is being constituted as an implied warranty. Section 15 of the SOGA is on the sale of goods by description. It states that where there is a contract for the sale of goods by description there is an implied condition that the goods shall correspond with the description; and, if the sale is by sample as well as by description, it is not sufficient that the bulk of the goods corresponds with the sample if the goods do not also correspond with the description. The case in point is the case of: Purshotumdas and Co. v Mitsui Bussan Kaisha Ltd. (1911) 12 SSLR
One of the last remaining strongholds of classical contract law is the notion that contracts require offer and acceptance therefore, in order for a contract to become binding, offer, acceptance, consideration and intention to create legal relations must exist. However contracts are formed in different ways for each different circumstance. (Shawn Bayern, Offer and Acceptance in Modern Contract Law: A Needles Concept, 103 Cal. L. Rev. 67, 102 (2015)
Possibility of a certain or ascertainable performance – contract must be physicaly capable of being executed.
This case mentioned below is a fine example of understanding the Law of Contract in a better manner. (Gerald, 2014).
There are certain elements that are covered in the concept of capacity such as mental disorder, intoxication, minors and so on.