Can You Keep A Secret Lucinda Rosenfeld Summary

971 Words2 Pages

Critical Conversation Lucinda Rosenfeld wrote a book review for the New York Times titled, Can You Keep A Secret. Rosenfeld pointed out many elements of the book she felt made the book a good read. However, She did have one criticism. Rosenfeld said, “If I have one real criticism, it’s that the sociological profile of Georges’ family doesn’t quite feel true to life” (Rosenfeld). In other words, Rosenfeld didn’t believe Georges is a realistic family. A book review posted on, theresabook.com, disagrees Rosenfelds’ criticism. This review pointed out that the characters, setting, and other elements seemed realistic. One of the quotes they made was, “What makes Stead’s writing so phenomenal isn’t a ground breaking new setting or bizarre other-wordly …show more content…

These parents tend to be lenient while trying to avoid confrontation. The benefit of this parenting style is that they are usually very nurturing and loving,” according to Mgbemere and Tells (Mgbemere). In other words, children of permissive parents are loved and have few to no rules to follow. Mgbemere and Tells say permissive parents lack of rules and structure can be bad for children. They said, “It may seem as though this would be a child’s favorite parenting style as it provides a sense of freedom without consequences, however, children crave a sense of structure to make them feel safe” (Mgbemere). In other words, in order for children to feel safe, a solid structure is need. Other negatives include, lack of social skills, self-centeredness, and disagreements with authority. To sum it up, while permissive parents show affection, the large amount of freedom given to the child can have negative …show more content…

The article exams two types of lies, Prosocial, and antisocial. The article defines prosocial lies as, “Prosocial lies are motivated by the desire to make others feel good or to spare the feelings of the recipient and foster amicable social relationships” (Crossman, 2). The article characterizes antisocial lies as lies, “told solely for personal benefit” (Crossman, 2). In other words, prosocial lies are meant to benefit the person telling the lie and another person in order to create a stronger relationship. These lies are told to be polite, to make others feel better, and numerous other things that are meant to benefit people other than the person telling the lie. Antisocial lies do not benefit anyone other than the person telling the lie. An example of this would be to lie in order to not get into trouble. Of the two types of lies, prosocial, “lies are rated less negatively and considered more socially acceptable” (Crossman, 2). One of the reasons prosocial lies are more acceptable are because of moral evaluations for the lies. The study found “adolescents (12–17 years of age) and college students were less likely to identify false statements told to protect another (i.e., prosocial lies) as lies than statements intended to harm another (i.e., antisocial lies). Thus, in contrast to

Open Document