Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The four principles of medical ethics
Autonomy in patient's rights
4 principles medical ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The four principles of medical ethics
Dr. Carrie James is a pediatric cardiologist at Riley Hospital for Children. She completed her undergraduate degree and medical degree at Loyola University in Chicago. Then, she went on to complete her pediatrics internship, residency, and fellowship at Indiana School of Medicine in Indianapolis. Dr. James joined the team at Riley Hospital for Children in 1999, and has been practicing there since. She specializes in fetal echocardiography and transthoracic and transabdominal children.
The American Medical Association developed a Principles of Medical Ethics to define the essentials of honorable behavior for a physician. Upon review of these principles with Dr. James, she found many of the principles to be straightforward. However, there
…show more content…
James provided multiple examples. Because Dr. James works with children who are unable to consent for themselves, the concept of autonomy can be especially difficult. For example, Dr. James had an eight-year-old patient with a heart rhythm abnormality. The patient was on medicine that kept him stable but had to take the medicine three times a day without fail. Dr. James approached the family about completing an ablation, a procedure that can be done in a catheter lab, that would normalize the heart rhythm. The patient was ecstatic about the idea of not taking medicine anymore. Additionally, Dr. James stated that most kids do not have the same sense of mortality as adults do; they feel invincible. The parents, however, were incredibly nervous and given their son’s stability with medicine, they did not think the added benefits outweighed the risks. Because Dr. James’ patient wanted to go through with the surgery, she said that she felt it was her responsibility to convince the parents by informing …show more content…
James frequently encounters is transplant distribution. Because of the low donor pool and incredibly high need pool, the concept of justice comes in to play, and someone must decide how to distribute the organs. One criterion that has been implemented for children is a social evaluation in which social workers assess a family’s ability to provide the care and resources that a transplant patient requires. In one situation that Dr. James could recall, a twelve-year old needed a heart transplant. The grandparents were the guardians because the parents were both in jail. The evaluation determined that the grandparents were too old and could not fully provide for the child’s needs post-operation, and the boy was not listed. Outraged, Dr. James could not accept this answer and fought for the boy’s placement with a foster family. Eventually, they did find a foster family that was willing to take on the responsibilities and the boy received a heart. He is alive today. Dr. James groaned that while she can intellectually understand the need for these guidelines, when dealing with real patients, this issue is the hardest for her to ethically
Autonomy is a concept found in moral, political, and bioethical reasoning. Inside these connections, it is the limit of a sound individual to make an educated, unpressured decision. Patient autonomy can conflict with clinician autonomy and, in such a clash of values, it is not obvious which should prevail. (Lantos, Matlock & Wendler, 2011). In order to gain informed consent, a patient
Sarah Cullen and Margaret Klein, “Respect for Patients, Physicians, and the Truth,” in L. Vaughn, Bioethics: 148-55
The case of Marguerite M presents an ethical dilemma. Medical ethics play a special role in medicine and is directly concerned with its practice. Its role has continued to evolve as changes develop in
Siegler, M., and W. Winslade. "Ethics in Medicine." Clinical Ethics. By A. R. Jonsen. 7th ed. N.p.:
Principles of Biomedical Ethics, by Tom Beauchamp and James F. Childress, has for many critics in medical ethics exemplified the worse sins of "principlism." From its first edition, the authors have argued for the importance and usefulness of general principles for justifying ethical judgments about policies and cases in medical ethics. The organization of their book reflects this conviction, dividing discussion of particular ethical problems under the rubrics of the key ethical principles which the authors believe should govern our moral judgments: principles of autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence and justice.
9) Wall, L.L. (2006). The medical ethics of Dr J Marion Sims: a fresh look at the historical record. Journal of Medical Ethics, 32(6), 346-350. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.012559
Veatch, Robert M.,"The Normative Principles of Medical Ethics." In Medical ethics. 1997. Reprint, Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett, 1989 29-56.
Slosar, J. P. (2004). Ethical decisions in health care. Health Progress. pp. 38-43. Retrieved from http://www.chausa.org/publications/health-progress/article/january-february-2004/ethical-decisions-in-health-care
There are questions about transplant allocation in regards to the four major ethical principles in medical ethics: beneficence, autonomy, nonmaleficence and justice. Beneficence is the “obligation of healthcare providers to help people” that are in need, autonomy is the “right of patients to make choices” in regards to their healthcare, nonmaleficence, is the “duty of the healthcare providers to do no harm”, and justice is the “concept of treating everyone in a fair manner” ("Medical Ethics & the Rationing of Health Care: Introduction", n.d., p. 1).
Judson, K, & Harrison, C. (2010). Law & ethics for medical careers. New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Jecker, N. (1990). Integrating medical ethics with normative theory: Patient advocacy and social responsibility. 11(2), 125-139.
Professionalism is an adherence to a set of values comprising both a formally agreed-upon code of conduct and the informal expectations of colleagues, clients and society. The key values include acting in a patient's interest, responsiveness to the health needs of society, maintaining the highest standards of excellence in the practice of medicine and in the generation and dissemination of knowledge. In addition to medical knowledge and skills, medical professionals should present psychosocial and humanistic qualities such as caring, empathy, humility and compassion, as well as social responsibility and sensitivity to people's culture and beliefs. All these qualities are expected of members of highly trained professions.
As with every code of ethics the Physician Assistant profession has revised its code of ethics to keep with the changing times in the medical field. Four main bioethical principles broadly guided the development of these guidelines: autonomy, beneficence, no maleficence, and justice.3This Physician Assistant (PA) should follow the do no harm rule, understand the patient has the right to make decisions about their care, always act in the best interest of the patient, and treat all the patients the same and make sure care is consistent for every
Macklin R. (2003). Applying the Four Principles, Journal of Medical Ethics; 29: p.275-280 doi:10.1136/jme.29.5.275.retrieved from http:// jme.bmj.com/content/29/5/275.full
McGee, Glenn and Arthur L. Caplan. "Medical Ethics." Microsoft® Encarta® 98 Encyclopedia. © 1993-1997: Microsoft Corporation. CD-ROM.