Without the Laws in this country, the world would be full of chaos. (TalonsPhilosophy). The laws determine what is right and wrong, they allow us to make a conscious decision, and mould us into the people that allow a functioning society to evolve, people with virtues. Except when there is no law to assist you, the decision you make is extracted from what we define to be our morals. However, these morals aren't something you are born with, they are your own personal laws/rules that you develop from family, friends and surrounding community; such as the seven virtues; Humility, Kindness, Abstinence, Chastity, Patience, Liberality and Diligence. For some, that community is their religion, such as Christianity and Judaism; whilst for others it …show more content…
Berlin also mentions that Buddhists view of giving is an expression of the natural qualities of kindness and compassion; similar to traditional Buddhists, older Buddhists, who practiced 'giving alms, food, medicine and clothing to monks and to monasteries in exchange for teachings and merit. This relationship is seen to be a sacred mutual dependence, and merit is shared on both sides for the benefit of all. These good actions were believed to help them in their personal quest for Nirvana. ' From 'Budsas', "You perform real charity if you can give freely without expecting anything in return". If someone donates and expects material or verbal praise then they are only performing an act of bartering, a charitable person should not make them feel indebted to them. "The act of true charity is wholesome, has no strings attached". Buddhist view charity as an act to reduce personal greed, which hinders spiritual growth. To avoid hindering their spiritual growth, Buddhists try their best to reduce their selfishness by giving what they have for the benefit of others, whether …show more content…
There is no set law saying one must donate to charities. There are laws on what makes a charity legitimate, such as the Charites Act 2013, these said charities have to be not-for-profit, only have charitable purposes that are for the public benefit, not have disqualifying purpose, not be an individual, a political party or a government entity. So why do Atheists donate to charity? Jac Dittmar, Communications Team for the Atheist Foundation of Australia, revealed his thoughts through email about the reality of Charity in Atheist. 'Atheists are absolutely no different in their moral/ethical propensity than healthy, well-adjusted and intelligent humans beings anywhere in the world, be the theists or not.' Dittmar believes that if a rigorous and honest examination of religions will expose them all as nothing more than ancient superstitions born out of ignorance and promoted by those who have an interest in doing so. The only difference between atheist and theist donating is that atheist are charitable due to recognising distress and it awakens a desire to alleviate- whether it be from compassion or pity, empathy or the loft desire to make a difference. In a most bias opinion, Dittmar also determines that those who aren't atheist are considered to be have an 'ethical egoism' and only donate to charity as a way to buy themselves a ticket into heaven, With a non-belief of heaven, it can be logically
laws is to keep the bad things out from the old society out such as
Even forms of human beings preforming selfless acts derives from ones desire to help others, which in a way makes that person feel importance. Blessed Teresa of Calcutta, better known as Mother Teresa, devoted her life to helping those in great need. To many these acts may appear as selfless and gallant acts that are not performed by anyone with any type of ego. Yet when taking a psychological look at why she performed such acts they may appear a somewhat more for herself. Every time anyone does anything, even when for someone else, they are doing it for some type of feeling that they experience. With the holiday season approaching, there will be a specific emphasis on giving unlike any other time of the year. We give yes to show gratitude for someone we love, but also to experience the joy in seeing someone enjoy something they them self-caused. Even while being selfless humans have the unique ability to still be doing something that involves caring for them self. This outlook toward the human condition completely debunks Wolf’s claim that “when caring about yourself you are living as if you are the center of the universe.” When choosing to do anything positive or negative, for others or for yourself, you are still taking your self-interest into consideration, making it
In a world of suffering and pain the Dalai Lama said, “Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them humanity cannot survive”. The Dalai Lama has become a figurehead for Buddhism worldwide for his compassion and warm smiles. Buddhism has extended beyond meditation and even monks such as the Dalai Lama. The basic concepts of compassion and mindfulness in Buddhism are being applied in the daily lives of lay people who need it the most.
On this world, laws can be very important and can be the solution for keeping this nation and other countries together. Without laws, people would just do whatever they want to do and not think twice about it for the simple fact that they would know that there will not be any major consequences. Martin proves why these laws are so important to us and he also explains how they are important. There are many points which he proves that I totally agree with and there are also some things that I do not necessarily agree with
Buddhism is one of the prominent and influential religions and philosophies of the world. A basic tenet of Buddhism is that worldly desires and possessions cause all suffering. To absolve one’s self of necessities beyond basic human survival is one of the many plateaus that Buddhists strive to achieve. Furthermore, Buddhists free themselves from temptation via seclusion from society and attempt to allow nature to support them. They believe that Nirvana, the ascension to heaven, can be achieved by freeing oneself of earthly desires.
