Jim And Laura Buy A Car Case Summary

986 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: 4 elements of a valid contract

Did Jim and Laura Buy a Car? Jim and Laura didn't purchase any vehicle according to the case analysis since the elements of the contract in the unwritten contract. Initially, Jim and Laura voluntarily visited Stan the salesman in his dealer shop and willingly agreed to grant Stan a hundred dollars to keep a specified blue four-door sedan car for a day. The existence of the business contract is justified by the essential elements of a contract applied the buyer and the seller that include an offer, acceptance, and considerations to accept the terms (Billah, 2006). An example is a hundred- dollar offer made by the couple to Stan, to hold the particular car. The couple made a hundred dollars offer to Stan which is an element of a legal contract. An offer is a …show more content…

A competent party with the capacity to perform is held responsible and is liable for duties the party agrees to execute unless the individual is incapacitated, intoxicated, or a minor. Stan, the salesman, is considered capacitated to enter a legal contract since he is a mandated dealer to offer clients the opportunity to test the cars and seal purchase deals through purchase contracts. Therefore, Stan is liable for breaching the initial contract terms by insisting on new terms through the phone that the buyers did not agree on, Stan is legally responsible for refusing to give back the hundred dollars to Jim and Laura. However, Jim and Laura could have explained to Stan that their ability to purchase the car is based on four hundred dollars installments and therefore give Stan Salesman an opportunity to understand Jim and Laura’s capacity. Jim and Laura’s reason for not purchasing the car justifies that they did not have the financial capability since they did not want to spend the four hundred dollar monthly installments on the

Show More
Related

  • Case Study Of The Real Estate Purchase Contract

    1649 Words  | 4 Pages

    This case study examines various real estate contracts – the Real Estate Purchase Contract (REPC) and two addendums labeled Addendum No. 1. Addendum No. 1 and Addendum No. 2 – pertaining to the sale of 1234 Cul-de-sac Lane in Orem, Utah. The buyers in this contract are 17 year old Jon D’Man and 21 year old Marsha Mello; the seller is Boren T. Deal. The first contract created was Jon and Marsha’s offer to purchase Boren’s house.

    Read More

  • Takem's Case

    2560 Words  | 6 Pages

    Walker, Takem’s has the statutory law of contracts in his favor. In a contract, the seller and the purchaser have certain rights and obligations. Four basics must be met for a contract to be created (Chrisman, 2014). First, the offer has to be made. In the case at hand, the door-to-door salesperson made an offer of a computer to Ms. Walker. Second, the consideration has to be accepted. Ms. Walker accepted the offer to purchase a computer. The third step is capacity. The purchaser must be legally capable of entering into a contract; minors and the mentally incompetent are excluded in this case. Takem’s has given Ms. Walker the computer in exchange for her payments on her store account. Finally, the intention to enter into a contract has to be present. Ms. Walker signed a bill of sale, a security agreement, and a negotiable promissory note- which is an unconditional promise to pay a certain sum of money at a certain time in the future. Though Takem’s has the advantage to combat her claims, Tommy needs to ensure that his salespeople have not made any false statements or misrepresentations to Ms. Walker as this could have legal implications for the store and against the contract (Vaccaro, 1987). Ms. Walker is legally bound by the contract she agreed to in exchange for the computer; however if there has been any misrepresentations or false statements Ms. Walker may be able, with legal assistance, to call the contract into question

    Read More

  • The Statute of Frauds and the Uniform Commercial Code

    820 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...useless car to a junk yard to recover some loss, but the difference of the re-sale of the junk-car would be a significant loss. Though there were no adequate assurances to the contract, anticipatory repudiation is the only probable remedy for Jack. However, the outcome would weigh on the predominant factor test, which is met because Tom is covered as a merchant because he is operating in his usual daily business, and Jack is the buyer. The sole purpose of the contract was for Tom to sell Jack a car, and for Jack to buy a car from Tom. The UCC, though less stringent than the statute of frauds, does effectively regulate commercial transfers allowing the free market to operate without diminishing the integrity of trade.

    Read More

  • Four Elements Of A Contract

    903 Words  | 2 Pages

    The four elements of a contract are the agreement, the consideration, contractual capacity, and a legal object. The oral agreement between Sam and the chain store satisfies the agreement element of a contract definition because when the chain store offered to sell Sam 's invention at their stores, Sam accepted by agreeing to ship 1000 units in exchange. The second element of a contract, the “consideration of each party,” is satisfied because Sam and the chain store have something to give the other (1000 units of the invention in exchange for the exclusive sales of the product at their stores). The third element is “contractual capacity,” which may or may not be fulfilled since we do not know Sam 's age or whether

    Read More

  • What Jim and Karen Timmons' Liability Is under the Florida's Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine

    1814 Words  | 4 Pages

    Karen and Jim purchased the car with their joint bank account as co-owners, to be used as a family car when they were still together. However, Karen and Jim were estranged at the time of the accident. Karen continued to pay all of the car’s up-keep after their separation, and she allowed Jennifer limited permission to use the car to go strictly to and from school and restricted Jennifer’s access otherwise.

