Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
American literature has many ethnic groups
How is friendship portrayed in of mice and men
How is friendship portrayed in of mice and men
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: American literature has many ethnic groups
Carson McCullers‘ short story “Sucker”, is about two cousins who share a room and some experiences. Throughout the short story, Pete and Sucker grow and change. Their relationship and attitudes affect the way they act towards each other and Pete learns a very important lesson, to treat others the way you wish to be treated because they will treat you the same. “Treating others the way you wish to be treated” is a saying that is very often thrown around. In Carson McCullers’ short story, I found that she used her characters to show her readers that by not treating others the way you wish to be treated that they too will forget how to treat you properly. I felt that this was a very important message throughout the short story for many reasons. …show more content…
I felt that the most clear representation of this theme in the story is the change between Sucker’s appearance from the beginning of the story to the very last sentence.
Pete admitted during the course of the story, that he treated Sucker poorly. When he was not yelling at him, he would ignore him or send him out of their room. For a brief period, they began to bond while Pete was having a good time with a girl that he was interested in; she affected his relationships with others. “And another thing- sometimes this look in his eyes makes me almost believe that if Sucker could, he would kill me.” The author specifically used the look in Sucker’s eyes to represent how Pete’s previous actions changed the way Sucker matured. Sucker was introduced with “having the look of a kid who is watching a game and waiting to be asked to …show more content…
play.” The author often referred to Sucker’s eyes to show his emotions. At the start of the novel, McCullers stated that Sucker was a very observant kid and that he was always looking at what Pete did. Later on, she used the look in his eyes to show his maturing. He used to have a timid look in his eyes, but now he looked like he was expecting something nice. During their fight, his scared eyes blinked. After the end of their argument, he looked at Pete with a hardened look. The theme in this short story reminded me of one in the novella Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck.
It is about two friends who travel from ranch to ranch to find work during the Great Depression. The two men have formed and important bond and look out for each other. At their new job on Tyler Ranch, they befriend and rancher named Slim. I think that both Of Mice and Men and “Sucker” share the common theme of treating others the way you wish to be treated because their attitude towards you will change. In Of Mice and Men, Slim is described as being loyal and understanding. He is well trusted throughout the ranch that he works on. The character Pete in “Sucker” had the opposite attitude towards others. Pete was rude to Sucker and made it hard for Sucker to open up to him. Whenever Sucker would try to talk to him, Pete would tell him to shut up or to leave him alone. Whereas Slim made it so that George could confide in him. One chapter in Of Mice and Men showed George talking to Slim about how him and Lennie were not actually cousins. During the time that the novella is set in, it was very hard for people to trust each other. Slim was loyal to others because he wanted others to be loyal to him, which they were. Pete was not loyal to Sucker and made it very difficult for them to create a bond. Nearing the end of the story he commented on how he missed the short period of time where they had bonded. He realized that he should have kept that in mind when he was mistreating someone
he cared about. This also reminded me of a story that my mother used to tell me when I was younger. She used to tell me stories as a fun way to teach me lessons. There was one that got stuck in my mind like a piece of gum on the bottom of a shoe. I was a young girl with an obsession with fairy tales, so the two main characters were a prince and a princess. The prince was in love with a beautiful princess names Olivia. He would I always try to get her attention but she rarely acknowledged him and when she did it was in a rude manner. The poor prince was heartbroken and eventually gave up. Many months later, Olivia fell in love with that same prince. He had matured since his heartbreak and was not going to let a rude princess win him over. He treated her the same way that she had treated him. By the end, she learned her lesson and knew to always treat others the way she wanted to be treated. I have associated Olivia from my story to Pete from “Sucker” because they were both rude at the beginning of their stories, but both realized their mistakes. The prince and Sucker were both hurt and both grew from their experiences. Sucker may not have had his heart broken, but he was deeply hurt because of the way he was treated by Pete. I see that they both share the common theme of treating others the way you wish to be treated because they will treat you the same way. This was shown in my fairytale when the princess would ignore the price over and over again but then realized that she loved him. The same idea happened when Pete ignored Sucker when he wanted to talk, then realized he valued their relationship. Carson McCullen used characterization as a method to convey the main theme of treating others the way you wish to treated because they will forget how to treat you with kindness and respect. The short story begins with Pete describing his relationship with Sucker. He later says “all I had to do was just glance at Sucker and he would get up from whatever he was busy with maybe half smile at me, and leave without saying a word.” He also said that he was mean to him lots. The author used Pete’s actions and behaviour to portray the theme, as well as Sucker’s reactions. By the end of the story, Sucker’s behaviour changes drastically. “He sprawls across the bed in those corduroy pants with the suspenders and just stares at me with that hard, half-sneering look.” Sucker had never been described as a rough kid, but his attitude had definitely changed. Sucker no longer treated Pete with the same awe and respect. I think that the example of characterization that is has the most impact is when Pete says “Our room isn’t mine at all.” This has a large impact because the entire introduction to the story was based off of how it was “his” room. I think that this was very powerful because Pete realizes that he mistreated Sucker and has to suffer the consequences. Overall, this short story was very well-written. The elements of fiction were clear and were detailed. The story made my an impact on me because of the detail and clear theme. I learned that not keeping others feelings in mind will affect my relationships and possibly others. I should always treat others the way I want to be treated because this will better my relationships and lifestyle. Treating others with kindness and understanding is always the way to go. I believe that many people could benefit from all of the themes found in the story. Others will have a different perspective on the stories’ themes and it will impact them in other ways. I think that this would open many people’s eyes and that they would realize that we should all keep in mind that treating others the way we wish to be tested will result in stronger bonds.
