Case Study Girl Interrupted

647 Words2 Pages

Girl, Interrupted- A Video Response

Differences in Initial Meeting or Diagnosis

Difference in Medical Response1
Susanne tried unsuccessfully to hurt herself and was not admitted to the medical hospital for a 72-hour psych hold. She was released back into the custody of her family. There appeared to be no follow up treatment from the hospital or medical organization that helped thwart the suicide attempt. Susanne was released back into the care of her family without the issuance of a case worker or without referral to external resources to help with her situation. Ultimately, she was sent to a bias family friend to receive treatment for her condition. (Mangold, 1999)
From the unset of her tale, one can tell a few advancements since the timing of the story in the 1960’s. First, it is uncommon when a patient is admitted into an emergency with an active attempt on their life for the patient to be release quickly to their family. Normal procedures state that they patient can be held for 48-72 hours if the physician believes there may be a genuine chance of harm. Second, it is also uncommon, that there would be no human services offered to the patient. It is more likely that if the patient was released, no matter if it is …show more content…

From the being of the known session, he may have been using Gestalt therapy practices questioning what Susanna saw as real. There was no true effort to examine what caused the client’s initial behavior. At one point, Susanna lost herself into a flash back and therapist want to blame her feelings and thought process on recreational drug instead of a psychiatric illness that may have been contributed to past experiences. After Susanne stated that she was not on any recreational drugs, the doctor suggests she needed rest to relieve her illness. When Susanne suggested she go home and rest, the doctor stated she needed to go to a place “where people like her could get real rest”. (Mangold,

Open Document