Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of the Court of Justice of the EU within the EU legal system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
2. Other developments and steps to overcome the crisis
Reforms aside, the Committee of Ministers continuously acknowledged the need to improve the protection of human rights by the help of the ECtHR. Shortly after Protocol 14 the Committee of Ministers of the CoE recalled „its mission to take measures in order to guarantee the long-term effectiveness of the control system instituted by the Convention (Council of Europe 2004)“. In this section some of the steps taken as well as issues that remain problematic will be highlighted.
Let us start with a more general debate about both nature and purpose of the European human rights system: As the overload of applications still poses one of the main problems a mechanism was introduced in order to avoid the so far established case-by-case approach and instead let pilot judgments handle repetitive cases, thus conceiving of the Court as a constitutional court. In doing so the Court avoids the backlog of thousands of cases which can actually all be traced back to one and the same structural problem and instead singles out selected cases (Buyse 2009). The main objective is to reduce the Court’s workload, firstly by directly demanding resolution of all comparable cases in the respondent state and secondly indirectly as this will eventually lead to national reform (O’Boyle, 2011). What is more is that by concentrating on pilot judgments it supposedly can enunciate general principles of human rights law, arguing that it is the Courts main role to be a European standard setter, „constitutionalizing the human rights protection under its jurisdiction (Oppedal 2011: 94)“. Prof. Rick Lawson gets to the heart of the debate when he advocates for the constitutional court’ camp, claiming that „the Court...
... middle of paper ...
... Pilot Judgement Procedure addressing Systemic Human Rights Issues, University of Bergen, Department of Comparative Politics, Master Thesis
O’Boyle, Michael (2011) ‘The Future of the European Court of Human Rights’, German Law Journal, 12, 10, pp. 1862-1877.
Pavone, Tommaso (2012) The Past and Future Relationship of the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights: A Functional Analysis, University of Chicago
Rainey, Bernadette (2012) Human Rights Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, ch. 2, pp. 20-37.
Sepúlveda, M. et al (2004) Human Rights Reference Handbook, Costa Rica, University of Peace, part II, Ch. 2 ‘The Council of Europe’, pp. 125-144.
Stone Sweet, Alec and Helen Keller (2008) ‘Assessing the Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems’. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 33. Accessed under: http://works.bepress.com/alec_stone_sweet/32
How much more do we need to do before we start responding to these legacies? Works Cited United Human Rights Council. United Human Rights Council. N.p., n.d. Web. The Web.
MICHAELSEN, C., THE RENAISSANCE OF NON-REFOULEMENT? THE OTHMAN (ABU QATADA) DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. .
Simmonds C., ‘Paramountcy and the ECHR: a conflict resolved? [2012] Cambridge Law Journal Vol. 71 Issue 3, 498-201
The case of Francovich had a significant impact on the European Union (EU) law. If a conflict arises between the EU law and the national law, the EU law highly prevails. The European Union law is a framework of treaties and legislation, which have a direct or indirect effect on the laws of the member states which are bound to the European Union. Primary and Secondary laws are the two sources of the EU law. This essay will firstly analyse the main institutions of the European Union and define various legal terms. It will then move on, to discuss the case of Francovich and the importance it had for state liability. Furthermore, it will refer to subsequent cases which are linked with state liability and had an impact on the EU Law. Lastly, my own views about State Liability will be presented.
Schattuck, John. “Overview of Human Right Practices, 1995,” Country Reports on Human Rights Practices. March 1996: n.p. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 10 Oct 2013.
...2009): 8-9. United Nations Human Rights Council Universal Periodic Review. Web. 8 Apr. 2014. .
Prof. Jeffrey A. Brauch, The Margin of Appreciation and the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: Threat to the rule of law, Vol.11, Columbia Journal of European Law (2004-2005)
The current century has witnessed immense improvement and re-conceptualization of standards and sovereignty of human rights in Latin America. With the endemic repression and violations of human rights throughout Latin American in the mid to late 20th century, the International human rights regime, an amalgam of international and intergovernmental organizations and bodies, expanded exponentially. By conducting investigations within certain countries, or simply monitoring overt violations of human rights, the international human rights regime stimulated global awareness of violations of human rights in different countries; soon to follow was change in domestic policy in response to international policy. This also led to increased opposition by domestic NGOs against repressive governments or dictatorships largely responsible for human rights violations. Just as well, a number of organizations and groups aided domestic non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in their growing efforts to establish judicial practices that better protected human rights. Declarations, conventions, and charters, established a number of values that served as the credo for the organizations that constituted the international human rights regime. Over time, more and more countries were pressured and held accountable for these values, which developed into universal standards for human rights practices. Thus the International Human right regime and the pressure they imposed upon governments ultimately resulted in widespread positive changes in human rights.
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (European Convention on Human Rights, as amended) (ECHR), Art 5(1)(e)
45 Oona Hathaway, ‘Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?’ (2003) 112 Yale Law Journal
The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights is a document which brings together all of the Fundamental Human Rights together in one, single document. Before the inception of EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, the member states of the European Union had many conflicting opinions on what exactly a human right entailed, therefore the need for a single, codified document outlaying the basic Fundamental Human Rights was great. The Charter was issued in 2000 and at this time, according to Jesse Norman, The Parliamentary Undersecretary of State for Industry and Energy, ‘The charter was then described as a ‘solemn proclamation’ and was designed to strengthen the EU’S political legitimacy, containing rights and freedoms as well as strengthening the rights of
...., Raič, and Thuránszky J., The International Court of Justice: its future role after fifty
The universality of human rights is a concept. This impression embraces that human rights belong to all human beings and are essential to each type of society. By this, “Each individual has the same basic human rights. Individuals may exercise miscellaneous rights, or exercise the same rights differently; on the environment of the society or group. An assorted group consists of certain races, ethnicity, religion, children or women. ” (Article 22 United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights) As time progress the content of human rights changes over time however, the concept of their universali...
113-117 Human Rights: Politics and Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.