Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on the colonisation of mexico
Exploration in the new world
Essay on the colonisation of mexico
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on the colonisation of mexico
Colonization of the new world had may aspects behind it, including but not limited to the of exploring of new sectors of the world, to the expansion of empires, and the hopes of gaining wealth and higher social standings. These same principals of colonization are illustrated in both Castaways, Cabeza De Vaca’s personal narrative of his journey to the new world and Andres Resendez’s A Land So Strange an interpretation of Cabeza’s expedition. Both pieces of literature excellently demonstrate the hopes of people journeying to the new world and the shortcomings and tribulations the expeditioners did not anticipate or were prepared for. Within the two books Cabeza De Vaca and Panifilo Narvaez demonstrate this very struggle people faced. While it …show more content…
would be easy to say that the lack of knowledge the two had on the area led to their demise as it did play a part, a key if not the main component of why these Spaniards struggled so immensely in their quest of colonization is the conflict between these two-main protagonists in the novels. In both Cabeza’s and Resendez’s respective novels it clearly depicts the conflicts Cabeza and Narvaez endured, and the lack of leadership and wits Cabeza believed that Narvaez demonstrated throughout the voyage. Both novels explain the disagreements the two went through with Cabeza’s being a personal account to the King about the events of the expedition and Resendez’s being his own interpretation of Cabeza’s journey. Point being both texts explain how the selfishness, greed, and Narvaez’s unwillingness to listen to the counsel of Cabeza led to the eventual demise of Narvaez himself and the expedition. Narvaez’s actions led both Cabeza and Resendez to document the lack of leadership and contention that occurred during their exploration of the new world. To begin with Resendez’s text as it serves as the least biased between the two texts, Resendez’s interpretation of Cabeza’s and Narvaez’s relationship favors Cabeza.
From the start of Resendez’s novel it paints Narvaez with an aura of incompetence and arrogance. For example, before the novel reaches what was supposed to be the colonization of present day Florida, which was a problem within itself Resendez explains the trouble Narvaez faced while attempting to colonize Mexico. Narvaez was employed to colonize Mexico in place of Diego Velazquez who was a former conquistador because he was “… getting old, and his expanding waistline was already the butt of jokes.” while “Narvaez, by contrast was still in his thirties and looked every bit the part of the Spanish conquistador…” . Though Narvaez may have looked the part of a great colonist he did not play the part according to the accounts of Resendez as the events in Mexico Tenochtitlan depicted. Narvaez was sent to Mexico to “…apprehend Cortes and his soldiers, who were bad men with no license from the King of Spain...”, however the exact opposite happened. One night there was a storm and Narvaez “…had never believed that Cortes would dare to fight a force that was four times as large…” however that is exactly what happened and even after having the chance to prepare himself with news that “Cortes’s forces were about 3 miles from camp, the leader could not bring himself to take the threat seriously.” Narvaez did not take the …show more content…
threat seriously and was defeated and for years would end up “shackled and in chains” imprisoned by Cortes, ironically the same person he was supposed to bring back in chains. Resendez’s account of what happened in Mexico make it easy to understand why Resendez depicts Cabeza’s disgust with Narvaez’s leadership abilities. After being imprisoned for years by Cortes Narvaez’s wife was eventually able to buy his freedom and have him released to Cuba where they resided. One would think after Narvaez suffered such a devastating loss in Mexico he would retire from his career as a colonist. Unfortunately, that is not the case and Narvaez would set out for one last expedition, a decision based upon pride and seeking retribution from Cortes, unfortunately none of these goals would be accomplished on his final trip. Adding on to the failures of Narvaez’s attempt at colonizing Mexico the events leading up to Narvaez’s attempt at colonizing what was supposed to be Rio de Las Palmas further displays Resendez’s description of Narvaez as an inept leader. The first of many mistakes made by Narvaez was his inability to find “a pilot familiar with the coast of Florida” which lead them to land quite a distance away from where he had intended to settle with no idea of the terrain with very little supplies. Coupled with the mistakes Narvaez made on his way to Florida are the mistakes he made upon landing at his “destination”. Upon landing Narvaez thought it was best that they split the expedition in two with half proceeding on foot along the coast and the other half sailing on to the mouth of the river to meet the others. Despite the contest of Cabeza who thought it was best to stay with the ships till they found a reliable harbor and more resources as they were running low, Narvaez continued with his plan, a decision that proved to be costly. With hindsight being the friend of Cabeza it appears that Narvaez used poor judgement in what to do. From deciding to move inland, to deserting the rest of his troops some ways into the expedition, to his eventual death, Narvaez’s decision making seemed self-serving and ultimately wrong. These details provided by Resendez paint a clear picture on why Cabeza did not trust Narvaez as a leader, an account that Cabeza describes even more clearly in his own personal narrative. Cabeza’s account from Castaways combined with what we learned from Resendez’s book is the last piece that completes the contentious relationship between Cabeza De Vaca and Narvaez.
