Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Lester Pearson Peacekeeping Canada's role as a peacekeeper in the post-Cold War world assignment
Do Canadians have a heart for peacekeeping
Essay ansewring the questionof canada being a peacekeeping nation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Lester Pearson Peacekeeping Canada's role as a peacekeeper in the post-Cold War world assignment
Diplomacy leads to respect, which yields influence and ultimately power. Peacekeeping is a type of diplomacy. It falls under the category of preventive diplomacy, which is the act of preventing violent outbreaks and hostility with diplomatic solutions (United Nations, 2013). Peacekeeping is traditionally tied to Canadian culture; it is up there with the great beaver and maple syrup. It is a fine tradition with a noble history, and over the years, it has become one of Canada's most defining acts. Furthermore, peacekeeping gives Canadians a sense of unity while improving its international reputation. Unfortunately, Canadian peacekeeping efforts have lagged in the recent years, which is something that Canada should take up again. Canada should develop a more active role in peacekeeping because it gives Canada influence on a world stage.
Canada's peacekeeping efforts have cemented its reputation as a diplomatic nation, which all starts with its noble origin. Lester B. Pearson is often credited with pioneering peacekeeping within Canada. Fifty-seven years ago, during the Suez crisis in the Middle East, he suggested to the United Nations that a troop be sent over to supervise the tense situation. He addressed the United Nations by saying "We need action not only to end the fighting, but to make peace." This shows that Canada is a nation worth listening to, a nation worth negotiating with. Pearson's quote calls for a long term solution, not a short term one. Ending the fighting would be temporary, but creating peace would create a stable environment, where violence is less likely to erupt.Of course, not all of Canada's peacekeeping efforts have been successful. In 1994, Canadian troops were unable to prevent the death of 800, 000 Rw...
... middle of paper ...
... support, so it can help unite the country. Despite all these benefits, Canadian contributions to UN peacekeeping missions have halted as of late, which contributes to its waning global reputation.Peacekeeping has the ability to place Canada on a pedestalin the eyes of the world, because it is a project that is supported by many influential nations such as the United States (U.S. Department of State, 2010) and Australia (Australian War Memorial, 2011). Peacekeeping is too strongly rooted in Canadian history for it to completely disappear. Canada’s declining global reputation should be interpreted as a sign to respond to the call of arms. Peacekeeping represents all the things Canada traditionally represents; fairness, equity, acceptance and human rights. It is the perfect way to symbolize to the world at large that Canada is a diplomatic nation, worth listening to.
Canadians strongly believe that peacekeeping is about trying to protect people from extreme harm, a way of providing hope in situations that seem hopeless, and a good method of bringing peace and justice to war-torn countries or failed states. Canadians backing soldiers in their peacekeeping role has been so strong for such a long time that it has generated into their national identity. “Canadians cling to the mythology, born of the 1956 Suez Crisis, that we are a nation of peacekeepers, interposing between belligerent forces bent on war but, even though Canadian government officials and media of the 1990s called the operations in Bosnia and Somalia “peacekeeping missions,” they were something very different from Cold War-era peacekeeping.” Accordingly, over the past several decades, Canadian peacekeeping operations involving their military forces has shifted from a Pearson perspective based on humanitarian intervention to peacekeeping missions entailing massive violence. Therefore, my research paper will focus on how peacekeeping in the Canadian context has changed over the past several decades owing to the Canadian use of its military (internationally) force for extreme violence during peacekeeping missions. I wish to discuss this topic extensively within my research paper by focusing on vivid examples from UN Peacekeeping missions.
... nation. In addition to, supporting their allies, this shows how Canada is committed to maintain good alliances with their allies. They also joined a peacekeeping military defense with United States in order to gain trust from United States and become a peacekeeping military defense Canada is recognized today.
Eleven years after the second world war, a crisis occurred which had the potential to escalate into a third world war. Hostilities ran high and the background causes that prompted this crisis contained the same fundamentals as were seen in the first and second world wars. Those being militarism, alliances, imperialism and nationalism; wrought by those countries that had an interest in the Suez Canal and the Arab states. In the world of superpowers in conflict, Canada made a name for itself through an innovative peacekeeping scheme, instead of aggression (Encyclopedia Britannica Online, 1999-2000). If Canada had not become involved in the Suez Crisis, as a neutral party, it could have escalated into a world war. The three components which add up to the conclusion of the Suez Crisis and a bench mark for Canada and world peacekeeping are: Canada's choice for those countries directly involved in the crisis, Canada's choice for involvement, and Canada's resolution of the United Nations Emergency Force, which would put a stop to a possible world war.
