Brutus Flaws

805 Words2 Pages

Brutus fully embodies the archetype of a tragic hero through his tragic flaws, character arc, and ultimate downfall. Brutus, who is a prominent figure in the Roman Republic, is often characterized by his idealism and rigidity. (Core 20) These very qualities, however, become instrumental in his tragic downfall, acting as his deadly flaws. Shakespeare crafts Brutus as a character whose actions are driven by a deep sense of duty to Rome, but his flaws ultimately lead him to his tragic downfall. Through Brutus' journey, Shakespeare invites audiences to reflect on the dangers of allowing personal ideals to blind one to the complexities of reality. Brutus’ character also warns the audience against too much rigidity, teaching them to take others’ …show more content…

Without the favor of the people, it becomes certain that Brutus and the conspirators are doomed, as their cause relies heavily on popular support. In the absence of this support, Brutus and the conspirators face isolation, internal discord, and ultimately defeat. Brutus’ inability to adapt or compromise sealed his fate, highlighting his tragic flaw of rigidity. Through Brutus’ character arc and his tragic flaws, Shakespeare teaches his audience to be careful of one’s own rigidity and idealism. As these very flaws lead to a tragic downfall for Brutus, the audience is warned against too much rigidity and idealism. Brutus’ idealism, compelling him to spare Antony, contributes significantly to his downfall, as Antony later seeks vengeance and prevails. Had Brutus not been blinded by his idealism, he would have seen the reality. Furthermore, Brutus is stubborn and does not take others’ opinions into account, leading him to doom. Despite Cassius’ pleading, Brutus did not sway in his decision to let Antony speak at Caesar’s funeral. When Antony speaks, he is able to gain the favor of the Romans, taking away what was essential to the conspirators: popular

Open Document