Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nature vs nurture biology
Nature vs nurture biology
Nature vs nurture biology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Nature vs nurture biology
Born in San Francisco, California, Cosima Niehaus grew up with loving, smart, but ultimately kind of hippie parents. The question of nature vs nurture was pretty clear with Cosima. Though a precocious and clever child, Cosima found it difficult to connect with her fellow classmates, and only some of that was due to her intelligence. It was after graduating from UC Berkley with her bachelors and masters in biology that Cosima began working in laboratories in the city while she decided if she wanted to go even further into biology. Science was a notoriously misogynistic career choice, unfortunately, but it was something that really called to Cosima. Of course, college had opened up a whole new avenue for her. She opted to stay on campus, instead of with her parents, and Cosima explored every aspect of her sexuality.
Her parents weren't necessarily close-minded, but they were always demanding to know where Cosima was, who was she going with, what was going on? At the time, she figured it was because her parents had her later in life, that they were just concerned for their own child in a way she didn't understand.
In retrospect, maybe she should have been more concerned. She had been sending out applications to colleges with good biology programs when Beth Childs contacted her. Katja Obinger had found the Canadian cop after discovering at least three other clones in France, Italy and Greece. Beth had used face recognition software and found Cosima and Alison Hendrix, a stay at home mom local to Beth. Curious as ever, Cosima helped set them up with Skype so they could all talk face to face. The resemblance was uncanny. She had to see it first hand.
Clone Club was formed - yeah, Alison didn't like the word, but how else could Cosim...
... middle of paper ...
...und out Delphine's true identity (Cormier, not Beraud). Though the pair break up, Cosima headed to Canada to meet with the other clones about what to do about Helena - the other clone who was killing them. Unfortunately, Leekie has given them all contracts in which they get exactly what they're looking for in return in return for two yearly visits. Leekie's leverage over Cosima happened to be her entire genetic code, the sequences DNA, for her to research and study. Cosima is tempted since she recently discovered that she had the same lung illness that Katja was suffering from.
Cosima discovers that the contract is bullshit, that they are patented and property of their creators. Any autonomy they claim to give them is a lie. Unfortunately, it's not before Alison has signed and turned in her paperwork, and Sarah has discovered that Kira and Mrs. S have gone missing.
Sandra Cisneros was born in Chicago and grew up in Illinois. She was the only girl in a family of seven. Cisneros is noted for her collection of poems and books that concentrate on the Chicano experience in the United States. In her writings, Cisneros explores and transcends borders of location, ethnicity, gender and language. Cisneros writes in lyrical yet deceptively simple language. She makes the invisible visible by centering on the lives of Chicanos--their relationships with their families, their religion, their art, and their politics.
She always wanted to be the center of attention, she was prejudiced and believed things should stay the same, and she was very selfish. While she thinks she’s above everyone else, she feels that the world revolves around her.
...ndmother would not let her in her house for fear that she might cause trouble! At her mother?s birthday party no one would really speak with her, afraid of what she might say. While her sister and younger brother still respected her, to be shunned by the majority of ones own family would have to be a very traumatic experience.
By educating herself she was able to form her own opinion and no longer be ignorant to the problem of how women are judge by their appearance in Western cultures. By posing the rhetorical question “what is more liberating” (Ridley 448), she is able to get her readers to see what she has discovered. Cisneros also learned that despite the fact that she did not take the path that her father desired, he was still proud of all of her accomplishments. After reading her work for the first time her father asked “where can I get more copies” (Cisneros 369), showing her that he wanted to show others and brag about his only daughters accomplishments. Tan shifts tones throughout the paper but ends with a straightforward tone saying “there are still plenty of other books on the shelf. Choose what you like” (Tan 4), she explains that as a reader an individual has the right to form their own opinion of her writing but if they do not like it they do not have to read it because she writes for her own pleasure and no one else’s. All of the women took separate approaches to dealing with their issues but all of these resolutions allowed them to see the positive side of the
...perceived. Therefore, she uses her writing to give women a voice and to speak out against the unfairness they endure. As a result, Cisneros’ story “Woman Hollering Creek” demonstrates a distinction between the life women dream of and the life they often have in reality.
Susan Faludi unfolds a world of male domination and its interrelationships within its confines and places women in the center of her story. Indeed it truly took an extremely self-confident woman to even entertain the idea of entering an all-male academic college like the Citadel, whose front gate practically reads like that of a young boys fort that makes the bold statement, “No girls allowed they have coodies.” Shannon Falkner was a strong willed woman with an immense amount of confidence to completely omit her gender on the Citadel application to enter this college. As if gender was not an issue, or should have never been an issue in
In his novel, Cantor's Dilemma, Dr. Djerassi uses female characters to address sexist issues arising from women integrating into the predominantly male science world. The characters, Celestine Price and Professor Arderly, are used to show examples of how women have little voice in the field of science. The female characters suggest how women are often looked upon as sex objects rather than co-workers and they are given little opportunity to balance a scientific career with raising a family. By weaving these issues into his novel, Dr. Djerassi illustrates the following theme: Discrimination against women in the field of science is harmful to the progression of scientific exploration. If women are excluded from science, then an artificial limit is put on human resources. (The field of science will not utilize the potential female minds available.)
