Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Do Canadians have a heart for peacekeeping
Do Canadians have a heart for peacekeeping
Essays on impact peacekeeping operations on national security
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Do Canadians have a heart for peacekeeping
Since 1947, Canada has deployed over 120,000 troops to dozens of countries around the world to aid with United Nations peacekeeping efforts. For almost seventy years we have, as a nation, sent our men and women to five continents, on more than fifty missions. Peacekeeping is part of who we are as Canadians, a part of our national identity. However, in the past decade, we have not participated in a single new UN peacekeeping mission. This is an embarrassment, considering the advantages of peacekeeping operations: They restore stability to regions, halt human rights violations, and even rescue civilians in mortal danger. With distinct benefits such as these, Canada must continue these incredibly important peacekeeping operations.
Firstly, United
…show more content…
These violations include murder, rape, unlawful detainment, and even torture. An appropriate example would be the United Nations mission in East-Timor, in 1999. This mission’s primary objective was to stop the human rights violations perpetrated by Indonesia and Pro-Indonesian militias. Indonesia seized this Portuguese colony in 1975 after the fall of the Portuguese Marcello Caetano dictatorship. The Indonesian rule was oppressive. Hundreds of thousands of displacements took place, with an estimated 61,400 happening in 1975 alone, according to “The Profile of Human Rights violations in Timor-Leste, 1974-1999”. In 1999 the territory, frustrated with the violent rule, held a referendum, from which they gained independence from Indonesia. As terrifying news of killings came out and reached the mainstream media, the UN launched the International Force for East-Timor, or INTERFET. Canada was integral in this operation; providing 250 troops, two Hercules aircraft, the HMCS Protecteur, and Sea King helicopters. Canada patrolled the area, conducted humanitarian aid exercises, repaired schools and hospitals, and even taught English to civilians. It was later revealed that torture and detainment were rampant in the territory. Also revealed was the chilling grand total of killings: 18,600. Had Canada and the United Nations not intervened, East-Timor would still be terrorized by these militias. In this case Canada, along with its allies, successfully proved that it is essential that we must not cease our duties as international police as they can prevent continued human rights
The years since the Battle of Vimy Ridge may have passed quickly, but the legacy of the Canadians whose accomplishments were great in that pivotal First World War battle lives on. Many people claim to this day that Canada came of age as a country on those hard April days in 1917. At first, through the meticulous planning of the battle, the world saw a nation capable of working together and making decisions as a team. Afterwards, with the range of technical and tactical innovations involved in the attack, the world saw a strong nation unafraid to protect and defend. In the end, through great sacrifice the world bore witness to the birth of the Canadian legacy.
Canadians strongly believe that peacekeeping is about trying to protect people from extreme harm, a way of providing hope in situations that seem hopeless, and a good method of bringing peace and justice to war-torn countries or failed states. Canadians backing soldiers in their peacekeeping role has been so strong for such a long time that it has generated into their national identity. “Canadians cling to the mythology, born of the 1956 Suez Crisis, that we are a nation of peacekeepers, interposing between belligerent forces bent on war but, even though Canadian government officials and media of the 1990s called the operations in Bosnia and Somalia “peacekeeping missions,” they were something very different from Cold War-era peacekeeping.” Accordingly, over the past several decades, Canadian peacekeeping operations involving their military forces has shifted from a Pearson perspective based on humanitarian intervention to peacekeeping missions entailing massive violence. Therefore, my research paper will focus on how peacekeeping in the Canadian context has changed over the past several decades owing to the Canadian use of its military (internationally) force for extreme violence during peacekeeping missions. I wish to discuss this topic extensively within my research paper by focusing on vivid examples from UN Peacekeeping missions.
... nation. In addition to, supporting their allies, this shows how Canada is committed to maintain good alliances with their allies. They also joined a peacekeeping military defense with United States in order to gain trust from United States and become a peacekeeping military defense Canada is recognized today.
Canada refused to participate in the Suez canal crisis, “this action was a symbolic gesture that showed both England and the World that Canada was now a fully autonomous nation in total control of its foreign policy” (http://mrmillerss11.blogspot.ca/2010/02/feb-24-canadas-autonomy-timeline.html) . To stop any violence that would soon abrupt Lester. B.Pearson came up with the idea of “peacekeeping”. He stated “We are now emerging into an age when different civilizations will have to learn to live side by side in peaceful interchange, learning from each other, studying each other’s history and ideals, art and culture, mutually enriching each other’s lives. »
In the book entitled Canada, NATO and The Bomb: The Western Alliance in Crisis by Tom Keating and Larry Pratt the main issue discussed was Canada’s position in Europe, North America and their view on the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. It went into specific issues dealing with political tension within Canada and tension outside Canada with other countries. It went through the years of different political parties and how they dealt with the matters of NATO.
Canada’s eligibility to participate on the world stage and its move towards independence was proven after the accomplishments at the Battle of Vimy Ridge. Foremost, Canada’s first opportunity to partake on the world stage came soon after the end of World War I, during the Paris Peace Conference. The accomplishments of the Canadian Army in the Battle of Vimy Ridge helped to earn Canada a spot in the Paris Peace Conference, after long arguments made on behalf of Canada by Prime Minister Robert Broden . The Prime Minister argued that Canada’s wartime record had earned Canada a seat separate from Britain. Canada was granted the seat despite the disapproval of the American President, Woodrow Wilson’s as they contributed greatly to the Allied forces especially in the Battle of Vimy Ridge. The approval of Canada’s seat is important to both the significance of the Battle of Vimy Ridge and the eligibility to participate on the world stage because it was one of the first steps Canada took towards its independence from Great Britain. Additionally, Canada became more social with other countries separate from Britain after the Battle of Vimy Ridge. Canada involved itself more in trading after the battle and the war, and had a flourishing...
