Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Hela cells
Some of the issues consisted of information/consent, privacy, ownership/financial claims, exploitation, fairness, respect, simple courtesy, race, class, and their educational level. Ms. Lacks was publicly identified as the source of the HeLa cells decades ago. In modern day scientists finished the genome of HeLa cells, added and notated their results and posted them in a system with other scientists observations. This affects the privacy rights privacy rights not only of Ms. Lacks but also of members of her family. In addition to being concerned about privacy and consent, we should also consider if people who provide tissues for research benefit in any way. Some of the real significant issues in this case relate to a lack of respect for Ms. Lacks and her family, as well as justice, race and social class. The HeLa cells were fueling modern …show more content…
It helps that health is named as a right in legally binding treaties, but the reality of how one works to see connections between ill-health, discrimination or marginalization, and political choices for example, is key. The impact of human rights violations on health. Some examples of the impact of violations of human rights on health are obvious; for example, a person who is tortured will experience health problems as a result. Other examples of impacts of human rights violations on health are less obvious. The inter-relationship between enjoyment of rights and conditions that promote health A focus on the underlying conditions that create health and well-being reveals that many of these conditions are human rights issues. The most profound underlying condition is social and economic status. Lower socioeconomic status has been repeatedly linked to poorer health. Racial and gender discrimination are also underlying conditions which can negatively impact
In this paper, I will analyze Rebecca Skloot’s book, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, concentrating on Henrietta Lacks’ life, as well as ethical controversies and sociological impact surrounding the HeLa cells. First, I will discuss the author’s main arguments and the type of evidence used throughout the paper. Then, I will summarize the life of Henrietta Lacks focusing on her diagnosis and treatment up to her death. After, I will describe the ethical debates that the author presented and how they relate to Henrietta Lacks and the HeLa cells. Finally, I will examine the impact HeLa cells have had on the society, specifically regarding the medical community, as well as the effect HeLa cells had on Henrietta’s family.
In 1951, the sickness of a poor African American woman named Henrietta Lacks -also know as HeLa- would go on to change the face of scientific research; without her consent. Henrietta Lacks went into John Hopkins Hospital in hopes of medical treatment, but instead her cells were unlawfully stolen from her and used for scientific advances in the world of medicine for the creations of the polio vaccine, cell cloning, vitro fertilization, and gene mapping. Long after Henrietta's death, Henrietta's family was forced to live a life of poverty without medical insurance simply because they could not afford it although their mothers cells had yielded billions of dollars due to its advances in the medical world. The scientific community and the media
On the concept of feasibility, disputes regarding practicality make reparation impossible. The fundamental definition of “family” yields the question of deciding which members of the Lacks family should be eligible for remuneration. Would compensation conclude with Lacks’s immediate kin or expand to extended family? Her children Lawrence Lacks, Sonny Lacks, and Zakariyya Bari Abdul Rahman would undoubtedly receive restitution, but the passing of daughters Elsie Lacks and Deborah Lacks complicate the case for direct descendants. Hence, no just method exists to determine which relatives would qualify for restitutions. Additionally another hindrance to compensation arises: who should be held accountable for repaying the Lacks family? The default culprit Johns Hopkins merely freely distributed HeLa to other laboratories, never garnering any profit from the cells. Hundred of research institutions across the globe have received samples of HeLa; thus, tracking down each individual laboratory would be next to impossible. Even if that feat was feasible, what monetary value should be compensated? No single individual or organization has the authority to dictate an appropriate amount that can simultaneously satisfy both family and compensator as well as solve the ethical
HeLa cells were one of the greatest medical inventions that came about for the scientific field and yet the woman behind this medical feat is not fully remembered and honored. Her cells and tissue were taken away from her without consent and more than that, she was exploited for being black and not questioning what the doctor was doing. Her family suffered through countless years of agonizing pain in which they were misinformed about where and what her cells were being used for. Yes, HeLa cells changed the way we view medicine today, but only at the cost of creating one of the greatest controversies of owning ones body.
Bioethics is the use of morals in science. If there had been more bioethics in Henrietta Lacks’s case, her doctors may have used their morals to not take the cells from her body without her permission or at least let her family know they had. Sixteen years before her case, the Nuremberg Code had been created which stated 10 codes of ethics to be used during human experimentation. However, it was not a law and few doctors even knew it existed.The issue of informed consent was also brought up in 1957 but doctors testified it was unnecessary. However on June 30th, 1974,17 years later, a law was passed requiring informed consent for all federally funded research. The issue of bioethics affected HeLa and many began to doubt if the doctors at Johns Hopkins had really been ethical. In conclusion, Henrietta Lacks and her “immortal” cells helped the field of science and its future
...ave. They have been through a lot by people asking over and over about the HeLa cells. I think the least the doctors could do is tell them the actual truth about how they used those cells and stop making them guess or always wonder. I think they should have told them when they come to get the blood what they were actually using it for. They may not have understood, but the least they could do is tell them. They could have told them they wasn’t taking their blood to see if they had cancer they should have told them they were taking it for the HeLa cells. I think it was a good thing when I found out that Gey was actually doing research on the cells and not actually trying to get money. I thought this whole time he was probably getting money from it. I think when he was doing his research he was actually trying to help people, not put the Lack’s family through so much.
