Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Tort of negligence
Engineers, contractors, and other businesses must be mindful of and knowledgeable of their legal obligations when performing their occupation or supplying a product. Negligence in the design or construction of a product that results in damage or bodily harm, or could result in damage or bodily harm, can result in liability for economic loss under Canadian Tort law. Engineers, architects, and contractors need to be respectful of their duty of care to ensure their product is precisely produced with no danger of negligence. In 1972, Bird Construction Company Limited entered into a contract with Tuxedo Properties Company Limited of Winnipeg. Bird Construction was the general contractor responsible for building a 15-storey apartment building using the plans designed by Smith Carter Partners, the architects who also had a contractual agreement with Tuxedo Properties (Herschorn, 1996, p. 109). Bird Construction then subcontracted the masonry work to Kornovski & Keller Masonry Limited. The project was completed in 1974. Subsequently, in 1978, Winnipeg Condominium Corporation assumed title of the building and converted the apartments to condominiums (see Figure 1). In 1982, Winnipeg Condominium discovered issues with the Tyndal stone on the outside of the building. After consultation, they did some remedial work in an attempt to correct the problem. However, in 1989 a large section of the stone fell off the building from the ninth storey. Winnipeg Condominium then replaced the entire exterior at a cost of over $1.5 million (Herschorn, 1996, p. 110). In 1990, Winnipeg Condominium proceeded to take legal action against Bird Construction, the general contractor; Smith Carter Partners, the architects; and the masonry firm of Kornov... ... middle of paper ... ...rom http://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CDEQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ubclss.org%2FCANs%2FSimon%2520Lin%2520-%2520Torts%2520-%2520Term%25201%2520Long%2520CAN.docx&ei=RNc1U5fCJZCFyQGfwoH4Cg&usg=AFQjCNGdymQlHVWbM2Uk1JqG1LBxIMe2CA&sig2=oOneFlVt8fBbrUQ1tqb4lw MacEwing, J. M. (October 25, 2005). Making Sense of the Recent Case Law. Jenkins Marzban Logan LLP. Retrieved from http://www.jml.ca/wp-content/uploads/publications/Making-Sense-of-the-Recent-Case-Law.pdf Ron Engineering & Construction Eastern Ltd. v. The Queen in Right of Ontario et al. 24 O.R. (2d) 332, 98 D.L.R. (3d) 548. (May 23, 1979). Retrieved from http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onca/doc/1979/1979canlii67/1979canlii67.html The Queen (Ont.) v. Ron Engineering, S.C.R. 111 (January 27, 1981). Retrieved from http://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/2504/index.do
Hall, Kermit L, eds. The Oxford guide to United States Supreme Court decisions New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
The Harvard Law Review Association. (2005). The Debate over Foreign Law in Roper v. Simmons. Harvard Law Review , 119 (1), 103-108.
McIntosh v. Milano, 168 N.J. Super. 466, 483-85, 403 A.2d 500 (Law Div. 1979) – Primary Source
The TD Centre is a landmark of Toronto. It is one of the most recognizable elements of the downtown core. It has gained this status for two main reasons. The first one concerns its historical significance: the complex was one of the first of many skyscrapers built in the international style. The second reason is personified by the individual behind the planning and realization of the project: Mies van der Rohe. The building was the last high-rise the world-famous modernist created and therefore it embodied all of his concepts and beliefs on the international style. The complex as a whole stands out in the multitude of high-rises of the downtown core because of its typical, recognizable and repeated style. The original three point configuration by Mies has been expanded during the years with three new buildings by architectural firm Bregman and Hammond. Those new additions are different in the relationship they create and extend to the original buildings. In approaching the complex a distinct feature becomes clear. The complex itself is an urban extension of the international style. When entering the area both by car and as a pedestrian an individual is not only witness to a number of remarkable buildings but finds himself immersed in a modernist urban space. In this short analysis it is important to pay specific attention both to the type of construction and to the materials used. All of those elements are important in recognizing how the development of the TD Centre in the 60s shaped the architecture of downtown Toronto and became a widely imitated example of managing the public space surrounding a building.
pp. pp. pp Kay, H. H. (2004, Jan). Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Professor of Law.