Though there may be some bias “Given what became of the expedition, it would have been very much in his interest to cast himself as the voice of reason in this decisive argument.” the events Cabeza recounts point to conflict between himself and Narvaez. The first of these events that displayed Cabeza’s lack of faith in Narvaez is also displayed in the text of A Land So Strange. It comes when the colonists first reach land after sailing for several months and Narvaez called for counsel among the leaders about the decision to move inland. This is first decision that Cabeza advises against stating “I replied that I thought we should by no means leave the ships…” instead of moving inland Cabeza wanted to find a safe harbor first, with hindsight being Cabeza’s friend his advice should have been taken. Instead Narvaez questioned Cabeza’s honor “I had stayed behind out of fear, and that my honor would be impugned; and that I preferred to risk my life rather than place my honor in that position” and led to the deaths of many. Furthermore, as the expedition aged on an conditions grew graver the decision making of Narvaez continued to deteriorate as well. At one point as they were sailing on three separate rafts towards land, as Narvaez believed it to be the best course of action the Narvaez refused to
aid the ship containing Cabeza despite his plead. Cabeza had asked for a line from Narvaez’s ship as he could not keep up as his ship contained the weak and sick while Narvaez’s contained the healthiest and strongest. Despite Cabeza’s rational cry for help Narvaez replied “… this is no time for some to give orders to others, that each must do what best to him to save his life…” with this Narvaez sailed off leaving Cabeza behind with the sick and very little supplies. It is easy to understand what Cabeza thought about Narvaez as a leader and person at this point as Narvaez essentially left Cabeza and his men for dead, something very uncharacteristic of a leader. Now the last and ironic display of Narvaez ineptitude comes at the expense of himself. After some time of not seeing the Christian men he embarked on this trip with Cabeza encounters Esquivel who told Cabeza the fate of Narvaez. Esquivel told Cabeza how the northern wind had taken Narvaez’s and a mate’s “…boat out to see without anyone seeing it go…” without any supplies or anchor because he refused to sleep inland, because he did not trust the Indian tribe they were with. This would be the last mistake Narvaez would live to make and serves as fitting end to his expedition with his poor leadership leading ultimately to his own death as it had for many others. All in all, though the circumstances faced by both Narvaez and Cabeza would have been difficult for anyone to manage, Narvaez’s decision making was viewed as subpar in the eyes of Resendez and Cabeza De Vaca. Narvaez’s poor leadership abilities led to the death of all but four who embarked on the voyage and is thus very clearly discussed in a very negative light in the two texts. Lucky for us Cabeza De Vaca could live and tell the tale of Narvaez grievances and hopefully help his own case as he faced many trials due to the debts acquired throughout voyages to come. Cabeza’s account of the expedition gives a clear understanding of the lack of trust he had in Narvaez and A Land So Strange from Resendez does a great job portraying this message as well. These two texts provided great insight for the struggles and dangers faced when exploring the New world.
Anais Nin once said that “we write to taste life twice: in the moment and in retrospection.” In his book, Seven Myths of Spanish Conquest, Matthew Restall tries to change our perception of the past in other to open our eyes to what life was really like during the colonial period. As Restall puts it, the main propose of the book is to “illustrate the degree to which the Conquest was a far more complex and protracted affair” (p.154) than what was supposed in the latters and chronicles left by the conquistadores. Each one of Restall’s chapters examines one of seven myths regarding the mystery behind the conquest. By doing so, Matthew Restall forces us to look back at the Spanish conquest and question
To begin with, it is imperative to understand the premise and dialog of the book. Walker divides Shaky Colonialism into eight chapters. These chapters detail the inhabitants’ perceptions, struggles, efforts, etc. through the eyes and ideas of Walker. He begins in Chapter One with the explanation of the main points that will be discussed within the book. Chapter Two discusses the people of Lima’s reasons as to why they b...
In the first section, Monroy describes the Indian and the Iberian cultures and illustrates the role each played during missionization, as the Indians adapted ?to the demands of Iberian imperialism.?(5) He stresses the differen...
