Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Vertical and horizontal analysis of coca cola company
Coca cola financial analysis
Coca cola organizational challenges
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Case Analysis of Coca Cola
1. In the 1980s, under CEO Roberto Goizueta, Coca-Cola was a global brand with a growing presence in global-emerging markets like Europe, Russia, and South East Asia. It beat back its main rival Pepsi to be a leader in the carbonated beverage market with a 70% market share. During the 1990s however, under new CEO M. Douglas Ivester, the company’s market share started declining due to political (regulatory), economic, social (consumer), and technological (operations) challenges in the marketplace.
While Coca-Cola was trying to consolidate its position in it’s core cola market, there was an increasing shift in consumer tastes in favor of non-carbonated beverages such as juice, tea, and bottled water. Local brands in local markets moved in to fill the gap in Coca-Cola’s product lineup, and to cater to the growing local tastes and nationalistic preferences of consumers.
Coca-Cola’s global bottling & distribution system, consisting of ten anchor bottlers, was one of its greatest strengths. These independent bottlers like CCE, in which Coca-Cola held a significant minority stake, enjoyed a good run till the currency crises in Russia, Asia and Latin America in 1998 put a strain on the bottlers’ profit margins and on Coca-Cola’s profits in turn.
European regulatory authorities scuttled Coca-Cola’s growth and acquisition plans by invoking anti-monopolistic regulations against the company. The nationalistic and protectionist governments took a political stance against Coca-Cola, which was perceived to be a symbol of domineering, American businesses. Health and hygiene issues related to Coca-Cola’s products in Belgium & France further dented the company’s prospects in Europe. Domestic (US) and global...
... middle of paper ...
.... This strategic change was symbolized through Daft’s decision to stop construction of a large, ostentatious new headquarters on European soil.
Although Daft’s changes put Coca-Cola in a position to respond well to local opportunities, his global strategy was subject to certain risks. First, innovative product ideas and successful marketing strategies implemented at the local level might inadvertently remain there. In addition, customizing products to meet local tastes could be expensive.
And finally, with increased independence of regional offices, Coca-Cola’s main global mission might not be carried out consistently throughout the globe. Daft must adopt a strategy that incorporates local sensitivities with a unified global approach. This approach will put Coca-Cola in a position to be a global leader in the 21st Century.
Bibliography
Cocacola.com
Advancement pursued by Coke has relied heavily on expansion efforts throughout the globe and within the United States. Elmore describes one particular case example relating to Coke’s drive for increase presence when he states later on in the book that the Coca-Cola corporation created a Foreign Department for the purpose of international marketing. Heavily promoting the economic benefits that accompany the importation of Coke, a task force of five members were appointed to persuade officials overseas to bring the Coke product to their country. Commonly poor countries were preyed upon falling victim to Coke’s ploys, and promise of economic growth allowed Coca-Cola to move production operations throughout the world. Communities deprived of the natural resources to endure Coke’s presence suffered most from the expansion, yet Coke had no regard other but for themselves. Elmore reasons how goals of cutting costs for Coca-Cola have been achieved through exploiting countries on behalf of their own private
It took Coke’s Chairman and CEO Douglas Ivester seven days to provide a formal apology to Belgian consumers (Schwartz, 1999). Because of Coca-Cola’s delayed response to the crisis, they risked spreading anxiety over its products among its consumers (Abelson, 1999). However, Coca-Cola did cooperate with the Belgian health ministry throughout the crisis to make sure its products were safe. For Coca-Cola’s investors, the lack of preparation and quick response from its CEO may have brought doubt on whether the company could manage growth and future strategy well (Schwartz,
Although produced by main market players, soft carbonated drinks cost more than similar products from local and private label manufacturers, consumers are willing to pay an extra price for the name, particular taste, and image. Fierce competition in the CSD industry forces Coca-Cola and PepsiCo to expand into new and emerging markets which present high potential for the company’s development. However, some foreign markets proved to be highly competitive. Coca-Cola Company’s operations in China faced antitrust regulations, advertising restrictions, and foreign exchange controls. iii.
One of the Coca-Cola Company’s strongest strengths lies in its ability to conduct business on a global scale while maintaining a local approach, one of the most intelligent strategies thought up by the human resource department of Coca-Cola.
Coca –Cola (KO) is one of the world’s largest beverage companies. Company was incorporated in September 1919 under the State of Delaware law and headquarters is located in Atlanta Georgia. But from 1886, company established its brand in US (Coca-Cola, 2012, p. 1). Currently company is providing for more than 500 varieties of non-alcoholic sparkles to the customers around the world. Apart from this, company also serve for still beverages that includes enhanced water, water, ready-to-drink, juices, energy drink, sport drinks and so on.