Canada refused to participate in the Suez canal crisis, “this action was a symbolic gesture that showed both England and the World that Canada was now a fully autonomous nation in total control of its foreign policy” (http://mrmillerss11.blogspot.ca/2010/02/feb-24-canadas-autonomy-timeline.html) . To stop any violence that would soon abrupt Lester. B.Pearson came up with the idea of “peacekeeping”. He stated “We are now emerging into an age when different civilizations will have to learn to live side by side in peaceful interchange, learning from each other, studying each other’s history and ideals, art and culture, mutually enriching each other’s lives. »
In the book entitled Canada, NATO and The Bomb: The Western Alliance in Crisis by Tom Keating and Larry Pratt the main issue discussed was Canada’s position in Europe, North America and their view on the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. It went into specific issues dealing with political tension within Canada and tension outside Canada with other countries. It went through the years of different political parties and how they dealt with the matters of NATO.
Canada’s eligibility to participate on the world stage and its move towards independence was proven after the accomplishments at the Battle of Vimy Ridge. Foremost, Canada’s first opportunity to partake on the world stage came soon after the end of World War I, during the Paris Peace Conference. The accomplishments of the Canadian Army in the Battle of Vimy Ridge helped to earn Canada a spot in the Paris Peace Conference, after long arguments made on behalf of Canada by Prime Minister Robert Broden . The Prime Minister argued that Canada’s wartime record had earned Canada a seat separate from Britain. Canada was granted the seat despite the disapproval of the American President, Woodrow Wilson’s as they contributed greatly to the Allied forces especially in the Battle of Vimy Ridge. The approval of Canada’s seat is important to both the significance of the Battle of Vimy Ridge and the eligibility to participate on the world stage because it was one of the first steps Canada took towards its independence from Great Britain. Additionally, Canada became more social with other countries separate from Britain after the Battle of Vimy Ridge. Canada involved itself more in trading after the battle and the war, and had a flourishing...
...in reasons that most political violence occurs, and how to resolves these conflicts of political violence. After the research was completed, it is very apparent that Canada has had a very positive impact on Afghanistan. There are not many countries who would continue to stay in the country after completing their time in battle. Although Canada was involved in the war against Afghanistan, the country itself still found it mandatory for troops to continue to serve in Afghanistan as peace makers. Canada is known for peace and freedom and this exemplifies just that. Canada is putting forth time, effort, and money, to improve the living conditions of those in Afghanistan and helping them build a sustainable, peaceful life that they can carry out for years to come. Every country will have its own corruption; the answer is to begin from the basics. Peace and security.
The way we engage in future conflicts was changed as well. Canada would no longer get involved as a British colony or single country, but rather under the United Nations. We exhibited ourselves as leaders and role models. In the Korean War Canada asserts itself as a world power but under th...
Canada is known by outsiders to be a very peaceful country. But if you ask any Canadian, they will tell you that is unfortunately not the case. There is a large ongoing conflict between Canadians. The conflict is between the French and the English, or more specifically between Quebec and the rest of Canada. As a result of this conflict, along with some wrongdoing and propaganda.
...e Canada tend to not put others lives in perspective and to not think about what may or may not be happening to them. We are so fortunate to not be in a place where most people don’t starve to death and whole villages have to move because of bombing in their area or some other bad event to take place.
As I have already stated Canada is very well known for our many peacekeeping efforts. This is due to the many places our peacekeepers have been, or are at this very moment, such as Bosnia, East Timor and even Central Africa. These are just a very small portion of the places our peacekeepers are presently stationed. I am not even mentioning the dozens and dozens of other places they have been to. Our peacekeepers have helped save countless lives and Canada has gained relatively little in return, but Canada does it anyways, because it is the right thing to do.
First of all, Canada made a positive contribution to international conflicts through the battles they were apart of. One battle Canada was apart of is the
War unites nations and divides continents; it can form alliances and collapse mighty empires. In the past hundred years, wars have raged across larger battlefields than ever before. These large conflicts have contributed greatly to technological advancements and increased patriotism in the countries involved. Canada is no exception to this, and the wars she has been involved in have impacted her more than anything else over the past century. Over the past hundred years, war has instilled ideas of patriotism, independence and bravery in the Canadian identity. Canada fought fiercely for independence after World War I showed it could function without the assistance of Britain. When World War II broke out, Canada vaulted seriously onto the world
Canada has played a vital role in international relations for the majority of its 144 year history since the signing of Confederation in 1867. Canada first participated in World War I, then World War II in 1939-1945. Following World War II, Canada was also involved in the Korean War. Canada has been primarily a peacekeeping nation. There are many questions people ask when a high income country goes to help a lower income nation such as Afghanistan.
Canada's peacekeeping is not as significant in the world today. This will be debatable because some might differ and say that Canada is relevant in the world today with peacekeeping. The reader should care about this because we all live on the same planet and it affects all of us. We should be able to help each other out when it's needed regardless of cultural, religious, and territorial differences. We shouldn't let national interest and the interests of oligarchies and corporations create barriers amongst our international peers and make us choose sides but unfortunately that's how it is and Canada has derailed from the path where we helped people who were being oppressed no matter who they were or where they were.