Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Theories of economic growth essay
Capitalism and its effects on society
Effect of industrialization in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Theories of economic growth essay
Following the development of capitalism, the 19th century’s industrialization brought a new era to the human society. Factory electrification, mass production and the production line ran to human civilization with their powers. While people were excited about the innovations of capitalism, Herbert Marcuse gave his argument, which capitalism destroyed nature and the human nature. Edward Hopper (1882-1967), a prominent American realist painter and printmaker, also showed his personal perspective about the modern American life under capitalism through his artworks. The painting Nighthawks, which was painted in 1942 by Edward Hopper, reflects Marcuse’s argument that capitalism destroys the human nature through emotions of people and color contrasts.
In “Nature and Revolution”, Marcuse tells us that capitalism destroys external nature and human nature. External nature is our environment. Marcuse mentions, nature is a part of history, “man encounters nature as transformed by society, subjected to a specific rationality which became, to an ever-increasing extent, technological, instrumental rationality, bent to the requirements of capitalism” (260). That is, human beings force nature to become tools for the purpose of the development. The increasing of technology and industrialization transform nature into man-controlled resources. In order to achieve the growth of human society, nature has been transformed from nature into an environment for the human beings. To specify his argument, he writes, “Commercialized nature, polluted nature, militarized nature cut down the life environment of man, not only in an ecological but also in a very existential sense” (260). From this quote, he explains that nature has lost its origins in a visible le...
... middle of paper ...
...ert Marcuse argues that capitalism destroys natural environment and human nature, Edward Hopper’s painting Nighthawks reflects Marcuse’s argument that capitalism destroys nature through color contrasts and the unnatural environment; it also echoes Marcuse’s argument that capitalism destroys the human nature through emotionless people. While the growth of capitalism brings new technology to human society, the dehumanized power starts to destroy nature and human nature. Indeed, civilization brings human society up to a new level. Yet, the way of the growth destroys our natural environment and human nature. We should find a better way of expansion that can keep developing and protecting nature at a same time.
Works Cited
Marcuse, Herbert. "Nature and Revolution." The Continental Aesthetics Reader. Ed. Clive
Cazeaux. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2011. 258-269. Print.
In American Colossus: The Triumph of Capitalism, 1865 - 1900, H.W. Brands worked to write a book that illustrates the decades after the Civil War, focusing on Morgan and his fellow capitalists who effected a stunning transformation of American life. Brands focuses on the threat of capitalism in American democracy. The broader implications of focusing on capitalism in American democracy is the book becomes a frame work based on a contest between democracy and capitalism. He explains democracy depends on equality, whereas, capitalism depends on inequality (5). The constant changing of the classes as new technologies and ways of life arise affect the contest between democracy and capitalism. By providing a base argument and the implications of the argument, Brands expresses what the book attempts to portray. Through key pieces of evidence Brands was able to provide pieces of synthesis, logical conclusion, and countless
A corporation was originally designed to allow for the forming of a group to get a single project done, after which it would be disbanded. At the end of the Civil War, the 14th amendment was passed in order to protect the rights of former slaves. At this point, corporate lawyers worked to define a corporation as a “person,” granting them the right to life, liberty and property. Ever since this distinction was made, corporations have become bigger and bigger, controlling many aspects of the economy and the lives of Americans. Corporations are not good for America because they outsource jobs, they lie and deceive, and they knowingly make and sell products that can harm people and animals, all in order to raise profits.
