Can Nuclear Waste Be Disposed Of Safely?

2122 Words5 Pages

Can Nuclear Waste Be Disposed of Safely?

The disposal of nuclear waste is a grave and meaningful issue regarding technology and science in this day and age. This matter is not new to us though. The use of nuclear energy is one of the most important discoveries and has been in play for amelioration on technological footing. The breakthrough occurred in 1970’s and nuclear energy was found to be a plausible source of power. But during the past two decades it has become a ponderous discussion whether the use of nuclear energy is safe or not. It has always been a matter of great controversy whether we would ever be able to get rid of the nuclear waste that is the byproduct of the use of nuclear energy that is imperative in our advancement in science. But the truth is that without its use, the energy required to power the worldwide populace would fall far short.

So, it is a necessity that we use it, but the methods for safe disposal should also be explicit. Currently coal, gas and hydro are the major sources of energy. But as mentioned beforehand these resources would become scarce in the future. Nuclear power was devised so that we could gain far more energy from radioactive elements as compared to the aforementioned sources. The energy is produced by the use of nuclear reactors, the fuel used in these reactors is the source of the wastes. The waste is basically used up radioactive elements that were part of the fuel. These elements are extremely toxic in nature and must be disposed of with utmost care. But, the matter of contention is that whether it can be disposed of safely or not. The research and studies represent varying conclusions that may need to be further discussed. The sources used for this essay are

1. Peer Review of th...

... middle of paper ...

...ng about disasters. Because, there are always unforeseen circumstances that can actually topple the safety measures and the repercussions are too heavy to bear. If energy source depletion is a dilemma then so is nuclear disaster. They are unavoidable, even if they do not occur at a massive scale, they almost always take live by causing cancer through there harmful radiations. The potential exposure, mainly for workers, is too much. And they are usually the ones who have to bear the brunt of these disasters. Deaths are not uncommon in these cases, and unemployed take this chance at the expense of their lives. So, no one should be sacrificing anything just yet. Rather new methods should be employed for energy production and testing should continue for nuclear energy resources but under carefully controlled environment. This seems to be the only solution in sight for me.

Open Document