Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Starbucks industry summary
Starbucks strategy analysis
Starbucks Industry analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Starbucks industry summary
Introduction
In today’s competitive and rapidly changing business environment, it’s important to understand the strategic issues opposite organizations and enhance the ability for long term success; Organizations must study the external and internal environment. Porter’s five forces model exams organizations external environment and value chain exams internal environment. Five forces aid businesses to determine the attractiveness and the profitability of a market they competing and assist organizations to make a qualitative evaluation of their strategic position. Wit and Meyer (2010: p264) suggests that the ultimate purpose of competitive strategy is to deal with rules in the industry and if possible make changes for the firms favor, whether this industry is local, or global or produces a product or service, the competition is embodied in five competitive forces: the entry of a new competitor, the bargaining power of buyers, the bargaining power of suppliers, the threat of substitutes and the rivalry among the existing competitors. I will apply Starbucks on my analysis.
¬¬¬¬The Threat of new entry
New competitors can raise, influence the degree of competition and profitability in the industry. The threat of new entry depends on the market entry barriers, these barriers can be present in different forms and are utilized to prevent an entry of new firms into an industry. Higher barriers exist in some industries (e.g. Pharmaceuticals, airline), whereas some industries have low barriers of entry e.g. restaurants (Jobber 2010; P: 706). “If entry barriers are low and newcomers expect little retaliation from entrenched competitors, the threat of entry is high and industry profitability is moderated. It is threat of entry, not wheth...
... middle of paper ...
...rter's Five Forces and Value Chain analysis are powerful strategic tools for Starbuck to assess its present dynamic and competitive industry. Understanding these strategic tools is starting point and essential for Starbuck towards developing a successful long-term strategy for the organizations going forward. It also provides Starbuck a foundation for sizing up its strength and weaknesses. Therefore Starbuck should use these analyses to create and sustain competitive advantages, in order to cope and incorporate industry conditions and organization’s capabilities into their strategy. Porter (2008: p88) suggests that five forces assist managers to develop a productive strategic action to better cope with industry competition, forecast & exploit changes in the industry and form balance between the five forces to build a more positive industry structure for the firm.
As strategy consultants of McCormick & Associates, we use Porters Five Forces Model as a framework when making a qualitative evaluation of a firm's strategic position (Appendix 1.2). These five forces determine the competitive intensity and therefore attractiveness of a market. These forces affect the ability of a company to serve its customers and make a profit. A change in any of the forces normally requires a company to re-assess the market place.
The 5-Force Industry Analysis first introduced by Michel Porter, Harvard Business School professor, a quarter-century ago. This theory examines the suppliers, buyers, product substitutes, existing firms’ rivalry and new entrants in a firm’s product market.
Porter’s Five Forces Model is a widely used tool by strategists to develop a competitive analysis, from which they will be able to develop strategies (David, 2013). When looking at Delta, it would be beneficial to look at the external forces this will help top management develop strategies to combat external factors, threats from external factors could potentially harm Delta. According to Porter, the nature of competitiveness in a given industry can be viewed as a composite of five forces: 1) Rivalry among competing firms, 2) Potential development of new competitors, 3) Potential development of substitute products, 4) Bargaining power of suppliers, 5) Bargaining power of
Porter’s Five Forces provides a strategic model from which Kraft can assess its position in the coffee industry. Within this model, a thorough analysis of the following elements will be executed: (1) potential entrants, (2) current rivalries among existing firms, (3) bargaining power of suppliers, (4) bargaining power of buyers, and (5) substitute products.
Porter’s competitive forces model includes five forces that need to be analysed. These forces include the intensity of rivalry from traditional competitors, threat of new market entrants, threat of substitute products and services, bargaining power of customers and bargaining power of suppliers (Laudon & Laudon, 2007). See diagram below;
New entrants to an industry, with a desire to gain market share, will put pressure on prices, costs and capital needed to compete. It can affect the profit potential.
The system adopted by 7-eleven maximizes the threat for new entrants. That’s means that threat of new entrants of 7-Eleven is low. It is because 7-Eleven has already reached economies of scale through maintaining a strong customer base and brand loyalty. Over the years, 7-Eleven has increases their customer and brand loyalty. The access to latest technology and capital investments in the same ensures that the barrier for entries for new entr...
· The threat of new entrants into an industry or a market served by a specific company.
The Porter five forces model (see Appendix 1) as an external analysis tool was established by Michael E. Porter and firstly announced in his book “Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors” in 1980 . The main idea of the Porter five forces concept is that the attractiveness of a market depends on the characteristic of the five competitive forces that have an impact on a company (see Appendix 2).
Emphasis on quality, Starbucks Experience, brand image, and important suppliers to dispute lower price contributions to competitors hence increasing profits
Overall, how satisfied are you , with [PRODUCT/SERVICE]? Please answer using the rating scale where (5) means "extremely satisfied" and (1) means "very unsatisfied."
In 2003, Starbucks was listed as one of the Fortune 500. Despite the ongoing recession, the company had managed a 31% increase in net revenues for the year. This was reasonable, considering they only spent about 1% of total sales on marketing. All of this, coupled with the fact that they were popular with customers and employees, was a sure recipe for success.
For this organizational analysis, I decided to analyze Starbucks. I chose Starbucks because they are the leading innovators in socially impactful business activities and personally, I love Starbucks coffee! Obviously, the point of this paper is not to talk about how good their products are, but to analyze how their organization is structured and identify potential for improvement. I have never worked at a Starbucks, but I have two friends that work at the location inside of Hy-Vee in Cedar Falls. After countless hours of research, talking to my friends about day-to-day activities, and actually going to Starbucks on numerous occasions over the past few years, I knew this was the organization that I would love to analyze.
Until the introduction of a “sixth force” in the mid-nineties, the “Porter’s Five Forces Model” as it was originally developed by Michael E. Porter in 1979 explained how “five competitive forces” determine industry attractiveness. Porter opined that in the fight to sustain long-term profitability, a firm must be strategic towards competition, and beyond competition, keep tabs on a broader set of competitive forces; customers who can drive prices down, suppliers who exercise some level of power, new entrants who might come in to compete for profits and substitute products and services that essentially place constraints on the profitability and growth on any industry. With the extension of this model, the sixth force (as shown in exhibit 1) included showed the impact of complimentary products and services on the attractiveness and overall profitability of an industry. In general, the Six Forces model proposes that the underlying structural drivers of any industry determine the performance of the players.
It is because porter’s five forces can give the managers in the corporate to analyse the current situation of their industry in a structured and understand easily way (Porter 2001). Based on the strategic management view, it is good for managers of any organization in the similar industry or sectors to understand the five competitive forces acting and between organizations in the similar industry or sector.