On Saturday, September 9th, 2017, at 2034 hours, I was dispatched to 3217 Grouper Rd in reference to a domestic violence incident that had just occurred.
George chooses to stick with Lennie, despite his mental disabilities. They are loyal to each other, even though they are different: “Even in the open one stayed behind the other” (2). Their desire to spend time together in fellowship indicates the theme of true friendship. Later on in the novella, George and Lennie are introduced to Slim, the jerkline skinner on the ranch. Because his job requires him to move around, Slim, like most migrant farmers, is lonely. He observes George and Lennie’s unusual friendship and questions it saying, “You guys travel around together?” (34). George and Lennie’s loyalty to each other protects them from the loneliness of their work, revealing one important benefit of true friendship. Near the end of the novella, Lennie is in the barn with
Lennie is unintelligent all throughout the story. “‘Uh-uh. Jus’ a dead mouse, George. I didn’t kill it. Honest! I found it. I found it dead.’” This quote shows that Lennie doesn’t understand that keeping a dead mouse as a pet is not sanitary and not the right thing to do. Another time, George was exclaiming to Slim that he once told Lennie to jump into the Sacramento River and there Lennie went, right into the river. This trait of Lennie’s effects the story because it got him and George kicked out of Weed when he wanted to feel a girl’s dress. It also got him into trouble when they got to their new job. His unintelligence gets him into more trouble as the story goes on making him anything but a sympathetic character.
In the short story “Sucker,” Carson McCullers conveys the message about how a loss of innocence can change not only one’s behavior, but also one’s relationships with others. This message is shown in the story through Carson’s portrayal of Pete and Sucker’s relationship. Throughout the beginning, Pete, the narrator, has been depicted as a role model to Sucker, his younger cousin. However, Sucker has no idea about how Pete views him. At one point, Pete realizes that in his relationship with Sucker, “the funny thing was that no matter how many times he got fooled he would still believe me. Not that he was dumb in other ways…”(26). Carson reveals the innocence of Sucker through this description; words such as “fooled” and “dumb” are used to describe someone who is clueless and thoughtless. This
Which is, can he stay with George? Or should he truly leave? Would George be happier without him to take under his wing? After this moment, in page 39, George is striving to convince Slim, the head skinner, how Lennie “ain’t no cuckoo… He’s dumb as hell, but he ain’t crazy.” George is undoubtedly trying to stand up for Lennie as best as he can, even though Slim can clearly see that Lennie has a mental disability and George could easily confirm it. This signifies how strongly George feels about Lennie and his well-being; George would rather give his disabled friend a shot at a job rather than leaving him and working on without him. As such, George’s repetition of Lennie not being “cuckoo” informs one of his feelings and thoughts towards Lennie. Because George is portrayed in Of Mice and Men as critical of Lennie’s mental disability, it is a key moment when George actually defends Lennie’s behavior and chances of a job. Lastly, page 85 tells of Lennie voicing out his worry about his dream of owning rabbits, - after accidentally causing his newborn puppy’s
There are many cases in which Lennie’s child-like personality proves to be a burden. In the second chapter, George tells Slim the real reason why he and Lennie left Weed. “Well, he seen this girl in a red dress. Dumb bastard like he is,
Following the beginning, Lennie is seen as a bit on the softer side contrary to George who was a heavy-tempered individual. We later find out that Lennie has a mental illness implied by language, communication and actions towards George and others. Demonstration of his illness was implied by: "I’d pet ‘em, and pretty soon they bit my fingers and I pinched their heads a little and then they was dead—because they was so little. I wish’t we’d get the rabbits pretty soon, George. They ain’t so little." (Steinbeck 4). Lennie’s childish personality and mistakes in the novel somewhat foreshadowed future events. George told Slim about the incident in Weed: “Well he seen this girl in a red dress...he just wants to touch everything he likes” (Steinbeck 41). George harshly remarked that his mistakes could get him in serious trouble, which was a vital, empowering statement within the novel that hinted at a dark
As the story continues on and the pair arrive at their job, the character chart begins to branch as we are introduced to Slim, another worker on the farm. After learning of the two’s past together, he openly expresses, “Ain’t many guys travel around together... I don’t know why. Maybe ever’body in the whole damn world is scared of each other” (Steinbeck 35). There is a unique value to George and Lennie’s relationship which the world lacks. Rather than combining their might, people would rather watch their own back with one set of eyes than having a second set to keep watch. There is mistrust between people and the idea of backstabbing and swindling is very present due to the economic decline and the loss of wealth for all social classes. Due to Lennie’s mental decline, however and the fact that if it were not for George, Lennie would not be alive, there is a strong bond apparent. To be separated from one another would mean becoming the rest of the world, sad and lonely. Neither of the two would like to bring sorrow to one another or let each other go through
When Lennie and George encounter Slim, another ranch hand, they automatically respect him and react positively towards him. “This was Slim, the jerkline skinner. His hatchet face was ageless. He might have been thirty-five or fifty. His ear heard more than was said to him, and his slow speech had overtones not of thought, but of understanding beyond thought. His hands, large and lean, were as delicate in their action as those of a temple dancer.” (Steinbeck, 33-34) Slim is the noblest of the ranch as the only character who seems to be at peace with his circumstances and his life. The other characters view slim as wise and respectable man and often go to him for guidance, as the only person who has achieved what he wants in life.
