More handpicked essays just for you.
Using pathos, logos or ethos in rhetorical analysis
Using pathos, logos or ethos in rhetorical analysis
Using pathos, logos or ethos in rhetorical analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Caesar Chavez in Class Essay
Although most people would find violence a necessity to gaining what they want, Caesar Chavez recognizes the benefits of nonviolent resistance. Violence is the instinctive reaction people have to a variety of situations. This was often the case with opposing views people had during the Civil Rights Era. In a magazine of religious organization the author Chavez emphasizes how nonviolent resistance will earn them equal rights with little to no bloodshed through the use of several rhetorical devices.
One such way Chavez counters the need for violence is by using ethos and pathos. By starting off with talking about the legend of Dr. King Chavez establishes himself as an expert on Civil Rights and how nonviolence is the course of action that people need to take. This creates the credibility, or ethos needed for Chavez to
…show more content…
Chavez couples the ethos with pathos, one such way he uses pathos is to make his audience recall what violence generates. Violence leads to blood and death and Chavez makes this clear by stating “However important the struggle is and however much misery, poverty, and exploitation exist, we know that it cannot be more important than one human life.” Not only does this statement help people understand that violence leads to death, it also speaks of the value of a single life. Chavez never points out which side the death would be on due to the fact the loss life can be on either side. This makes people stop and think because nothing is worse than the death of a family, friend or even a neighbor. This encourages the audience not to fight with violence. Reminding people of the negative emotion caused by loss that they could experience will make them reconsider the use of violence rather than
Utilizing paradox, Chavez describes the effectiveness of nonviolent protest to his audience. Recalling the achievements of MLK, Chavez claims that King “learned how to successfully fight hatred and violence with the unstoppable power of nonviolence.” This quote demonstrates
The political climate in the United States has recently been very intense, all beginning with Trump and his negative remarks against the immigrant community. His most famous and derogatory words calling Mexicans rapists and drug dealers (Reilly), sparked a huge uproar in the defense of the Mexican people who have chosen to immigrate to the United States. Along his path to the presidency he has time after time belittled Mexicans and their culture. That, however, has not stopped the Mexican band, Calibre 50 from shedding light on an all too real journey and attempting to fortify their fans for a common cause. Almost a year into Trump’s presidency Calibre 50 released the music video for their song, “El Corrido de Juanito.” The music video follows the journey of a man crossing the border to which it then shows him trying to make a life for himself in the United States as a gardener and a chef. The video attempts to show what it is like to illegally
Cesar Chavez was an effective leader for many reasons, but mostly it was because he never gave up. Chavez was born on his grandfather’s farm during the Great Depression. When he was still young, his family lost their farm and became migrant workers meaning they had to move many times. Chavez attended 36 schools up until eighth grade when he dropped out of school to help his family out with the farming. While he worked in the farms, he was exposed to the hardships of farm life. Since then, Chavez decided that he did not want anyone else that was a farm worker to experience the same things he did. He wanted to follow in the steps of Martin Luther King Jr and Gandhi to protest in a nonviolent way.
Like many activist Cesar Chavez set many campaigns to get some type of social change, this was easy for him
Have you ever felt oppressed by others? If you were, wouldn’t you want to try and make a change? Some civil activists use effective strategies that could potentially help you. Martin Luther King Jr., Cesar Chavez, and Malala Yousafzai all used ethos, pathos, and logos in their speeches “I Had a Dream,” “The Commonwealth Address,” and the “UN address” respectively. All 3 wished to achieve a good change for a people or for a bigger population, but through it all they had to face opposition. To push through, they made powerful speeches to assure their supporters that they were on the right side and that the authority was wrong. All 3 of these activists use ethos, pathos, and logos to question authority effectively by supporting their claims, connecting
In Chavez's argument, he explained the importance of nonviolence during the Civil Rights Movement. He used Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s movement as an example of successful protest using nonviolence. Although Dr. King's example proved to be effective, after he died, several members of the movement resorted to violence which caused the death of thousands of Americans. Chavez argued nonviolence is the only way to protest violence in order to attract support for his cause: the farm workers' movement. Chavez's rhetorical choices, through his tone and allusion to history, effectively influenced farmers to protest without violence.
"Martin Luther King: The Philosophy of Nonviolent Resistance." Suite101.com: Online Magazine and Writers' Network. Web. 16 Nov. 2010. .
Despite the belief that fighting with violence is effective, civil disobedience has been tried throughout history and been successful. Fighting violence with violence leaves no oppertunity for peace to work. By refusing to fight back violently, Martin Luther King Jr. took a race of people, taught them the value of their voice, and they earned the right to vote. Henry David Thoreau presented his doctrine that no man should cooperate with laws that are unjust, but, he must be willing to accept the punishment society sets for breaking those laws, and hundreds of years later, people are still inspired by his words. Mohandas K. Gandhi lead an entire country to its freedom, using only his morals and faith to guide him, as well as those who followed him, proving that one man can make a difference. Civil disobedience is the single tool that any person can use to fight for what they want, and they will be heard. After centuries of questioning it, it appears that the pen truly is mightier than the sword.
Nonviolence is not only a peaceful action but it clears the view of the person, making their goal more reachable. Cesar claimed that “nonviolence is more powerful than violence.” Cesar uses the concept of America’s “conscience” and their “yearning for justice.” He uses the argument of injustice throughout history. He says, “Who
Cesar Chavez in an excerpt from an article published in the magazine of a religious organization asserted that nonviolence is a more effective method of resistance than violence. Chavez supports his assertion by introducing a poignant juxtaposition of violence and peaceful methods, then he employs an effectual allusion to a past peaceful civil rights leader, and finally he presents a compelling logical appeal to the audience about the consequences of violent retaliation. The author’s purpose is to persuade the audience to protest injustice through peaceful methods in order to avoid physical harm and gain public support. The author utilizes an urgent tone for all of society, specifically members of the farm worker’s movement.
Logically this argument is appealing because most people have a strong sense of right and wrong. Chavez asserts that nonviolence is that only way of gathering support for a cause because violence can cause great pain as lives are lost, and is overall demoralizing. He then goes on to
Martin Luther King Jr. once said “nothing good ever comes from violence”. He was a leader who ran many protests for civil rights. Being non violent in his protests was very emphasized by Martin Luther King. In the play Romeo and Juliet written by William Shakespeare there are perfect examples shown as of why Martin Luther king was right.
"There are many causes that I am prepared to die for, but no causes that I am prepared to kill for," is something that Mahatma Gandhi said. It tells the truth about peaceful protests. By choosing the peaceful way, people do sit-ins and marches, instead of harsher actions like riots. Although breaking the law to create change can appear to work without being peaceful, it will have an easier time getting public and government approval if the activists are not causing serious harm. If the peaceful way wasn’t’ available, people would see change in a harsher way, so peaceful resistance has a positive effect in a free society.
It was Malcolm X who said, “By any means necessary” when discussing the measures that needed to be enacted in order to bring change. However, determining which means are effective in bringing about change is crucial to the success of a movement. The evident reality is that peaceful acts of civil resistance have overall been much more successful than those that have been fueled by violence. A 2-year study conducted by political scientist, Erica Chenoweth, reveals just that. The study showed that:
Maria E. & Chenoweth, T. (2012). Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict. Columbia University Press