Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why non-violence is better than violence
Why non-violence is better than violence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The natural state of human is not war. It is crucial to understand that the environment is the one that triggers the murderous state in humans. As years passed by and society progressed, the act of murder and violence has significantly decreased. The article argues that a combination of the mind and evolution tend to have a profound effect on how violence is impacted in society. Similarly, Candide relates to the point of the argument because of how inevitable and easy violence and murder forms in the novel. There were many instances where a large attack by burglars and mobs that simply wanted to cause misery to Candide and Cunegonde. The article correlates the way the capacity of murder tends to thrive in a man to the instances of mass murder committed in Candide. The article mentions the thought process of evolutionary psychologists to demonstrate the justification of murderous actions in the …show more content…
“Men are not just more likely to kill other people than women are, they are also more likely to do so in groups — and for some researchers it is in these realms that killing offers real evolutionary value.” In Candide, the example of the burglars being a male group dedicated to going to the wealthy to kill and rob them of money justifies the claim of the male dominant murderers in evolution. Conflict is always derived from two sides of a situation. In this case, the struggle between the upper and lower classes in relation to their wealth and status had came into question. The formation of the burglars was derived from the stimulation of the orbitofrontal cortex. As a result, they feel anger and hatred towards this societal conflict and begin to think violently. This violent thinking leads to a unification towards the idea of murder to the group. Eventually, the benefit outweighs the cost in their minds, and they set out to
Cormac McCarthy’s “Blood Meridian” does a marvelous job of highlighting the violent nature of mankind. The underlying cause of this violent nature can be analyzed from three perspectives, the first being where the occurrence of violence takes place, the second man’s need to be led and the way their leader leads them, and lastly whether violence is truly an innate and inherent characteristic in man.
There have been many reports of serial killings across the globe. These sort of things are revolting and are disturbing to the normal person. But have you ever wondered why people do these despicable acts? What prompts these savage slaughters? Most people have wondered that very thing. There are even popular television shows based on this very topic. Well let me show you the inner workings that make these people tick.
The case of whether serial killers are born with the lust to kill or if they are truly victims of their environment has been a hot debated question by both psychologists and the FBI today. A serial killer is traditionally defined as one that kills 3 or more people at different times with “cooling off” periods in between kills. Both psychological abuse as a child and psychological disorders are to blame for the making of a killer. The nature vs. nurture debate is best applied to the mysterious behaviors and cases of serial killers and their upbringing and environment. Nature is the genetic and biological connections a person has, personality traits, and how genetic make-up all relates to a killer. Nurture is examining the upbringing and environment that a person is around that affects what a person becomes. In some cases however, the effects of only upbringing or only biological problems were the reasons certain serial killers committed crimes. Although there is no definitive answer to what plays the bigger role: nature or nurture, they both are contributing factors that make a serial killer. These deviants of society are afflicted with problems in either their upbringing or have psychological disorders, and are able to blend into our everyday lives with no apparent differences, yet they wreck havoc through their unremorseful killings.
With exaggeration, authors craft their writing to have an even greater, more impactful effect on their audiences. This enhanced effect found in Candide serves the purpose of highlighting how humans adopt a type of absolute viciousness and inhumanity in times of war. One example is the instance where Candide - a member of the Bulgar army, at the time - must choose between being “flogged” by the entirety of the military command, or to endure “twelve bullets in his brain” (24). Here, Candide is given a nonsensical, almost ludicrous, ultimatum. Voltaire offers an embellished example that serves to demonstrate the barbaric military practices that come with war. Being a recurring aspect of war, Candide is, essentially, forced to choose between death and death. In fact, along with exaggeration, Voltaire satirizes war even further as the choice of whether it be a gradual or speedy demise is Candide’s own luxury. Voltaire does not just simply antagonize the ramifications of war, but rather, he ridicules all facets of war. Another example within Candide is when the Old Woman reveals the story of her own life as proof of the grim hardship that she too has experienced. In the midst of another battle, “one buttock” was cut off of the live bodies of every woman present in the interest of feeding the starving soldiers (56).
While many factors can be reported to showcase the reasons why an individual would be led to such violence, ethology remains the single most accurate theory in explaining the many facets of gang violence by showing the parallels between animal behavior and the lifestyle of gang members. Ethology also attempts to explain the violence exhibited by humans as corresponding to violence displayed by animals. For predatory animals, violence is necessary for survival and adaptation to the surroundings is vital. Genetically humans are closest to chimpanzees, which “routinely engage in murder, assassination, rape, raid...
