Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Religious capital punishment essay
Death penaltynegative debate
Death penaltynegative debate
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Religious capital punishment essay
Should capital punishment be abolished worldwide?
Introduction:
Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is the execution of an offender sentenced to death after a legal trial. Only if the state imposes capital punishment is the act not considered a murder (BBC, 2014). It is usually a punishment only for particularly serious types of murders, although in some countries, treason, fraud, drug trafficking, adultery and rape are punishable by death.
There are varied methods of execution, including by lethal injection, beheading, hanging, electrocution, and shooting by firing squad.
Analysis/Discussion (Research):
Why is capital punishment a moral issue?
Whether capital punishment is ever morally acceptable has been debated for hundreds
…show more content…
Excluding China, 90% of all executions took place in Iran, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. In Iran, Pakistan, and Maldives, juvenile offenders (individuals charged before their 18th birthday) were either executed or charged with the death penalty, violating International law (Amnesty International, 2016) .
What does Australia say about capital punishment?
Australia abolished the death penalty completely in 1985 – 18 years after the last victim of legal execution in Australia was hanged. The abolition of the death penalty holds bipartisan support in Australia (Australian Human Rights Commission, 2006).
Australia is also firm in its international opposition to the death penalty. An example of this is the Australian effort to prevent the executions of Andrew Chan and Myuran Sukumaran, Australian citizens who were sentenced to death in 2005 for drug trafficking in Indonesia. They were held in prison for 10 years before their execution, but appeared to have rehabilitated dramatically over that period (ABC,
…show more content…
However, religious people may turn to their faiths to additionally guide them in their ethical views.
In Christianity, the Bible can be interpreted to be both for and against capital punishment. Christians for the death penalty say the Bible does not condone the act. They view the commandment “thou shalt not kill” as a warning against murder, and capital punishment is not considered murder. Christians against the death penalty argue that only God should create and destroy life, and that there should be no exceptions to “thou shalt not kill”. They also uphold the fundamental Christian teachings of forgiveness, compassion, and support for preserving life.
The Catholic Church allowed the death penalty for centuries. The Catholic stance began to change under Pope John Paul II’s papacy from 1978 to 2005 (The Guardian, 2015). In February 2016, in a speech to thousands in the Vatican, Pope Francis condemned the death penalty and called for its worldwide abolition. Pope Francis cited the absolute value of the commandment “thou shalt not kill” and called for greater respect of human
Capital Punishment should NOT be abolished, because it is the only punishment that fits the
Since the last execution in Australia in 1967 of Ronald Ryan and the abolition of capital punishment in Australia in 1973 imprisonment has been the only option as a sanction for murder. A survey conducted in 2009 demonstrated that a clear majority of Australians (64%) believed that imprisonment should be the punishment for murder as opposed to 23% stating the death penalty should be used and 13% did not wish to comment. The death penalty is not an effective punishment for all cases and there has not been any solid evidence stating that it is a more effective deterrent than imprisonment. Furthermore capital punishment possesses the risk of executing the innocent, which has happened or almost happened numerous times in the past such as Colin Ross. The death penalty is also a breach of the Universal Human Rights. Additionally although there is belief that detaining criminals actually costs taxpayers more due to court processes, the method of execution and many other factors. While imprisonment should be the highest sanction for crime, in some cases this is not effective, such as the case of Australian serial killer Peter Dupas. As a result, imprisonment is the only appropriate option for murder in majority of instances, however in some cases it is evident that capital punishment is necessary for the safety of society.
(1996). Volume 2, Sixth Edition, Australian Geographic: New South Wales. 8. Victory, M. (2004). End of the Line- Capital Punishment in Australia, CIS Publishers: Victoria.
Travelling around the world, this paper presents the various religious perspectives evidenced in recent actions taken regarding the death penalty.
Guernsey, J. B. (2010). Death penalty: fair solution or moral failure. Minneapolis, MN: Lerner Publishing Group, Inc. Retrieved February 8, 2011 from http://books.google.com/books?id=38slHSsFFrgC&pg=PA125&dq=death+penalty+in+other+countries&hl=en&ei=F6dQTZHLBsm_tgfD7rHBCQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CD4Q6AEwBDgU#v=onepage&q=death%20penalty%20in%20other%20countries&f=false
Almost all nations in the world either have the death sentence or have had it at one time. It was used in most cases to punish those who broke the laws or standards that were expected of them. Since the death penalty wastes tax money, is inhumane, and is largely unnecessary it should be abolished in every state across the United States. The use of the death penalty puts the United States in the same category as countries like Iran and Saudi Arabia which are two of the world’s worst human rights violators (Friedman 34). Lauri Friedman quotes, “Executions simply inject more violence into an already hostile American society.”