He makes it a point that when we really feel the need to help others out of spite we feel more at peace with ourselves and that creates a building block for our own happiness and enjoyment of all things. The Dalai Lama argues where else could the greatest and most meaningful form of happiness come from if not from sharing the love and understanding with every person on earth regardless of your dislike in them, the difference in social class, or the level of work you do at your jobs. He says, “Compassion and love are not mere luxuries. As the source both of inner and external peace, they are the fundamental to the continued survival of our species.” (Dalai Lama, pg. 67).
From the moment we are born we have the tendency of craving the worldly desires that we are exposed to. Its part of human nature to want an ideal life where you are either wealthy, powerful, happy or all of the above without any suffering involved. Although that ideal sounds phenomenal, it is the thought of limitation that drives many people to seek for something more than just worldly pleasures. As some stay within the lines of an insatiable life, others come to the realization that living a life with nothing but worldly pleasures and goals are ultimately not everlasting. This is the point where people go on to pursue something bigger than themselves, something that gives them a purpose and infinite joy or as most would call it, a religion. One of the most fascinating major world religions that many have chosen to follow for centuries is Buddhism. A very complex, yet intriguing religion that seeks for a way of life that ultimately releases a person from suffering and leads them to inner peace and joy.
...esult, the more directly one sees their personal efforts impact someone else, the more happiness one can gain from the experience of giving. Sometimes generosity requires pushing past a feeling of reluctance because people all instinctively want to keep good things for themselves, but once one is over this feeling, they will feel satisfaction in knowing that they have made a difference in someone else’s life. However, if one lives without generosity but is not selfish, they can still have pleasure from other virtues.
There are two types of laws. There are conventional laws and natural laws. Conventional laws are those laws arrived at through consensus between those governed and the government. Natural laws are those laws that are universal and are derived from the natural order of the world. In my opinion, natural law cannot work in our society, as they are not suitable for our environment and how we live together as a society. Natural laws can’t work without causing trouble and chaos between everyone, so why should we place them in our society? On the other hand, conventional laws are governed and are made to be just for the society. That is why we need conventional laws in our society, not natural laws. Also, since conventional laws are governed, they are made sure to be enforced, and breaking them will only ruin that one person for what they have done, not the society as a whole.
We are a nation of laws because we have to build a foundation to strengthen the government and be well run country. everyone is governed the same way. To protect people from each other. It’s to prevent crime before it happens to assure every American are safe and in order to
Growing up, I was taught to not steal, kill, etc., or else I will be caught by the police and put in prison “in the name of the law”. It made sense to me that “law” is
It involves the mutual feeling and authentic way of giving generously. generosity has nothing to do with random actions however it can be an essential focus on existence. Generosity usually entails giving not just whatever, but typically giving those things that are beneficial to others. The things you can genuinely give regularly fluctuates it could possibly be time, money, motivation, assistance, etc. The outcomes of the situations as a rule anticipates to heighten the actual comfort of the recipient. Generosity isn’t just only in the region of assisting persons with less privileges than ourselves. It is roughly giving liberally, with no stipulations, and lacking a need for justification. Generosity isn’t just exclusively centered around someone’s financial position, but in its place, take in account of the individual 's wholesome purposes of looking in the open for the general public’s conjoint wellbeing and offerings from the heart and soul. Generosity ought to be a sign of the individual 's enthusiasm to lend a hand to others. For example, an individual who decides to consume their whole summer vacation and dedicates it to volunteering at a hospital to oversee and aid the disabled adolescents and adults could perhaps come about as wasteful and distasteful for a lot of people, on the other hand it can be seen as highly worthwhile and fulfilling to
Law serves to preserve the interests of the majority such that everyone has equal opportunity at and access to resources. If everyone were to pursue their own self-interest certain people would be better off than others and or have greater advantage over others and completely dominate over them which would eventually lead to chaos.
Law is one of the most important elements that transform humans from mere beasts into intelligent and special beings. Law tells us what is right and wrong and how we, humans, should act to achieve a peaceful society while enjoying individual freedoms. The key to a successful nation is a firm, strong, and fair code of high laws that provides equal and just freedom to all citizens of the country. A strong government is as important as a firm code of law as a government is a backbone of a country and of the laws. A government is a system that executes and determines its laws. As much as fair laws are important, a capable government that will not go corrupt and provide fair services holds a vital role in building and maintaining a strong country.
Both law and morality serve to regulate behaviour in society. Morality is defined as a set of key values, attitudes and beliefs giving a standard in which we ‘should’ behave. Law, however, is defined as regulating behaviour which is enforced among society for everyone to abide by. It is said that both, however, are normative which means they both indicate how we should behave and therefore can both be classed as a guideline in which society acts, meaning neither is more effective or important than the other. Law and morals have clear differences in how and why they are made. Law, for example, comes from Parliament and Judges and will be made in a formal, legal institution which result in formal consequences when broken. Whereas morals are formed under the influence of family, friends, media or religion and they become personal matters of individual consciences. They result in no formal consequence but may result in a social disapproval which is shown also to occur when breaking the law.