Cadillac Desert By Marc Reisner Summary

1431 Words3 Pages

Marc Reisner in Cadillac Desert, explores and argues with the controversies in the mid-1800s about dam development on the 20-inch isohyet, which splits Western and Eastern America where rainfall is below or above 20 inches of rain. “To easterners, “conservation” of water usually means protecting rivers from development; in the West, it means building dams'' (Resiner, 12). His research primarily focuses on Western America, along with the scarcity of water resources that inevitably led to the result of over-reliance on dam projects, including the start of the shape of history. “A place where one couldn't even secure a horse was no place to try to anchor a civilization” (Resiner, 436). Stating that even if there was some development in the West, …show more content…

What right did we have, in the span of his lifetime, to dam nearly all the world's rivers?” (Reisner, 308). Those who wanted dams were practically destroying the only water sources they were able to keep hold of at the time, dams are good for some benefits, but too many dams will inevitably lead towards the decline of the environment. Carter, just like John Wesley Powell and David Brower, also cared for environmentalism at least enough to understand the dire situations and consequences of damming. “...the site had geological problems was apparent from the very beginning, but the Bureau, as it would in several cases, built it anyway, for the simple reason that it was running out of good places to erect its dams” (Reisner, 379). Showing that the Bureau only truly cared about the popularity and attractions of dam development, they just built dams to build dams and created cash register dams to fund even more projects that weren't even needed. “Congress without water projects

Open Document