In the mid-nineteenth century, the United States heralded the coming of the “new industrial order.” With the advent of railroads, industrialization went into full swing. Factories and mills appeared and multiplied, and the push for economic progress became the grand narrative of the country. Still, there was a conscious effort to avoid the filth and poverty so prevalent in European factory towns. Specifically, the town of Lowell, Massachusetts, was held up as an exemplary model of industrial utopia. The mill town included beautiful landscaping and dormitories for the women workers. Indeed, it looked much like a university campus (Klein 231). Nevertheless, this idealized vision eventually gave way to the reality of human greed. The female factory workers worked long hours for little pay as their health deteriorated from the hazardous conditions (238). (Specifically, Carson’s Mill in Dalton, Massachusetts, served as the model for Melville’s short story [Melville 2437].) In this way, industrialization (and the subsequent desire for economic wealth) became incompatible with democratic principles. Originally, the prevailing consciousness was that industrialization would further democracy and the two would become a complimentary pair. However, the reality was that these societal changes brought economic divisions; the boundaries were drawn more clearly between the privileged class and the working class.
... position is very radical. He thinks civilization has brought disorder and has distance the human beings from nature. It is true that the ambition to dominate the planet has caused some people to destroy natural resources, increase the levels of contamination and lose the respect for our own nature. However, I cannot disregard all the progresses that humans have done through out the years, which have helped improve the quality of our life. The respect for nature has to continue along with the growth of our knowledge.
...lley’s ideology that neglecting nature due to man’s desires is destructive. Yet Scott presents nature as a status symbol, Zhora’s snake that ‘once corrupted man’ holding biblical allusions to man’s expulsion from the Garden of Eden. Scott thus develops Shelley’s principle further as the ‘City of Angels’ ironic entitlement reflects our pessimistic future, premising the capitalist degeneration of our world due to man’s desires since the Romantic enlightenment in Shelley’s period.
...prosperity. It does not allow for emotional and ideological growth, as money-oriented assets do not always acclimate to physically intangible desires. Hamilton’s work stresses the notion that the capitalist media disillusions the American dream; Fitzgerald is more so certain it stems from human elitism and social pressures. Showcasing that ideologies should be questioned as to the legitimacy of its source and function, serve to inform our current society that we must watch what we chase. The accumulation of opinions leads to revelations. The unrest and discomfort voiced by both are societal stimulation, had they stayed quiet perhaps society would have gone about living lavishly and selfishly. The pressures regarding the importance of epiphanies create change. Modern society is itself due in part by educated deductions realized and voiced during the 20th century.
Capitalism continues to be a revolutionary form of social organization. Modes of production, the ordering of daily activities, and the material practices and processes of social reproduction have undergone numerous changes since capitalism’s inception. Mapping a history of capitalism’s different stages and forms – both social and institutional – would be an arduous task, complicated by the fact that in each of capitalism’s stages, features and characteristics of past and future stages abound. Nevertheless, the current form of capitalism marks a unique departure from previous stages. Euphemisms and catchphrases concerning late 20th century capitalism have become all too common. "Globalization" has become a catchphrase for academics, journalists, and citizens alike. However, many of the claims about a new, distinguishable form of capitalist organization – a "post-Fordist" or "flexible" system of accumulation – are overstated. Despite the dominance of Neoliberalism following the collapse of Fordism, the current epoch does not occasion an economically, environmentally, or socially sustainable regime of accumulation. In this paper I will explain, drawing from the Regulation School, the shift from Fordism to what many have termed "post-Fordism," and use this analysis to suggest future routes for capitalist organization. Indeed, until a socially reproducible compromise to Neo-liberalism is found, aggressive competition and regulatory undercutting will further amplify destructive business cycles, abject poverty, and environmental destruction.
How does Kafka Comment on 20th Century Capitalism Throughout the Novel and what Symbolism does he Use to Depict it
In the final chapter of Patel and Moore’s A History of the World in Seven Cheap Things, they came to the conclusion that all of the ‘cheap things’ that created capitalism have an interlocking relationship with not only economic processes, but the ecological as well. Since the beginning of capitalistic approach, the world itself became a cheap mine. Even to this day, it is being exploited and constantly drained from its natural resources. With the resource being the center of capitalism, cheap food, care, lifes, money, nature, and work all begin to develop. In order to keep everything in place, violence and constant dehumanization of the human work had to be displayed. The profit from a commodity can not be obtained until something or someone is exploited and used up indefinitely.
