Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Prophecy throughout the old and new testament
Analysis of julius caesar the gallic war
Prophecy throughout the old and new testament
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Prophecy throughout the old and new testament
Did you know that Caesar's Gallic War only has 9-10 good manuscripts written 900 years after his time? Did you know that the History of Thucydides and the History of Herodotus have only eight manuscripts each, and were originally written in 460-400 BC. When dated, those eight manuscripts were found to be from AD 900. That’s 1, 300 years after the authors’ times! These documents’ historical accuracy are not questioned at all. However, this essay is about a different book, one that has been criticized from the beginning and is still criticized today though many facts prove its true worth. The Bible has around 6,000 Greek New Testament complete or fragmented manuscripts, not to mention the Latin ones and the ones from other languages. The oldest one …show more content…
That is only 30 years after the apostle’s death! The Bible is a historically accurate book because biblical prophecies have been proven true from the Bible and other sources, there are many archaeological finds of ancient civilizations, peoples and events mentioned in the Bible, and the texts have not changed over time. According to Dr Stefan Drüeke, the co curator of the Bibel Museum Wuppertal, Germany, there have been more than 300 Bible prophecies proven to be correct. These prophecies were written about events up to 1000 years in the future from the time they were written. There are three prophecies that will be mentioned in this essay as evidence to this point. The first prophecy… rather group of prophecies are the messianic prophecies of the Old Testament. These are any prophecies related to the messiah (Hebrew word)/ Christ (Greek word) whom we now know to be (according to the Bible) Jesus Christ. There are many specific prophecies about Him; where he was to be born/his family (for example Genesis 49:10), and how his death would be (for instance Isaiah 53). Though there are only two messianic prophecies mentioned in this article, there are at least 31 fulfilled
The Bible: The Old Testament. The Norton Anthology of World Masterpieces. Ed. Sarah Lawall et al. Vol 1. 7th ed. New York: Norton, 1999. 47-97.
What was Julius Caesar’s motive for launching the Gallic Wars? Multiple arguments can be made to better understand his intensions. The first argument is that Caesar was responding to aggression in order to preserve the sovereignty of Rome. The second more likely explanation is that Caesar took over the Gaul to improve his political strength within the Roman republic and did so by exploiting the Celts. Caesar’s war commentaries, show evidence of his conflicting motives and actions to his invasion of the Gallic regions. Although there is some credibility to seek security, it is clear that the Gallic people did not present a significant threat to Rome, and is evident in Caesar’s campaigns in the Gaul and the opposition he faced.
In conclusion this paper has showed many different reason how he has changed life and how he changed people's lives in history forever.
Gaius Julius Caesar, born 100 B.C.E. in Rome to the impoverished patrician Julian Clan, knew controversy at an early age. Nephew to Populare Gaius Marius, he was earmarked by the Optimate dictator Sulla for prosciption after his refusal to divorce his Populare wife, Cinna. Fleeing Rome, and not returning until after Sulla’s resignation in 78 B.C.E, upon his return he gained a position as a pontificate, an important Roman priesthood. Slowly but surely throughout his lifetime he worked his way up the political ladder, eventually becoming Consul, and finally Dictator Perpeteus – Dictator for life. One of the most influential political and military leaders of all time, Caesar was also a highly intelligent man and an exceptional orator. However, acquiring this absolute power was no mean feat, and Caesar had well equipped himself through previous expeditions with all the resources necessary to gain power in Ancient Rome.
Writings of historical scholars, Josephus, Aristotle, and Plato, to name a few, are taken as truth and fact, yet the writings of the Scripture are constantly disputed. Why? Perhaps because of the ethical imperatives imposed to which people do not want to adhere. Perhaps because of man’s ego and pride that disallows them to submit to a Higher Authority. Nonetheless, The Bible has been, and still remains, the most widely read and revered book of all
Julius Caesar was a general and a politician of the late Roman Republic. He greatly influenced the size of the Roman Empire before seizing power and making himself dictator of Rome, which paved the way for the Imperial system. (Julius Caesar 100BC-44BC, April 29th, 2014)
The discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls has been hailed by people of many religious and cultural backgrounds as the greatest discovery of manuscripts to be made available to modern scholars in our time and has dramatically altered our understanding of the origins of Christianity. Perhaps the most fundamental reexamination brought about by the Scrolls is that of the Gospel of John. The Fourth Gospel originally accepted as a product of second century Hellenistic composition is now widely accepted as a later first century Jewish writing that may even contain some of the oldest traditions of the Gospels . The discovery of the scrolls has led to the discussion of undeniable and distinct parallels between the ideas of the society at Qumran and those present in the Gospel of John.