...in reasons that most political violence occurs, and how to resolves these conflicts of political violence. After the research was completed, it is very apparent that Canada has had a very positive impact on Afghanistan. There are not many countries who would continue to stay in the country after completing their time in battle. Although Canada was involved in the war against Afghanistan, the country itself still found it mandatory for troops to continue to serve in Afghanistan as peace makers. Canada is known for peace and freedom and this exemplifies just that. Canada is putting forth time, effort, and money, to improve the living conditions of those in Afghanistan and helping them build a sustainable, peaceful life that they can carry out for years to come. Every country will have its own corruption; the answer is to begin from the basics. Peace and security.
As I have already stated Canada is very well known for our many peacekeeping efforts. This is due to the many places our peacekeepers have been, or are at this very moment, such as Bosnia, East Timor and even Central Africa. These are just a very small portion of the places our peacekeepers are presently stationed. I am not even mentioning the dozens and dozens of other places they have been to. Our peacekeepers have helped save countless lives and Canada has gained relatively little in return, but Canada does it anyways, because it is the right thing to do.
Throughout the Cold War, Canada's role immediately progressed into the peacekeeping country that it is known as today through their commitment in the, Pearson and the Suez Crisis, Bosnia and Rwanda and the Cuban Missile Crisis.
... support, so it can help unite the country. Despite all these benefits, Canadian contributions to UN peacekeeping missions have halted as of late, which contributes to its waning global reputation.Peacekeeping has the ability to place Canada on a pedestalin the eyes of the world, because it is a project that is supported by many influential nations such as the United States (U.S. Department of State, 2010) and Australia (Australian War Memorial, 2011). Peacekeeping is too strongly rooted in Canadian history for it to completely disappear. Canada’s declining global reputation should be interpreted as a sign to respond to the call of arms. Peacekeeping represents all the things Canada traditionally represents; fairness, equity, acceptance and human rights. It is the perfect way to symbolize to the world at large that Canada is a diplomatic nation, worth listening to.
Canada is one of the many founders of the UN and was crucial to growth of the organization. According to the UN, Canada was one of the founding countries and participated in countless international affairs ever since. Canada participated in peacekeeping activities, humanitarian crisis support and many other roles in cooperation with the other UN members. Canada became a world power now, dealing in world issues in the UN. Canada has also participated actively in the UNICEF and activities regarding the support of other nations along with Canadian aid. According to UNICEF, Canada joined in 1955 and remained an active member, providing both staff, equipment and money up and will persist to for the future. Canada has set itself up as a model for
Canada has played a vital role in international relations for the majority of its 144 year history since the signing of Confederation in 1867. Canada first participated in World War I, then World War II in 1939-1945. Following World War II, Canada was also involved in the Korean War. Canada has been primarily a peacekeeping nation. There are many questions people ask when a high income country goes to help a lower income nation such as Afghanistan.
Was Canada a warrior or a peacekeeper during the Post War Period? Canada is a member of UN which is an international organization that maintains peace around the world. Although, Canada has played a role as warrior in some cases, such as in the War in Afghanistan, but we’ve mostly played our roles in wars as a peacekeeper. The Rwandan Genocide is a prime example because Canada tried to help stop the bloodshed between the Hutus and the Tutsis. In the Bosnian War Canada and the UN created camps to protect civilians who were trapped in the war. And in the Suez Crisis, Canada’s very own Lester B. Pearson help stop the conflict between the Egyptians and the British/French.
East Timor was ruled by Portugal for about 17 centuries. During World War I, hundreds of East Timorese lost their lives helping Australia forces fight against the Japanese. East Timor was then invaded by Indonesia shortly after Portugal suddenly left in 1975, this was the day after U.S. President Ford’s visit to Indonesia, with what people have suspected as being a green light to invade. At that time, Indonesia had military, economic and political support from countries such as UK, USA and Australia, for various reasons including the oil and gas reserves, a strategic location, various trade and cheap labour related interests. 100,000,000,000 people are said to have been killed since 1975, on third of the entire East Timorese population.
The International Criminal Court was formally established 1 July 2002. “The statue which exercises jurisdiction over four crimes – genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and crimes of aggression (applicable only after a further provision defining aggression and conditions of jurisdiction is adopted).” (Toon, 2004: 1). The ICC is considered to be a court that is a last resort. It was implemented for heinous crimes that are committed to be used when states (countries such as Southeast Asia) are not willing or not able to provide justice for such crimes to the victims. To date, Southeast Asia has only two of their eleven states that have implemented the ICC which are Cambodia and Timor – Leste. Third world countries have a hard time with prioritizing their affairs. With economic hardships, terrorism, and socio-political taking the precedence over justice for individuals that are victims of the above crimes. There are many questions that have been established in regards to why countries, South East Asia in particular have not become part of the ICC. The author, Valeriane Toon, presents to her readers some questions as to why Southeast Asia has not accepted the International Criminal Court. “Is it the fear of setting a precedent by consenting to the subjugation of territorial integrity on ethical grounds, which could culminate in a spontaneous compromise of state sovereignty once this, is ensconced into customary law, as articulated by numerous major powers? Or is it simply a rejection of terms propounded by the Statue” (Toon, 2004: 1)? The other main question that cannot be overlooked is how much influence does the United States may have over the governments of Southeast Asia” (Toon, 2004: 1)? Though Toon provides o...