Rebecca Harding Davis’ “Life in the Iron Mills” captures the nature of capitalism, documenting its inner workings and how a capitalist enterprise—in the context of the story, the factory—gains a consciousness. Davis also explores the nature of this enterprise consciousness, whether it’s something human or an anonymous god-like consciousness. In exploring the nature of a capitalist enterprise gaining consciousness, Davis speaks to the objectification and emotional deprivation of the workers, while giving emotional qualities to the machines. The similarities between the workers’ likely emotions and the machines’ emotions indicate the nature of capitalism to take individual consciousness and give it to the capitalist enterprise (the factory system),
The Industrial Revolution of the 19th century brought about profound changes in transportation, technology, and economics. Members of society reaped tremendous benefits from the abundance of innovations that arose during the period. The invention of new machinery paved the way for mass production, and allowed once burdensome tasks to be accomplished quickly. at record speeds. Yet certain individuals became skeptical of the consequences of such rapid development. Numerous artists, writers and philosophers, worried that induexstrialization would destroy the connection of humankind to the natural world. American poets such as Henry David Thoreau, began to praise nature as a source of healthy emotions, ideas and morality. By contrast, they condemned
The American stock market took a turn for the worse in 1929. This infamous crash left many Americans monetarily starved. This is poverty is seen in stories such as As I Lay Dying by William Faulkner and “Babylon Revisited” by F. Scott Fitzgerald. However, Americans were poor long before the Great Depression. The Modernist movement, which began during the conclusion of the First World War, displays the way postwar Americans experienced an absence in their lives. They no longer felt as though they could find solace in their religion or in their communities. The War had destroyed everything. In As I Lay Dying and “Babylon Revisited”, the theme of poverty is used to represent the absence that Americans were feeling during the Modernist movement.
There are negative consequences of that prevailing ideology toward nature. Without nature, we cannot create anything; therefore, we cannot survive. “The worker can create nothing without nature, without the sensuous external world. It is the material in which his labor realizes itself…” (Marx 325) However, as we create things from nature, we lose direct contact with nature itself. We are only exposed to the things we made. “In a physical sense man lives only from these natural products, whether in the form of nourishment, heating, clot...
Bookchin asserts that "deep ecology, [is] formulated largely by privileged male, white academics (Bookchin 243)." Bookchin mentions that some deep ecologists defend seemingly anti-human measures, such as severe population control and the claim regarding the Third World that "the best thing would be to just let nature seek its own balance, to let the people there just starve". Bookchin's second major criticism is that deep ecology fails to link environmental crises with authoritarianism and hierarchy. Social ecologists like him believe that environmental problems are firmly rooted in the manner of human social interaction, and suggest that deep ecologists fail to recognize the potential for human beings to solve environmental issues through a change of cultural attitudes. According to Bookchin, it is a social reconstruction alone that "can spare the biosphere from virtual destruction (Anarchy Archives)." Though some deep ecologists may reject the argument that ecological behavior is rooted in the social paradigm, others, in fact, embrace this argument, such as the adherents to the deep ecologist movement Deep Green Resistance. Bookchin calls capitalism the disease of society echoing Naess’ complaints that the entire system must be changed for the benefit of people and the planet both. It is not so much the solutions they disagree upon, but how the problem and method of solving it are
Throughout history, many individuals wish to discover and explain the relationship between nature and society, however, there are many complexities relating to this relationship. The struggle to understand how nature and society are viewed and connected derives from the idea that there are many definitions of what nature is. The Oxford dictionary of Human Geography (2003), explains how nature is difficult to define because it can be used in various contexts as well as throughout different time and spaces. As a result of this, the different understandings of what nature is contributes to how the nature society relationship is shaped by different processes. In order to better understand this relation there are many theorists and philosophers