Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Relevance of psychology to sport
Relevance of psychology to sport
Relevance of psychology to sport
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Aslan Sinan Oktay
Sports and Litterature
Professor O’Donoghue
02.26.14
New Aspect to Bullfighting
“Furthermore what the crowd honors is the victor, tossing him flowers and gifts, which he gracious returns, it is no mans victory over the animal, for the bull is always defeated; it is man’s victory over ignorance, fear, necessity. Man has made his victory a spectacle, so that it may become a victory of all those watching him and recognizing themselves in it” (Barthes, 2007). This is a very interesting paragraph from ‘bullfighting’ by Barthes. It proposes that bullfighting is never fait because the bulls can never win, and that the joy in the ‘sport’ comes from realization that man is greater that beast. This paper will analyze this paragraph using two opposing books for reference, ‘death in the afternoon’ by Ernest Hemingway and ‘on bullfighting’ by A. L Kennedy.
Bullfighting is a popular sport in Spain and some Latin countries in the Americas. It involves teasing a bull into confronting a man, and the man ‘escaping death’ and finally killing the bull (Kennedy, 2001). There have been different opinions about the sport over the years. These opinions are captured by A. L Kennedy and Ernest Hemingway in their respective books.
One of the main appeals to bullfighting is association with death. A false move by the matadors is potentially fatal, because bulls are agitated, and they go after the matadors with a serious intent. Death is the main attraction to these sports. The book ‘On Bullfighting’ begins on a suicide attempt by the writer. However, a bad song spoils the moods and thus rods the situation of any dignity, which leads the author to change her mind (Kennedy, 2001). It proposes that the main attraction to death is dignity and...
... middle of paper ...
...different outlooks in the books may be a result of the time difference. For example, masculinity was traditionally perceived to be stronger (Hemingway, 1932). Therefore, men were attracted to rough sports to prove their manhood. However, there have been changes in recent times that shifted the focus towards other aesthetic aspects of human life.
In conclusion, both books take a differing view to bullfighting. However, in the end, they both tend to agree with Barthes that this is not really a sport. However, the view of this paper may be biased by the cultural values of contemporary times and the declining aesthetic value of violence.
References
Barthes, R. (2007). What is sport?. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hemingway, E. (1932). Death in the afternoon. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
Kennedy, A. L. (2001). On bullfighting. New York: Anchor Books.
In the New Yorker article “Offensive Play,” by Malcolm Gladwell, he makes a comparison between dogfighting and football, claiming that they tend to be more similar than people may conclude. Gladwell argues this because they both develop a negative effect on one’s body and brain causing several physical and mental changes that could possibly lead to death. However, some of these events that cause injury go without notice until later on in life when they have retired from their “glory days.”
His absence in the battlefield partly explains his untainted nature and contributes to the implied “unmanly” label he has earned for himself from Jake and the group. Hemingway strips away any semblance of masculinity in Cohn save his boxing talent. This is the extent of his masculinity. Cohn uses boxing to give him a “certain inner comfort in knowing he could knock down anybody who was snooty to him” (11). To combat his insecurity with his masculinity, he relies on boxing. However, Cohn still inevitably and obliviously throws in the towel in the fight of masculinity when Jake remarks that “being a very shy and thoroughly nice boy, he never fought except in the gym” (11). Cohn’s attempt at using the sport as a mechanism for practicing masculinity ultimately
The poem above speaks volumes about the nature of man’s best friend. Dogs are not inherently bad, but are rather “a product of their environment”. The same principle applies to the world’s most misunderstood breed of dog. When you hear the phrase “pit bull”, what do you think? A savage beast, murdered out of cold blood?
A matador is a bullfighter whose task is to kill the bull. Although most may think Matadors are men, there are also many women who have become matadors and are killing bulls for a living as well. The matador wears a ceremonial outfit called traje de luces, or suit of lights and a montera, which is a traditional folk hat. The red cape that the bullfighters wave is a muleta and the sword used to kill the bull is called the estoque. Six bulls are to be killed by three matadors during the bullfight. Each encounter lasts about 15 minutes. The three matadors, each followed by their assistants, the banderilleros and the picadors march into the ring to the accompaniment of traditional march rhythm music. When a bull first comes into the arena out of the bullpen gate, the matador greets it with a series of manoeuvres or passes, with a large cape. Fighting bulls charge instantly at anything that moves because of their natural instinct. Unlike domestic bulls they do not have to be trained to charge nor are they starved or tortured to make them savage. Ticket prices for bullfights can range from just a few euros to over 100 euros, depending on the seating area. Shaded areas (Sombra) happen to be more expensive than sunny ones (Sol). However, the better or more popular fights, and especially those during the San Isidro festival, are often sold-out almost
Hemingway refuses to romanticize his character. Being “tough” people, such as boxers, bullfighters, gangsters, and soldiers, they are depicted as leading a life more or less without thought. The world is full of such people, and it is unrealistic to put sublime thoughts into their heads.