In this section his initial thoughts show through. “But losers matter, especially in the history of early America.” Many different regions of early America are examined in their years of early conquest when native populations started their descent. The biggest theme throughout the section is the effect that conquistadors and explorers had on the native population in their search for gold and glory. The information that is given is not typical of what is learned of early America, but tries to really focus on the most important figures of the time and there voyages. For example, when talking about the Plains nations and there explorers, Coronado and De Soto a tattooed woman woman is brought up who had been captured by both explorers at different times and different places, but little is known about her. “Of the tattooed woman who witnessed the two greatest expeditions of conquest in North America, and became captive to both, nothing more is known.” This point captures the main idea of the theme and what many know of this time. Horwitz aims to point out the important facts, not just the well known
What would you do if you were stranded on an Island all by yourself with a few
“The Conquest of New Spain” is the first hand account of Bernal Diaz (translated by J.M. Cohen) who writes about his personal accounts of the conquest of Mexico by himself and other conquistadors beginning in 1517. Unlike other authors who wrote about their first hand accounts, Diaz offers a more positive outlook of the conquest and the conquistadors motives as they moved through mainland Mexico. The beginning chapters go into detail about the expeditions of some Spanish conquistadors such as Francisco Hernandez de Cordoba, Juan de Grijalva and Hernando Cotes. This book, though, focuses mainly on Diaz’s travels with Hernando Cortes. Bernal Diaz’s uses the idea of the “Just War Theory” as his argument for why the conquests were justifiable
This text was created to bring to light the hardship Natives went through during the Age of Exploration. The populous, who only hear rumors and short stories from all territories west of the Atlantic Ocean, cannot grasp the tough and difficult task that is at hand in the Americas. From these short blurbs of what is said about the west, they make inferences of what it is like, and how it is possible for another land mass to be unknown to many for so long. But for those who do know what is past the Atlantic, know that this Agenda of the King and Queen must be fulfilled and to do so would be to claim land for Spain for it to be settled upon. On top of that is to further collect the riches of the Americas to benefit Spain in the conquest of the Americas.
In 1492, Christopher Columbus was a self-made man who worked his way up to being the Captain of a merchant vessel. He gained the support of the Spanish monarchs, Ferdinand and Isabella, for an expedition to the Indies. With the support of the Spanish monarchy, he set off to find a new and faster trade route to the Indies. Upon the arrival of his first voyage, Columbus wrote a letter to Luis de Santangel, a “royal official and an early supporter of his venture,” in February 1493 (35). The epistle, letter, entitled “Letter to Luis de Santangel Regarding the First Voyage” was copied and then distributed in Spain before being translated and spread throughout Europe. The Letter is held in such regard with the people as it is considered the first printed description of the new world. Through his description of the nature of the islands, Columbus decided the future fate of the islands. His description of the vast beauty of the nature around him, declares both the economic and nationalistic motivations for colonizing the new world.
Milanich, Jerald T. and Susan Milbrath., ed. First Encounters: Spanish Exploration in the Caribbean and the United States1492-1570. Gainesville: U of Florida P, 1989.
Another way the author supports his thesis are his descriptions of the reactions made by the Europeans who arrived at the immense and powerful society that already existed in the Americas. A distinct example is portrayed when describing the Spaniards arrival in Tenochtitlan: “Tenochtitlan dazzled its invaders-it was bigger than Paris, Europe’s greatest metropolis. The Spaniards gawped like yokels at the wide streets, ornately carved buildings, and markets bright with goods from hundreds
Bartolomé de Las Casas begins by providing a vivid description of each land being invaded by the Europeans and the type of peopl...
Adventures In The Unknown Interior of America, a narrative by Cabeza De Vaca, contains many pieces of information that are applicable to present day society and the culture that has been created. The values of today’s moral code and the moral code of those who lived in the fifteen-hundreds, whether or not they knew Spain as their mother country or America to be the only country, have similar qualities. Not only has moral code contained similar values but it also contains comparable accommodation to different cultures living among one another.
Cortés came not to the New World to conquer by force, but by manipulation. Bernal Díaz del Castillo, in the "Conquest of New Spain," describes how Cortés and his soldiers manipulated the Aztec people and their king Montezuma from the time they traveled from Iztapalaopa to the time when Montezuma took Cortés to the top of the great Cue and showed him the whole of Mexico and its countryside, and the three causeways which led into Mexico. Castillo's purpose for recording the mission was to keep an account of the wealth of Montezuma and Mexico, the traditions, and the economic potential that could benefit Cortés' upcoming conquest. However, through these recordings, we are able to see and understand Cortés' strategy in making Mexico "New Spain." He came as a wolf in a sheep's clothing and manipulated Montezuma through his apparent innocence.
In 1492, Columbus sailed the ocean blue. However, even after centuries later, little is truly known of the mysterious voyage and findings of the new world.1 By examining “Letter from Columbus to Luis Santangel”, one can further contextualize the events of Columbus' exploration of the New World. The letter uncovers Columbus' subtle hints of his true intentions and exposes his exaggerated tone that catered to his lavish demands with Spain. Likewise, The Columbian Voyage Map read in accordance with the letter helps the reader track Columbus' first, second, third, and fourth voyage to the New World carefully and conveniently. Thus, the letter and map's rarity and description render invaluable insight into Columbus' intentionality of the New World and its indigenous inhabitants.
From Spain's early arrival in the Caribbean through their establishment of the Spanish empire indigenous people were exploited through cheap, slave like labor. One of the most incredible subjects raised by the documents presented in Colonial Spanish America is the topic of Labor Systems that were imposed on the indigenous people. Spain tried to excuse this exploitation by claiming to save these indigenous people by teaching them the ways of Christ but many of the Articles in Colonial Spanish America, Struggle & Survival, and The Limits of Racial Domination prove otherwise. Through letters, personal stories, and other documents these books present accounts that tell about the labor system used in this area. They tell of the Spanish labor systems such as the encomiendos and later rapartamientos and how these operations were run.