Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Non celebrities affected by paparazzi
Freedom of speech amendment
Freedom of speech amendment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Non celebrities affected by paparazzi
The American paparazzi have been described by celebrities and the news media as scum-of-the-Earth—mean, intrusive scavengers who feast upon other people’s misery (Saltzman par. 4). Imagine taking a walk with your children in a secluded hiking trail. You are trying to enjoy the peace and serenity that the beautiful day brings, but, as fate has it, you are a celebrity. Along with your fame come fans constantly asking for your autograph, people gazing and staring at you, and ultimately causing a scene wherever you go. However, today you found some time alone to enjoy a few moments of solitude or so you thought. Far off in the distance, you see a determined photographer ready to complete his quest of getting some shots that will turn a nice profit for him. As you rush to the car, you tell your kids to hurry. The seconds get shorter and the photographer closes in on his victim: you. His camera flashes in your face. The flickering lights hurt your children’s eyes. The photographers, or more appropriately, the paparazzi were just taking pictures in a public place so were they really breaking any laws? [Add Halley Berry] It has been proven that paparazzi tactics of hunting icons have led to trespassing, behavior constituting assault, and invasion of their targeted celebrity’s privacy (McNamura The paparazzi have gotten out of hand, and their antagonistic behavior, intended or not, should be restricted.
The paparazzi’s first line of defense is not an unfamiliar one in this democratic country of ours. Their battle cry is freedom of the press or freedom of speech (Alach 208). They claim that we as a people have a "right to know."(CITE) The first amendment to the Bill of Rights clearly states, “congress shall make no law prohibiting […] or a...
... middle of paper ...
...azzi Issue." Quill. 86.5 (1998): 42. MasterFILE Premier. Web. 14 Mar. 2014.
Nordhaus, Jamie E. "Celebrities' Rights To Privacy: How Far Should The Paparazzi Be Allowed To Go?" Review Of Litigation. 18.2 (1999): 286-314. Academic Search Premier. Web. 15 Mar. 2014.
The Paparazzi Reform Initiative. “Legal.” N.p. N.d. Web. 14 Feb. 2014.
Saltzman, Joe. "Paparazzi To Go." USA Today Magazine. 138.2774 (2009): 25. Academic Search Premier. Web. 14 Mar. 2014.
Saner, Emine. "Have Celebrities Finally Snapped?" The Guardian. Guardian News and Media, 04 May 2009. Web. 14 Mar. 2014.
Willis, Keith D. "Paparazzi, Tabloids, And The New Hollywood Press: Can Celebrities Claim A Defensible Publicity Right In Order To Prevent The Media From Following Their Every Move?" Texas Review Of Entertainment & Sports Law. 9.1 (2007): 175-202. Academic Search Premier. Web. 14 Mar. 2014.
The Wasp Women tells the story of Janice Starlin, owner and CEO of a cosmetics company. To bolster her declining sales she enlists the help of recently fired beekeeper Dr. Zinthrop. Zinthrop was fired for experimenting with wasps, specifically enzyme extracts from the royal jelly of a queen wasp. Starlin funds his research it the hopes of creating a formula to slow the aging process, with the condition of Starlin being the human trial. The serums are not working fast enough, so Starlin gives herself extra doses, causing her to shed 20 years rapidly but also to periodically transform into a killer wasp.
Marshall P. David (1997). Celebrity Power; Fame in Contemporary Culture. May 16, 2010. Electronically retrieved from
Bonila, Denise M., and Levy, Beth, Eds. The Power of the Press. H. W. Wilson, 1999.
...uld be justifiable to emphasize that a good number of them find it sickening to miss the limelight. . Nonetheless, it goes without mentioning that celebrities get exploited because some gossip stories explore the things that would otherwise be considered to be private.
“Posts.” Fame is a dangerous Drug: A Phenomenological Glimpse of Celebrity.” N.p. ,n.d. Web 15. Feb 2014
There has always been a need and a desire to tap into the celebrity lifestyle. The paparazzo is our window into this world. While the paparazzi are important in getting the stunning images of celebrities smiling on the red carpet, they overstep boundaries when they snap images of said persons without makeup as they ask their private houses. Consider the vital issue of paparazzi reform. The job of paparazzi is stressful on the body and mind; being a celebrity with your life broadcasted at every second has similar effects. The physical and mental problems faced by the men and women responsible for the photos are frightening. There is a real privacy issue when talking about the paparazzi. Celebrities lose the luxury of a quiet home when they have a string of photographers outside their homes. Safety is imperative for those in any way involved with the paparazzi. Limitations should be applied to the paparazzi for the safety and sanity of all included.
Journalists are protected by freedom of the press that is mentioned in the first amendment to the constitution.
The public has been revolutionary to have access into celebrities’ private life thanks to the “paparazzi”. Definitely, celebrities will always be in front of the camera. It comes with the frame. Nevertheless, it does not justify photographing and the lives of people at the expanse of their privacy.
The celebrities have very little privacy because of the paparazzi. They go to extreme lengths just to get that one picture. They intrude and disrupt special occasions, but they also intrude on day to day things that the celebrities do. They co...
Photographing an individual whether famous or not in public will not violate that person’s privacy under the laws in most countries. Assuming the paparazzi isn’t assaulting someone or trespassing or otherwise doing something illegal while taking such a picture, he or she will not be violating the law. Public figures do not ask for a total invasion of their privitness .Few of us lead lives that are not classified into a newsworthy. Just because these people contribute to their profession in front of the world, it does not mean that they should be denied the right to privacy and respect. Therefore Paparazzi should be banned from exposing people’s private lives, any way they want.
The main targets of the paparazzi are the celebrities who enchant the public. The public’s obsession with that person encourages the paparazzi to pursue the celebrity and encourages them to participate in acceptable invasive antics. It is only when harm occurs that the public is outraged by the paparazzi’s newsgathering techniques.
After observing and researching all the sources portraying celebrities I have came into a conclusion that todays society it seems like all we want is to be accepted and we tend to look at other people and judge. Its not right, we all are different and thats what makes the world go round. It would be a pretty boring world if we were all the same. Celebrities deal with this everyday, I think the paparazzi know more about some celebrities lives than they actually do. They judge them for who they are and what they do, it is not right nor fair.
Do we as a society have the right to punish celebrities when they misbehave? Do celebrities have the right to become livid when they are focused on their immoral behavior? Do they love the media attention only when it benefits them? Before we can answer the above questions, would we, furthermore, can we live our life as a celebrity if given the opportunity? The perks of illimitable wealth, vacationing all over the world, housekeepers, chefs, being in receipt of freebies from designers, multiple homes in diverse parts of the world, chauffeurs, the finest foods, and all the other perks that come with being a celebrity?
Sisto, Joseph. "Do Celebrities Forfeit the Right to Privacy?" Lawyers Weekly jan. 2005: N.p. Web. 3 Dec. 2013. .
When living their day-to-day lives in the public eye, many celebrities must deal with gossip columnists, the infatuation of stalkers, and the unrelenting paparazzi. They follow celebrities into restaurants, their children’s schools, on vacations, and even their residential neighborhoods (Jones). By seeking out and publishing the whereabouts of celebrities, they cannot be sure who will find or come across that information. The paparazzi ...