Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction to debt crisis
Debt crisis of the 1980s
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Introduction to debt crisis
1.0 Introduction
Dubai’s debt exists as a fundamentally important aspect of modern economic research. Set against a backdrop of fluctuating stock prices, an unstable real estate market and an uncertain world economy, speculation about the future of Dubai is rife, despite Dubai initially appearing to bear the global financial crisis far better than most other affected countries.
However, Dubai shocked the world by requesting a moratorium on debt repayment on 25 of November 2009. Foreign banks had previously pumped significant amounts of money into Dubai as loans and investment, knowing that they would suffer huge losses if the emirate defaulted on its debt. Thus, Dubai’s requested prompted financial markets worldwide to plummet immediately.
On November 25, 2009, the Dubai government announced that the company intends to ask all providers of financing to Dubai World and its subsidiary Nakheel to standstill and extend maturities until 30 May 2010. However, towards the end of 2009, 10,500 employees were made redundant as part of a restructuring plan carried out with the help of Deloitte consultants (Twins, 2009).
At that time, Dubai World had debts amounting to US$ 59 billion, including a US$ 3.5 billion loan which the company had been forced to default (Naseer, 2009). Research showed that US$ 3.5 billion actually accounted for almost three-quarters of the UAE’s total debt of US$ 80 billion debt (Smith and Kiwan, 2009).
Initially, the government of Dubai had refused to guarantee the debt of Dubai World due to sharp drop in the stock market of both Abu Dhabi (8.3%) and Dubai (7.3%) to the lowest levels in over 12 month amid the false belief, on the part of creditors, that Dubai World exists as part of the government. With this refusal, a global panic started as it had confirmed the false belief and that the company would now be unable to immediately pay its
The financial crisis of 2007–2008 is considered by many economists the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s. This crisis resulted in the threat of total collapse of large financial institutions, the bailout of banks by national governments, and downturns in stock markets around the world. The crisis led to a series of events including: the 2008–2012 global recessions and the European sovereign-debt crisis. The reasons of this financial crisis are argued by economists. The performance of the Federal Reserve becomes a focal point in this argument.
Sovereign lending, throughout history, has been marked by occurrences of partial default and repudiation by governments of all kind; from medieval princes to dictators to democratic regimes. In the 1970s lending to lesser-developed countries led to the rescheduling and partial defaults in the 1980s. Even the sustainability of the debt of nations such as Belgium, Canada, Italy and even the United States is not free from suspect.
DuPont is a very big company with a low debt policy designed to maximize financial flexibility and insulate operations from financial constraints. It is one of the few AAA rated manufacturing companies due its investments are primarily financed from internal sources. However, because prices fell in the 1960’s thus DuPont’s net income fell also. The adverse economic conditions in 1970’s escalated inflation: increase in oil prices increased required inventory investments of the company. 1975 recession negatively affected DuPont’s net income by 33% and returns on capital and earnings per share fell. The company cut dividends in 1974 and working capital investment removed. Proportion of debt increased from 7% in 1972 to 27% in 1975 and interest coverage falls from 38 to 4.6. The company perceived increase in debt temporary but moved quickly to reduce its debt ratio by decreasing capital expenditures. Debt proportion dropped to 20%, interest coverage increased to 11.5 by 1979.
In assessing Du Pont’s capital structure after the Conoco merger that significantly increased the company’s debt to equity ratio, an analyst must look at all benefits and drawbacks of a high debt ratio. The main reason why Du Pont ended up with a high debt to equity ratio after acquiring Conoco was due to the timing and price at which they bought Conoco. Du Pont ended up buying the firm at its peak, just before coal and oil prices started to fall and at a time when economic recession hurt the chemical industry of Du Pont. The additional response from analysts and Du Pont stockholders also forced Du Pont to think twice about their new expansion. The thought of bringing the debt ratio back to 25% was brought on by the fact that the company saw that high levels of capital spending were vital to the success of the firm and that high debt levels may put them at higher risk for defaulting.
Debt-to-equity ratio: The debt-to-equity ratio for 2010 is $3,738,150/ $4,781,471=.782. For the year 2011, the debt-to-equity ratio is $2,722,811/ $5,672,551=.478. This number is calculated by Total Liabilities / Owners’ Equity
As higher investors generally expect higher returns for a more leveraged firm (Arnold 2013 p 697) there would appear to be very little scope for the RM to increase its debt capital unless it can convince investors profits are likely to profit significantly. Unfortunately the annual report does not suggest such growth is likely short term, due to increased parcel competition and falling letter sales (RM 2015).