This is a novella written by John Steinbeck in 1937, about two men that lived during the depression. They were migrant workers, who wanted to buy a farm. ()
‘Lennie never done it in meanness,’ he said. ‘ All the time he done bad things, but he never done one of ‘em mean.’ “ page 95. George knows that Lennie would “never done it in meanness.” He sees the good in Lennie but is not able to help Lennie because he is peer pressured into being the one to kill his best friend. George has stood by Lennie’s side though all the bad he has done in the past yet when he let others get into his head, he ends up killing Lennie. Earlier in the book, when Slim and George are talking, Lennie not being mean comes up. Slim said, “ ‘ Didn’t hurt the girl none, huh?’ he finally asked. ‘Hell, no. He just scared her. I’d be scared too if he grabbed me. But he never hurt her…’ ‘He ain’t mean,’ said Slim. ‘I can tell a mean guy a mile off.’ ” page 44. Even Slim can see that “[Lennie] ain’t mean” and that he would never want to hurt anyone. He understands when George explains that Lennie just scared the girl, nothing else, but she lied to the law. Not only does George know that Lennie is a good guy but so does Slim. Slim claims he “can tell a mean guy a mile off” which proves that if Lennie really was a mean guy, then Slim would not be saying otherwise.
The story is set on a ranch, where the two men eventually find work at
Relationships are an important essence of life. Humans need relationships because we are dependent on each other to survive. Babies need their mothers to feed and nurse them, and friends need each other to support, comfort, sympathize, and understand them. The friendship between George and Lennie outlined the core of Of Mice and Men, and although it’s sometimes idealized and exaggerated throughout the novel, there is no question of its sincerity. Lennie thinks of George as his only friend, his guardian, someone who he can trust and depend on, someone who had accepted him for who he is despite his childlike tendencies. Every time he did something wrong, his only thoughts would be of George’s disapproval. “I done a real bad thing. I shouldn’t have did that. George’ll be mad. An’… he said…. An’ hide in the brush till he come. He’s gonna be mad.” (pg. 92) On the other hand, George thinks of Lennie as a constant source of frustration, and as he frequently mention in the novel, “God, you’re a lot of trouble. I could get along so easy and nice if I didn’t have you on my t...
This is the main conflict. As the two men move throughout the novel, it is apparent they are clinging together in the face of loneliness and alienation. George and Lennie are insecure, with no permanent jobs, no real home, and separated from their families. Also, in the end, it was society which leads to George into killing Lennie. After Lennie gets into the debacle with Curley’s wife, he runs to the oasis described at the beginning of the book. George fears the men will tear Lennie apart and murder him. He also knew he would be institutionalized, or “caged” if he survived the attacks. He had the moral clarity that lets him see that killing Lennie is the what is best for him. When George kills Lennie, it’s a kind of mercy killing. It’s clear that killing Lennie is the right thing to do, and George is manning up by pulling the trigger. We know this because Steinbeck gives a contrasting example of Candy, who says that he "shouldn 't ought to of let no stranger shoot [his] dog" (39). Second, Slim says, "You hadda, George. I swear you hadda" (107), and Slim is the novel 's ideal man. His Struggles against society carry on even after Lennie’s death. He now faces living alone without friendship or hope. It is also the death of his dream; owning a shack on an acre of land that they can call their own.
Slim befriends Lennie and George, and makes them feel welcome. Lennie and George are quite the opposite to the rest of the characters, as they don't have a family, and they finish off physically fighting for work, because they need it so badly. In the second chapter all the other characters sound like commoners