Bystander Apathy

975 Words2 Pages

Bystander Apathy in Social Media In the early morning of March 13, 1964, Kitty Genovese was on her way home from work when she was brutally attacked and stabbed to death. Despite her desperate cries for help, no one intervened, raising questions about why none of the witnesses took action. The Witnesses, directed by James D. Solomon, takes Kitty’s absurd incident into a documentary that uncovers the truths of her death and the concept of the bystander effect. The bystander effect, otherwise known as bystander apathy, refers to the idea that individuals are less likely to help victims when there is a larger presence of people around. Assuming that someone else would assist the victim, bystanders often don't consider intervening themselves, resulting …show more content…

The consequences of numerous social media users assuming others have or will report the video have led the AI-generated video of Mr. Beast on TikTok to reach over 7,000 views on a fake verified account (MrBeast). This example underscores the role social media plays in the bystander effect. Despite the acknowledgment of the false claims offered in the post, many would be reluctant to report the post. Rather, they would assume that no one would be deceived by the claim or believe someone has already done so and not come forth with reporting it. This behavior allows the video to continue to be shared among other people, some of whom may believe the claims were true. Disregarding one simple action can lead to someone losing their personal information. To sum up, social media harms individuals when it comes to the bystander effect because of the reluctance to click “report abuse.” All in all, social media has become an area for bystander apathy due to the absence of physical presence and the hesitation to report others. This point is significant because it highlights the true nature that social media can play in terms of the bystander

Open Document