Prior to the successful cultivation of HeLa cells, failure was met with every attempt to grow cells in culture. This roadblock became the focused work of Dr. George Gey of Johns Hopkins University. Johns Hopkins served most of the impoverished black community seeking care in the immediate Maryland area. This provided a goldmine for medical research that was justified by its “generosity” and Samaritan charter. Henrietta Lacks decision to seek care for her cervical cancer unknowingly designated her as arguably the single greatest contribution to science and medicine. After the realization that human cells had finally been successfully harvested and reproduced, Dr. Gey immediately distributed the cells and his methodology to anyone who asked. As the explosion of research on HeLa cells swept across the scientific community many of Dr. Gey's colleagues urged him to publish or patent cells to take credit for his for work but his dedication to the work rather than the credit prevented him from doing much publishing if any at all. The implica...
Health Disparities and Racism is an ongoing problem that is reflected among society. Health is when an individual is physically, mentally and social well being is complete. However health disparities seems to be a social injustice within various ethnicities. Health disparities range from age, race, income, education and many other things. Even though we realize health disparities are more noticeable depending on the region of country where they live in. Racism is one of the most popular factors, for why it’s known that people struggle with health.
Although the participants in the Stanford Prison Experiment volunteered to take part in the study, they didn’t know that they would be subjected to mistreatment and dehumanization. Just like Day in The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, he gave consent for the autopsy of Henrietta, but he did not know the doctors were going to cut and take Henrietta’s cells. Also the researchers in the Stanford Prison Experiment didn’t realize or speak out about the reality of the study. They never really thought that the prisoners were real people being abused. Until one day when someone outside the study objected to the condition the prisoners were under. This is similar with the doctors and researchers working with HeLa, they didn’t speak out and did not fully realize that the HeLa cells were actually from a real person and that person had a family. Then someone brought attention to the fact that the cells used to be part of someone and they had a family that loved
Until Skloot took it upon herself to investigate the history behind the HeLa cells, there was not much information about who Henrietta’s life before her contribution to the scientific world. In a sense, HeLa cells dehumanized Henrietta, “everything was always just about the cells and [no one] even worried about her name and if HeLa was even a person” (Skloot, 122). Rather than being recognized as a mother, a daughter, a courageous woman who fought cancer, she was only known for the cells that were taken from her tumor. Henrietta did not live to see all of the people that her cells helped or the “multi-billion dollar industry” that became of HeLa cells (Skloot, 208). While her family struggled to make ends meet, never having enough money for health insurance, companies reaped the benefits of HeLa cells. Additionally, the family did not know about Henrietta’s cells until scientists began using her husband and children to further their research on HeLa cells (Skloot, 384). Continuously, the Lacks Family was being taken advantage of by the scientific world, never receiving compensation compensation for the profits HeLa cells generated. While the companies were conducting ground-breaking research to save millions of people’s lives, the Lacks family failed to receive proper medical care. It seems like there is not much harm done considering HeLa cells were saving millions of lives and the Lacks family were just a small group of people suffering. However, is it really ethical to save all of these lives knowing that the family responsible are not receiving proper medical
Copy text from the site/article Henrietta’s cells were the first immortal human cells ever grown in culture.
Farmer, Paul, and Nicole Gastineau. 2002. Rethinking Health and Human Rights: Time for a Paradigm Shift.
Yamin, A. 2008. Beyond Compassion: The central role of Accountability in applying a human rights framework to health. Health and Human Rights, vol.10 (2); 1-20
Undoubtedly, health provides quality of life and freedom for everyone. For example, health is a very vital component in children’s life as it provides proper growth and development to their mind and body. Children require enough energy to spend the entire day in school and fully participate in the activities on the field. However as we speak, the right to health
It is not enough anymore to speak only health and sickness, because it is important to understand how environment affects people’s health. Also economical issues like economical growth create conditions for the deveploment of wellfare. In equality appears to have a significant impact on human health. Client`s status should be strenghtened and communities must activate the function. (Terveyden edistämisen eettiset haasteet 2008)