The "subprime crises" was one of the most significant financial events since the Great Depression and definitely left a mark upon the country as we remain upon a steady path towards recovering fully. The financial crisis of 2008, became a defining moment within the infrastructure of the US financial system and its need for restructuring. One of the main moments that alerted the global economy of our declining state was the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers on Sunday, September 14, 2008 and after this the economy began spreading as companies and individuals were struggling to find a way around this crisis. (Murphy, 2008) The US banking sector was first hit with a crisis amongst liquidity and declining world stock markets as well. The subprime mortgage crisis was characterized by a decrease within the housing market due to excessive individuals and corporate debt along with risky lending and borrowing practices. Over time, the market apparently began displaying more weaknesses as the global financial system was being affected. With this being said, this brings into question about who is actually to assume blame for this financial fiasco. It is extremely hard to just assign blame to one individual party as there were many different factors at work here. This paper will analyze how the stakeholders created a financial disaster and did nothing to prevent it as the credit rating agencies created an amount of turmoil due to their unethical decisions and costly mistakes.
After the crisis UAE’s economy suffered from 2008-2009 the economy has diversified itself and does not depend solely on oil anymore but also on other sectors such as tourism. The inflation rate of Dubai is 0.33% which is also significantly low (Dubai Statistics Centre,2016).The small medium enterprise does not want to take a risk where there are fluctuations in price level thereby effecting the buying power of people and also the demand and supply of the Al-Simpkin’s product. Furthermore,the government encourages foreign investment and besides the agent there are free zones such Jabel Ali which is the largest
By 1996, 60 international airlines were flying into Dubai. This was also the year that emirates received an order of a billion dollars worth of ...
In the super city Dubai, a place which not so long ago was a desolate desert where very few lived is now a thriving metropolis with a population of 2,404,237 (S, Lamia, Al-Neef & b, 2014) . The main monetary contribution to the industrialization of Dubai was from the raw material crude oil that was discovered in 1966 (Dubai-info.org, 2015) in the Fateh Oil Field (Emirates, 2015). Since it was realised the oil was not a sustainable to maintain their economy, decisions were made to focus on tourism and real-estate (Stone, 2014).
The recent Global Financial Crisis (GFC) initially began with the collapse of credits and financial markets, which caused by the sub-prime mortgage crisis in the US in 2007. The sub-prime mortgages were given to high-risk lenders (with bad credit history) who were in danger of defaulting, which eventually caused a global credit crunch, where the banks were unwilling to lend to each other. In October 2008, the collapse of the major financial institutions and the crash of stock markets marked the peak of this global economic slowdown (Euromonitor International, 2008).
In this paper, we review the balance sheet provided or XY Bank and cover the differences between a company and a bank’s balance sheet. Additionally we highlight why some of the balance sheet figures are what they are and look at loans and securities and cash levels held at the bank.
Barra Airways has an interest coverage ratio (ICR) of 18; this means that Barra Airways is not burdened with a large amount of interest payments on existing debts. Therefore, using debt does appear to be an attractive source of finance. This is because Barra Airways existing interest burden is low, meaning that to increase it would have a reduced effect on the company’s net profit. However, EasyJet has an ICR of 30.88, considerably larger than that of Barra Airways [5]. Lenders may look at this data and conclude that Barra Airways is a riskier company to lend too than others in the same industry; this will result in a higher interest rate on any debt taken out.
As the world has recently passed through the global financial crisis that begun in 2008 in the USA with the banks’ collapsing, analysts are giving different opinions and making new economic hypothesizes about the origin of, as well as the process of different countries escaped from the crisis. Among all these new “theories”, the case of Islamic banks is interesting in terms of its nature and consequences. In my essay, I will try to highlight the basic principles of the Islamic finance, the reasons of the restriction of interest, the most important tools used by Islamic banks in economic activities and brief explanation of them, and finally my view point of the probable future improvement of the Islamic financial system.
Warwick J. McKibbin, and Andrew Stoeckel. “The Global Financial Crisis: Causes and Consequences.” Lowy Institute for International Policy 2.09 (2009): 1. PDF file.