R. v. Martineau, [1990] 2 SCR 633 (n.d.). In Judgements of the Supreme Court of Canada.
Wrongful convictions in Canada is a very sensitive and disturbing topic that has created concerns as to why individuals are being wrongfully convicted. As people in Canada read about cases involving wrongful conviction, such as Guy Paul Morin, Rubin Carter and David Millguard, it often undermines their faith in the criminal justice system. Tunnel vision, the use of questionable DNA evidence, and eyewitness misidentification are the three main causes of wrongful convictions in Canada. Recognizing and addressing these concerns has led to a reduction in cases of wrongful convictions in Canada.
Some people may say that old buildings are just a waste of space. That select group of people have not seen the magic of turning an eyesore of a building into a true masterpiece. This magic has occurred to the Connellee Hotel in Eastland, Texas. The transformation from an abandoned hotel that was opened back in the late 1920’s to the center that now holds banquets, proms, and weddings is truly astonishing and should be appreciated. The Connellee Hotel is a perfect example of why old buildings should be preserved and not destroyed.
Lorenc+Yoo provided Cousins Properties with spectacular design work for their entry canopies at 191 Peachtree. They brought us in to take the project from concept to reality. Starting from their design sketches we developed mechanical drawings, and then fabricated and installed the finished design on the existing stone-clad building facades.
The town’s largest Aboriginal corporation, the Julalikari Council Aboriginal Corporation, purchased the building, now vandalized and a common play place for area children, eight years ago with federal government grant money designated for community centers and housing, according to the news source.
The following research is based on a case study done by the Urban Land Institute. Preservation Ventures, the project’s original developers, began renovating the five Victorian homes that were already at the site in 1982. To fund this project, Preservation Ventures used the Federal Historic Preservation Tax Credit as a source of equity to redevelop the site's five structures. The Federal Historic Preservation Tax encourages private developers to invest in the rehabilitation of historic buildings. It provides a 20% income tax credit for income producing sites that are “historic certified structures” according to the Secretary of the Interior. By 1986, however, none of the office space had been leased even though the renovations were almost complete. Another financial problem that Preservation Venture's faced was the changes in the federal tax code and regulatory stipulations that made it difficult to secure historic preservation tax credits for rehabilitating structures that had been relocated. These issues ultimately made it clear that they wouldn’t be able to work on the remaining 11 structures. After Preservation
Buildings have been part of human life since the beginning of time, we depend of them to live, learn, grown, for protection and shelter. The decisions we make today will not only affect our future but our surrounding as well. We need buildings to survive the climates of the earth and to live our own lives. Architecture is what nature cannot make, yet it is influenced by the rules of nature, as humans evolved so did our way of thinking, and so did our architecture. Green architecture is a breakthrough in human history, Green Architecture is more a more advanced way of building, it has if the building as a life. The purpose of this essay report is to identify the advantages of green Architecture in Canadian Society and its positive effects on our economy. By illuminating the advantages of these green buildings, we will clarify that green building as opened many doors and new possibilities into the human world.
Under tort law, construction professionals would be held liable for their negligent act or omissions which have breached the duty of care against the third parties. Often in time, an original purchaser of a defective building would be able to institute an action under contract law against the construction professionals with the presence of privity of contract. In the absence of privity of contracts, however, the only remedy available to the third parties would be tort law. Be reminded that the occurrences of building defects are not clearly displayed and its occurrence could surface throughout the lifespan of the building thus making the claim under tort law more complex and the rule of causation is by and large harder to establish. Since transactions in relation to real estate’s trading often take place in Singapore, issue arisen as to the rights of the subsequent buyers who purchased the property through the original purchaser which do not have a direct contract with the developer and contractor. Thus, under the judgment of Bryan v. Maloney.(1995), the Australian High Court decision allows the subsequent purchaser to make a claim through tort in the event of defects. This position is similar to Singapore position and hence, a remedy that would have for the subsequent purchaser in the event of
The code says that engineers should always be aware that their first responsibility is to protect public safety, health and welfare. If their judgment is rejected in circumstances where under threat security, health, property or welfare of the people, they must notify the employer or client, and, if necessary, other authorities.