Coca cola has always dominated the markets outside United States unlike Pepsi’s internationalization strategy that took too long. Therefore, the long-term brand of Coca cola and better pricing strategies would help in competing with Pepsi. Unlike, Pepsi, Coca cola had targeted entering into partnership and alliances with local distributors and firms. This helps to develop strong relationship within the domestic firms to reduce the domestic barriers and thus, enhance the company’s competitiveness (Thabet, 2015). Lastly, the Asian markets consist of related and supporting industries to the soft drink industry that helps the companies in gaining a strong competitive position in the markets. Based on the competitive advantage of nation’s model, Coca cola has more home based advantages to develop a competitive advantage in relation to other countries on a global
... objects and customer regions. Do making a clear differentiation image between its soft drinks and bottled water. Because the consumers may believe that bottled water of Nestle sounds healthier than Coca-Cola brand since Nestle tend to emphasize their image on healthy food products. Then do market test for new taste, new packaging, or new innovation according to each regions, and especially for Europe, the company should launch the new one to replace Dasani image in order to seize their market shares. They may renew all nutrients and packaging. Finally Coca-Cola should continue its joint ventures with the regional companies in order to protect their products from barriers to entry both international trade restrictions and distribution channels. Furthermore, joint venture with local brand is a long term contract guarantee to make it easier for HOD to a specific region.
There comes a time when customized products and personalized services were catered exclusively for the discerning and well heeled. Coca-cola stands as a testament to personalized luxury. There has been an up-shift by certain manufacturers trying to offer tailored ranges and services to a wider audience
The case study "Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in the Twenty-First Century" focuses on describing Coke and Pepsi within the CSD industry by providing detailed statements about the companies’ accounts and strategies to increase their market share. Furthermore, the case also focuses on the Coke vs. Pepsi goods which target similar groups of costumers, and how these companies have had and still have great reputation and continue to take risks due to their high capital. This analysis of the Cola Wars Continue case study will focus mainly on the profitability of the industry by carefully considering and analyzing the below questions:
As the world 's largest manufacturer and distributor of non-alcoholic beverages, Coca-Cola is certainly no stranger to global marketing. Established in the US, Coca-Cola initiated its global expansion in 1919 and now markets to more than 200 countries worldwide. It is one of the most recognizable brands on the planet and also owns a large portfolio of other soft drink brands including Schweppes, Oasis, 5 alive, Kea Oar, Fanta, Lilt, Dr Pepper, Sprite and PowerAde. Despite this, Coca-Cola often struggles to maintain its market share over its main rival PepsiCo in some overseas markets, particularly Asian countries.
The Coca-Cola Company is global well known company. The Company re-entered Indian markets in year 1993. The company had to leave earli...
Look SDmart, Retrieved 05/16/07, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1365/is_1_31/ai_63974359/print. Coca-Cola: A Technological View, retrieved 5/18/07, from http://projects.olin.edu/ahs/HOT2004/PolarBears/content.htm. Coca-Cola Our Company- Around The World, retrieved 5/18/07 from http://www.coca-cola http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/ourcompany/aroundworld.html Nutrition Business Journal. Penton Publishing. October/November 2005.
This proven track record for the company can be attributed to a number of factors, the first which is relatively crucial is the company's secret formula for Coca-Cola, which comparably tastes better than what competition has to offer in the market. The company's ability to come up with new products while at the same time reinventing the old products has offered them a competitive edge over their peers. The company boasts of having the world's most diverse and comprehensive distribution networks, this offers them accessibility to billions of people in areas that would prove rather difficult for their peers to distribute their products. The African continent has been cited as an excellent example, it is more often than not to see a distribution outlet for coke on a remote location on the continent
Learning from experience Coca-Cola has had some fierce competition over the years but nothing in the form of an entire health market shift like now. As well as mounting political persecution of its products like they are facing today. They must rely on past experiences to get through but likely will need to start studying the new trends to stay relevant.
The political environment in India proved critical in that their government was unfavorable to foreign investors. They prohibited the import of soft drinks since they felt it could be gotten anywhere. They also prohibited the foreign brand name and wanted the name Lehar Pepsi and Coca-Cola India, an indigenous name. These effects couldn’t have be anticipated prior to entering the market because the trade policies, rules and regulations of India were difficult and unpredictable. Development in the political arena would have been handled well if Coke would have evaded having to sell 49% of its equity by approving to start new bottling plants.