Serial killers are defined to “be driven by instinct and desire to kill.” In a study done in 2000, Dr, Richard Davidson says, “people with a large amount of aggression – in particular people who have committed aggressive murders or have a social disorder – have almost no brain activity in the orbital frontal cortex or the anterior cingulated cortex while activity in the amyglade continued perfectly. The orbital frontal cortex and the anterior congulated cortex control emotional impulses while the amyglade controls reactions to fear.” Davidson concludes his research claiming that although environment can and will affect a serial killer’s thoughts, it is a killer’s genetic makeup that inevitably creates murderous thoughts.
Candide presents a very interesting dynamic with the protagonist that bears its name. Candide, the protagonist, is said to be a joyful and pure soul, yet goes on murder sprees on more than one occasion. This moral paradox is addressed directly by Candide himself, who can’t seem to understand his behavior either. The article, “Human Behaviour: Killer Instincts” may just explain that.
...iments of low self-regard, disgrace, and deficiency. This is the point at which the seed of retribution is planted. From an early age serial killers vent their fury, jealousy, and dismissal from an early age towards defenseless casualties, for example, creatures, as they become out of this stage they swing to vent toward honest people that look like the tormentors of their initial life. Pre-oedipal in the family unit is the thing that separates serial killers structure other physically manhandled youngsters; this is the key element to maniacal fury. Serial killers make their casualties feel what they felt as youngsters, henceforth the examples of slaughters from a little child to a grown-up. In the wake of being de-railed as kids, the enslavement of control in playing "GOD" in another person 's life is the thing that drives serial killers into an extreme force rage.
He lets his passion for his beloved to blind his morals. Similarly, Dan Jones finds that, “murderous actions are usually the by-product of urges towards some other goal” (Human Behavior: Killer Instincts). In both cases, violent actions are not instinct, but rather just an unfortunate result of something else. For Candide, that something else is his undying love for Cunégonde. His devotion to her blinds his moral consciousness and leads his down a path of violence. Dan Jones also says that, “humans have repeatedly encountered a wide range of situations in which the benefits of killing another person outweighed the costs” (Human Behavior: Killer Instincts). Inline with that thought process of the “human adaption theory”, Candide found that killing the men that own Cunégonde leads to greater benefits than what he will have to endure due to his violent behavior. For example, he is willing to be constantly on the run and is willing to never step into certain countries all for his hope to someday marry Cunégonde. He was willing to kill Cunégonde’s brother, her last piece of family and his only hope for a blessing to their
Biological theory is the concept that focuses on certain biological characteristics that are thought to be associated with an increased risk of engaging in criminal or deviant behavior (Bernard, Snipes & Gerould, 2010). Early biological theories tended to focus on the physical appearance as a distinguishing trait of criminals, whereas modern theories primarily argue that biology is one of many factors that contribute toward criminal behavior (Bernard, Snipes & Gerould, 2010). Early rape theorist included that of Johan Lavater, Fran’s...
Over the course of history, violence amongst men has shaped the world in which we live through wars, political protests, or social conflicts. Sadly, enough, this is a factor of human nature which resides in all individuals and cannot be controlled or avoided. Not only have these events of man’s inhumanity been documented, but they have also become the underlying theme for many well known works of literature. Both Golding and Wiesel shed light on the immorality of mankind’s actions by putting it under close scrutiny, leaving the reader left to wonder how human beings are capable of so callously hurting and killing one another.
The hideous scars of murder and crime are doused in the blood, tears, and cries of hopeless victims. Malicious villains slaughter, lie, and steal with little thoughts of emotion or rationality. According to Genevan philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau, the great evil found in these criminals and murderers lie within the pure faults of society. His opinion highly contrasts the ideas of esteemed author William Golding who believes that malevolence is a distinctive part of human nature. Despite these insightful approaches into the nature of humankind, I truly believe that Rousseau’s theory on humanity creates a more reasonable argument.
Early on in the modern stages of the analysis of crime, many different explanations have been given for reasons as to why humans may take part in crime. It has been shown through records that the first methods of punishment would be to take part in private revenge cases where family and friends would have each other killed, this would more
In these cases, the culprits were seemingly normal people that displaced their aggression on innocent bystanders for a variety of reasons. What is the cause of this unleashed aggression toward society? How can we come to explain such acts of aggression and violence? Are they a result of societal influences, or are some individuals biologically predisposed to crime? This paper attempts to analyze some of the prevailing theories of aggression. The theories can be classified into three groups: innate or biological theories, drive theories and social learning theories. In light of the evidence produced for each, it is my goal to formulate a conclusion about which particular theory seems most substantiated and reasonable.
There are various theories within the biological explanation as to why individuals commit criminal behaviour, these include: genetic theory, hereditary theory, psychosis and brain injury theory. In the next few paragraphs examples of each will be shown.