Julius Caesar was born on July 12, 100 BC in Rome. He was a Roman general
Julius Caesar was a good leader for the Roman Empire. For starters, "Julius Caesar was a general, a statesman, a lawgiver, an orator, and a historian." (N.S. Gill). He was very powerful and established a popularity among the people of Rome. He reduced slavery, gave more land to people like peasants and soldiers, established roman colonies, and also established tax reforms. Leading him and his soldiers to many victories concluded with him never losing a war. He took over Germany and invaded Britain. (source: softschools Julius Caesar timeline). He made the people of Rome very happy, filled them with hope, and rose to power very quickly. (Sources/authors: mainly by N.S. Gill, softschools, and Ellis and Esler).
Scholars have shifted from the notion that the Bible differs from other ancient Near Eastern literature, cultures, and religions. If this were so, the Bible would be considered a myth. In this chapter Oswalt gives descriptions to what a myth is and gives insight into whether it is acceptable to label the Bible as a myth. Since the 1960s, scholars have been stating that the attributes of the Bible and its contemporary belief system have more in common to a myth even though the data used to make these claims have remained the same.
For centuries now Christians have claimed to possess the special revelation of an omnipotent, loving Deity who is sovereign over all of His creation. This special revelation is in written form and is what has come to be known as The Bible which consists of two books. The first book is the Hebrew Scriptures, written by prophets in a time that was before Christ, and the second book is the New Testament, which was written by Apostles and disciples of the risen Lord after His ascension. It is well documented that Christians in the context of the early first century were used to viewing a set of writings as being not only authoritative, but divinely inspired. The fact that there were certain books out in the public that were written by followers of Jesus and recognized as being just as authoritative as the Hebrew Scriptures was never under debate. The disagreement between some groups of Christians and Gnostics centered on which exact group of books were divinely inspired and which were not. The debate also took place over the way we can know for sure what God would have us include in a book of divinely inspired writings. This ultimately led to the formation of the Biblical canon in the next centuries. Some may ask, “Isn’t Jesus really the only thing that we can and should call God’s Word?” and “Isn’t the Bible just a man made collection of writings all centered on the same thing, Jesus Christ?” This paper summarizes some of the evidences for the Old and New Testament canon’s accuracy in choosing God breathed, authoritative writings and then reflects on the wide ranging
These three tests when applied to the Bible show it as the most historically reliable text known to man, thus the events found upon the pages of the Bible are actual historically proven events. In light of these facts, there are still many theories other than that of the Biblical account. Three of them include the "Visionary" theory, the theft theory, and the wrong tomb theory. The first theory is that of Strauss, that the appearances of Jesus after His death on the cross were "visions generated by the imaginations of the disciples (Ramsey 48)." This may be the easiest of all the theories to discredit. First of all, it does not take into account the inability of the disciples to grasp this idea that Christ was alive and to recognize Him for who He was (Ramsey 48).
In this paper, there will be a discussion about the canonization of the New Testament. Along with an investigation into who was involved in this process. The people and institutions looked at will include the following: Marcion, Irenaeus, Origen, Synod of Hippo, and God. First, let us look at the canonization of the New Testament. The first available list of the New Testament books is called the Muratorian Canon and it dates somewhere around A.D. 150.
Thiselton, A.C. (2005). Can the Bible mean whatever we want it to mean? Chester, U.K.: Chester Acadamic Press, 10-11.
For many years, I have had this ideology that all the information inscribed in the Bible is factual. It was thought provoking to see that the Bible is composed of historically accurate information and stories. The Introduction to the Bible course has given me the opportunity to explore and broaden my perspective on the Catholic bible. I am challenging myself to see the bible from a historical and scientific view, but also with a view of my faith. The information that I have gathered from the course has caused me to question faith and facts.