Growing up in two cultures, Sandra Cisneros witnessed the major impact of poverty and racism (Norton Anthology 1587). Using literature as an outlet, Cisneros wrote her first piece of literature at age ten (Norton Anthology 1587). The best lessons come to a person once the lesson is experienced. She often writes about the intricate dynamics between men and women. Cisneros displays colorful aspects of the Chicana culture. The Chicana culture is a unique combination of North American and Mexican American traditions. The skilled writer dominates her field by explicitly revealing the similarities and differences between the two societies.
There are conflicts with the main character and her father. We see the conflict with her father when Oates’ has the psychiatrist have the woman talk about her father and express some feelings towards him, she said “I was afraid of him. But I loved him” (46). There was a mixture of feelings for him since he was her father, so she loved him, but he also wasn’t the best role model in her life and was someone she feared. As the woman shares memories of her father, the readers realizes that her father is one reason why she is in the state she is in today. One quote from the story to further the statement about her father is, “He had many secrets he kept from all of us, about work, and money…even from my mother he kept secrets” (46). She couldn’t trust him and didn’t know what he was saying was true and what was a lie. That most likely made her not able to trust other men in her life, thinking they would act the same way to
The integration of past and present was difficult for all members of the family. Grandmama was removed from her memories and misunderstood by most of her family. Father was stuck between his mother’s beliefs and traditions and his children’s quest for Science. As Choy revealed more about each character’s worries and needs, he created a natural avenue for conflict and resolution. Given this progression and a bit of analysis, the reader understands that it can be difficult to hold on to one’s beliefs in a “strange
Marianne Moore graduated from Metzger Institute in 1905. She then went to Bryn Mawr College. She majored in history, law, and political science. Since she loved laboratory courses in biology and histology, she wanted to become a physician. She graduated in 1909 with a B.A degree but did not become a physician, lawyer, or a painter like she wanted. Instead, Moore enrolled into a one-year course at Carlisle Commercial College. After graduating, she started working at the U.S. Industrial Indian School in Carlisle. Marianne and her mother traveled together, visiting cities they had dreamed of and spent hours in art museums. She taught Native American students the standard secretarial skills of the time book home in Carlisle. She taught there for four years successfully (Parrish 1). She learned a verbal decorum and precision from her mother. And Moore had never married (Stone 2).
Rowan, Carl. "Cloning People is Coming, with Surprising Results." Kentucky New Era 1 Mar. 1997: 13. Print
The adults never really believed in any of them. Growing up an only child and being misheard and misunderstood must’ve been hard. That’s why she loved being around the babies and her aunt and uncle. They loved her and would care for her unlike her parents who were never around.
In Evelyn Fox Keller’s article “The Anomaly of a Woman in Physics”, she describes her struggles as a physics graduate student at Harvard in 1957 (Fox Keller, 2001, p. 9). Throughout her story, she details her at-odds situation with the physics department, her male peers, her advisor, and the two other female graduate students in the physics department. She starts off by being rejected by Cal Tech and the wildly successful professor under which she wanted to study, followed by being persuaded by her would-be advisor to attend Harvard for her graduate studies (Fox Keller, p. 9). During her first year, Fox Keller was unable to take her preferred class, despite being told before she arrived that all of her academic hopes and dreams could be made
Thus, ensuring Watson to stipulate: “My life is a sheer privilege because my parents didn’t love me less because I was born a daughter. My school did not limit me because I was a girl” (1), which was an effort to provoke a specific emotion from the audience (Pathos), and to imply that her life did not encounter gender stereotypes. Nonetheless, Watson failed to understand that the audience would not relate to her childhood descriptions, bearing in mind that every human being grows up an a unique environmental setting, there are those that would embrace different perspectives of gender, and the audience would not possess the same education as Watson. Also, there was an absent of a sentimental tone when unfolding her childhood to the audience, which would not evoke an emotion to her audience. As a final point, Watson is unable to generate her childhood reminiscences into compelling trials, meaningful moments, or biographical events. For example, Watson offers another short account of her childhood that is supposed to draw a parallel to feminism: “My mentors didn’t assume that I would go less far because I might give birth to a child one day” (1), even so, the small description lacks an expressive tone, and there is a possibility that the audience would discover the short account monotonous, unstimulating, and not