There are more than one hundred countries who have abolished the death penalty in law or
The death penalty or some prefer to call it capital punishment has been around since 1608. During the foundation of our country there were twelve death – eligible crimes of the Massachusetts Bay Colony and they were as follows: idolatry, witchcraft, blasphemy, murder, manslaughter, poisoning, bestiality, sodomy, adultery, man stealing , false witness in capital cases and conspiracy & rebellion. While some are absolutely for it and some are absolutely against it there is one factor that comes into play on both sides of the argument and that factor is religion. Many people will state that there is or should be a line between church and state however religion has and will always play a major role in ones conceptual thinking as to what is right and as to what is wrong what is moral and what is immoral. Despite the fact that people would rather think or rationalize without involving religion is nearly impossible. “By virtually any definition, religion involves a central concern with making sense of life and death. The American legal system, rooted in Judeo-Christian ethics, routinely confronts issues that test our basic assumptions about the meaning and sanctity of life and about the role of the State in shaping and sustaining such meanings” (Young,1992).
He starts with addressing capital punishment. He stated that we should not ignore that life is a gift and argued that we should treat criminals with kindness and not allow their sinful actions to make us commit sin ourselves. Instead, he asks that we rehabilitation of criminals for the sake of peace and justice. The Pope also speaks on abortion and the death penalty, he speaks of the golden rule. "
Capital punishment goes against almost every religion. Isolated passages of religious scripture have been quoted in support of the death penalty, almost all religious groups in the United States regard executions as immoral. There is no credible evidence that capital punishment deters crime from the streets in America. Scientific studies have consistently failed to demonstrate that executions deter people from committing crime anymore than long prison sentences. Moreover, states without the death penalty have much lower murder rates. Executions are carried out at staggering cost to taxpayer.The funds spent for execution should be used to target the issue of killing and find solutions to help communities unite to demonstrate a more peaceful environment. Recent CNN reported how studies done have found that the death penalty criminal litigation, costs taxpayers far more than seeking life without parole. (CNN, 2015) The states spends millions of dollars to put away death row inmates when the funds could be used to help channel society in tune with how to become more positive and getting help to those who need
Death Penalty The death penalty was a law that used to be in Australia the law was if you committed a bad enough you would be executed for your crime committed. The last person to be executed in Australia was 2 February 1967 when Ronald Ryan was hung in Melbourne for shooting a prison guard during an escape attempt. Queensland was the first to abolish the death penalty in 1922 and NSW was the last in 1985. The social cohesion in the death penalty is the public were against the death penalty and the social progression is that we have moved forward to get rid of a law that is old fashion
In contrast, people who are in favor of the death penalty use the words of the Bible in their defense; Genesis 6:9 says "whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed" (Capital Punishment). However, the death penalty breaks the sixth commandment and isn’t morally right. Executing people for their crimes is immoral and disobeys God, the creator of
A contentious issue in current debate is the death penalty and its application in society. The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, occurs when a individual is punished by execution as a consequence of an offence they committed (Taylor, 2014). Although Australia does not practice the death penalty, many countries continue to employ it as a means of justice and uphold its value in society. The death penalty debate is a multifaceted issue, encompassing many aspects of society including ethics and morality, the judicial system, and politics and the economy. It will be argued that the death penalty is a morally dubious and obsolete practice that is no longer relevant in modern judiciary, as it breaches the inviolable human right to life. Ethics and morality are primary arguments for both supporting and opposing the death penalty, as some individuals believe that the death penalty is a immoral practice and others consider that it can be morally justified when prolific crimes are committed. Punishment is fundamental element to any legal system as a means of justice and ensuing that the offender is unable to commit additional crimes; however, in the case of the death penalty there can be dire consequences if the legal system is wrong. Politics and the economy are also greatly influenced by the death penalty as they determine if the practice is maintained. The death penalty breaches a number of human rights laws and some individuals support that it is immoral; however, others consider it to be justifiable due to the heinous actions of the offender.
Capital Punishment is a controversial topic discussed in today's society. Capital punishment is often not as harsh in other countries as we may call harsh in our country. There is a heated debate on whether states should be able to kill other humans or not. But if we shall consider that other countries often have more deadly death penalties than we do. People that are in favor of the death penalty say that it saves money by not paying for housing in a maximum prison but what about our smaller countries that abide by the rule of the capital punishment. If one were to look at the issues behind capital punishment in an anthropological prospective than one would see that in some cases no one would assume that capital punishment here in the U.S. is bad. Now those opposed say that it is against the constitution, and is cruel and unusual punishment for humans to be put to his or her death. I believe that the death penalty is against the constitution and is cruel and unusual punishment. The death penalty is cruel because you cannot punish anyone worse than by killing them. It is an unusual punishment because it does not happen very often and it should not happen at all. Therefore, I think that capital punishment should be abolished, everywhere.
Capital punishment is the punishment of death for a crime given by the state. It is used for a variety of crimes such as murder, drug trafficking and treason. Many countries also have the death penalty for sexual crimes such as rape, incest and adultery. The lethal injection, the electric chair, hanging and stoning are all methods of execution used throughout the world. Capital punishment has been around since ancient times; it was used in ancient Rome, and one of the most famous people to be crucified was Jesus Christ. Capital punishment is now illegal in many countries, like the United Kingdom, France and Germany, but it is also legal in many other countries such as China and the USA. There is a large debate on whether or not capital punishment should be illegal all over the world as everyone has a different opinion on it. In this essay, I will state arguments for and against the death penalty, as well as my own opinion: capital punishment should be illegal everywhere.