    Read More

  • The Uniform Commercial Code In The UCC)

    823 Words  | 2 Pages

    One such difference lies in the acceptance of an offer. Under the common law of contracts, an acceptance must objectively manifest intent to contract. Under the UCC, a contract for the sale of goods may be formed in any manner sufficient to show agreement, including conduct by both parties that recognizes the existence of a contract, even without an explicit expression of

    Read More

  • Explain The Law Of Disaffirmance Of A Contract In Business Law

    3180 Words  | 7 Pages

    1.1 Explain at least four points of differentiations between contract and agreement with the help of examples.

    Read More

  • Legal Studies

    1166 Words  | 3 Pages

    Legal Studies Essay Joey Agerholm Exclusion clauses determine the liability of something that might go wrong within a contract. They are used by sellers as an attempt to avoid or limit their liability. The seller has the advantage over the buyer who must agree to the clauses to purchase the product/service. Because of the buyers disadvantage the court takes such cases, involving exclusion clauses, very seriously, and the content of the clauses are carefully interpreted. With the current Trade Practises Act and the Fair Trading Act the standard form of business contract is adequate and effective in protecting the buyer. The Trade Practise Act is the most effective legislation for the protection of the consumer. It implies to the following situations:- - “A promise by the seller that the buyer will become the owner” If a car dealer breaks a promise or part of a contract, for example that he has the right to sell a car, and the car is stolen then although the buyer will have to give the car back he/she will get her money back. - “ A promise by the seller that goods will fit the description supplied by the seller” In this case the buyer is protected if the seller makes a promise, which is a condition of the contract, describing the product, and when the buyer receives the product, it does not match the description. - “ A promise where the seller is made aware of the purpose for which the goods are required, that the goods will be reasonably fit for that purpose” This condition is implied when the buyer makes the purpose of the goods needed known to the seller, and the buyer then relies on the seller’s judgement in providing the correct product. For example it would not be reasonable if you made the seller aware that you wished to purchase something suitable for mowing the average suburban backyard and you were sold a tractor. - “A Promise that goods are of merchantable quality” According to this act a good is considered to be merchantable if they are suitable for the prospect for which other similar goods are sold, involving the description applied to them, the price and any other relevant information. This act does however does not protect the consumer if he/she has examined the product and missed any defects that should have been seen or if the seller made him/her aware of the defect prior to the purchase of the product.

    Read More

  • The Four Step Process Of The Case Of Carlill V. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company

    1279 Words  | 3 Pages

    Agreement is a mutual understanding of two parties and willing to accept terms and conditions in order to form a legal contract (Penthony et al.2014). Agreement consists of two components; offer and acceptance. Offer is made by an offeror in an exchange for performance from another party on certain terms while acceptance is the action of accepting to the terms of the offer. An offer must follow the requirement in order to form

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Contract Law

    717 Words  | 2 Pages

    Since the elements were met to satisfy an actual contract being made, with promises albeit moral and legal, the behavior in which Johnny executed warrants a breach of contract on his part. Also to note is Johnny is not a merchant under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), which defines a merchant as “a person who deals in goods of the kind or otherwise by his occupation holds himself out as having knowledge or skill peculiar to the practices or goods involved in the transaction” (American Business Law Journal, 1970). Had Mark been identified as a merchant, he would have been held to a different set of rules and Johnny would have been protected, but Mark is a casual seller and not held to a higher standard of

    Read More

  • Negligence Case Study

    2378 Words  | 5 Pages

    In our given scenario we are asked to discuss legal principles influencing the likelihood of any successful action against Steve in the grounds of negligence. Steve’s negligent driving caused a series of events that caused losses to the other people presented in the scenario and they take actions against Steve in the grounds of negligence. At first we must understand what negligence is. The tort of negligence provides the potenti...

    Read More

  • UCTA law essay

    936 Words  | 2 Pages

    The plaintiff firm of surveyors bought a second-hand Rolls Royce from the defendants which developed serious defects after 2,000. It was held that the firm was acting as a consumer and that to buy in the course of a business 'the buying of cars must form at the very least an integral part of the buyer's business or a necessary incidental thereto'. It was emphasised that only in those circumstances could the buyer be said to be on equal footing with his seller in terms of bargaining strength.

    Read More

  • The English contract Offer and Acceptance

    1227 Words  | 3 Pages

    An offer can be made to one person or a group of persons or to the world at large. The offeror is bound to fulfil the terms of his offer once it is accepted. The offer may be made in writing, by words or conduct.

    Read More

  • Case Study Of Offer And Acceptance In Modern Contract Law

    894 Words  | 2 Pages

    Law for Business Students defines offer as a full clear statement of terms on which the offeror is prepared to do business with the person(s) to whom the offer is communicated. In Gunthing V Lynne [1831] it was stated that an offer cannot be vague. Acceptance is the unconditional assent to the terms

    Read More

  • Carill V Carbolic Smokeball Case Study

    1388 Words  | 3 Pages

    This judgment given set criterion which is still been used in the modern court system and due to this case it was developed that an offer of contract can be unilateral and doesn’t have to be made to a specific party only. Also it was developed to that the acceptance of an offer does not require a notification and that once the concerned party purchases the product the contract is active then and there itself. And it was also established that purchase of an item is a fine example of consideration and therefore makes it a valid contract. (Smith, 2000).

    Read More

More about Jim And Laura Buy A Car Case Summary

Open Document