“Roman Fever” and “Hills Like White Elephants” are two stories that on surface seem very different from one another, but through careful analysis the two are quite similar. Their similarities are mainly evident through the significant use of the dialogues in the both stories. “Roman Fever” has a third person omniscient narrator which the author allows to know the inner private thoughts of both characters, Mrs. Slade and Mrs. Ansley. In contrast, “Hills Like White Elephants” is composed in a third person limited narrative where very little is known about the thoughts of both Jig and the American. At first Ernest Hemingway’s short story can clearly be viewed as the most ambiguous out of the two. With its simplistic style, written mostly in straightforward dialogue which leaves the readers to contemplate over the ultimate outcome of the story and forces them to ...
as well as the needs and urges of a bull. This is why in the painting
use of the camera the sound and the mise en scene. I will analyze the
...tch football. Humans have had a natural interest, and fascination with violence and brutality, all throughout time. Modern censorship, has limited this somewhat morbid fascination, but many new movies, videogames, or television shows, supply the population with this desired entertainment. Scott’s film, Gladiator, reveals that human nature has changed very little, by recreating the bloody and violent Gladiator games, and the Roman Colloseum.
Research guided by conflict theory generally falls into the following categories: 1) studies of how athletes become alienated from their own bodies; 2) studies of how sports can be used to coerce and control people; 3) studies of sports and the development of commercialism in society; 4) studies of sports and various forms of nationalism and militarism; and 5) studies of sports and racism and sexism. (Coakley, 1998) In the book, Meggyesy provided examples of each of these categories which occurred during his footba...
Hemingway's characters in the story represent the stereotypical male and female in the real world, to some extent. The American is the typical masculine, testosterone-crazed male who just ...
The style of artwork from Bull Jumping was a regenerated wall painting derived out of the palace complex at Knossos, Crete, during the late Minoan period, 1550-1450 BCE. The Minoan painters created works of art on a large scale. The Minoan painters had a desire to paint views of nature and scenes of human activity. The artwork is depicted with continuous narrative art. This is defined by the continuous lines within the border. Within the outline border of the painting, the artwork exhibits repetition in shapes and colors. The representation of this piece displays naturalism in the form of human bodies in movement. There are three humans arranged within the painting. One female is arranged with extending arm motions, another figure clinches their hands around the bull’s horn, and the last figure extends arms around the bull’s body. The human activity demonstrates the power to control nature in a survival or entertainment mode. On the other hand, the bull’s body is very large and is extended o...
Coakley, J. J., & Donnelly, P. (2007). Violence in Sports . Sports in society: issues & controversies (9th ed., pp. 198-199). Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
We notice, right from the beginning of his life, that Ernest Hemingway was confronted to two opposite ways of thinking, the Manly way, and the Woman way. This will be an important point in his writing and in his personal life, he will show a great interest in this opposition of thinking. In this short story, Hemingway uses simple words, which turn out to become a complex analysis of the male and female minds. With this style of writing, he will show us how different the two sexes’ minds work, by confronting them to each other in a way that we can easily capture their different ways of working. The scene in which the characters are set in is simple, and by the use of the simplicity of the words and of the setting, he is able to put us in-front of this dilemma, he will put us in front of a situation, and we will see it in both sexes point of view, which will lead us to the fundamental question, why are our minds so different?
“Ayusta egnake ukitawa tawaci ptayela na wayate taku wiconi mos ognake kage kici ukitawa ukitakojakpaku pi.” This is a quote from Sitting Bull in the language of the Lakota sioux people. Sitting Bull was a Hunkpapa Lakota chief who was led his people against the resistance against the government. The quote means “Let us put our minds together and see what life we can make for our children.” It is very popular with the people who are protesting for the Dakota Access Pipeline.