Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of leadership in the military
Importance of leadership in the military
The importance of military leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of leadership in the military
British Generals in the Great War Ever since the first world war the quote 'lions led by donkeys' has been used to describe the British army, and refers to the brave troops as 'lions' that are being led by stupid 'donkey' generals. It came about as much of the public and soldiers opinions stated that the generals were incompetents who led their men to the death regardless of whether the battle they were fighting was a lost cause. The quote originated from the German troops, who respectfully commented on the British soldiers' bravery and upon how their lives where so carelessly wasted by their 'idiot' generals; many modern books, films and tv shows, for example hilarious 'Blackadder Goes Forth', still echo this belief. Is this however a just assessment of the British generals of World War 1? This portrait of moronic, heartless generals was rather popular and actually stemmed from many very real facts. Evidently, the main reason for these opinions is the alarmingly great number of casualties that each battle produced; the worst such example would be the Battle of the Somme that had raged from the 1st of July 1916, when over 19 000 British soldiers were killed and around 57 000 were wounded during the first day alone. Soon battles became referred to as 'slaughter' rather than fighting, and it seemed to many that the generals' strategy was to simply outkill the enemy - this was based on reality, the generals' view was that as the Germans had less men it did not matter if the Allies lost more, eventually they would still prevail. The long list of fatalities alarmed public and soldiers alike - but what appeared even more shocking was ... ... middle of paper ... ... the generals were indeed responsible for a portion of that loss they ultimately achieved their goal by winning the war - therefore, they musn't have been complete 'donkeys'. It is wrong that these men were reffered to as beasts - if not for them, if not for leaders, there would have been no strategy at all and the entire conflict would surely have been won by the Germans. In order to fight effectively there must be strategy, for there to be strategy there must be order, for there to be order there must be leadership; whoever the leaders are must be able to make difficult decisions and choices of literally life and death. Mistakes cannot be avoided, but they are important to learn from and to better the strategies from. The soldiers of the First World War were indeed lions; but their generals were far from donkeys.
...m: not only was he a mere colonial, he was a non professional to boot, and he was much younger that th earmy commanders who would have reported to him. Far from
Even though German high commanders have received much praise, they relied on the ability of senior German generals. Many commanders lacked ideas for victory and often were indecisive which led to unwillingness of using modern technology and resources to conduct a successful war effort. Commanders had little understanding on what was really needed; many only thought more men would successfully defeat the allied forces, along with an increase in firepower all which strained the troubled home nation. Not only did the war effort rely on the efficiency of the army and armed forces, but it also relied on the homefront. The German homefront felt the brunt of the war and the British naval blockade was not helping.
...e time frame, it would have (1) caused huge damage to German strategic posture, (2) required major German force redeployments away from the Eastern Front, and (3) enabled a more rapid British and American occupation of Germany, leading to more advantageous German surrender conditions and negotiations with the Soviets. The result would have been a different post-war geopolitical framework aligned more positively towards the U.S. and Britain.
The Battle of Britain as a Turning Point in the Defeat of German in World War Two
World War I, also known as the Great War, lasted from the summer of 1914 until the late fall of 1918. The war was fought between the Allies, which consisted mainly of the United Kingdom, France, and the Russian Empire, and the Central Powers, which consisted mainly of the German Empire, the Ottoman Empire, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and the Kingdom of Bulgaria (Alliances - Entente and Central Powers). In total, it is estimated that twelve million civilians and nine million combatants died during this horrific and devastating war (DeGroot 1). When the war first began in 1914, many people thought that it would be a war of movement that would quickly be over. However, that changed when the Germans, who were trying to reach and capture the city of Paris in France, were forced to retreat during the Battle of the Marne in September 1914 (Ellis 10). German General von Falkenhayn, who felt that his troops must at all cost hold onto the parts of France and Belgium that they had overtaken, ordered his men to dig in and form defensive trench lines (Ellis 10). The Allies could not break through the enemies lines and were forced to create trenches of their own (Ellis 10). This was only the beginning of trench warfare. A war of movement had quickly come to a standstill on the Western Front. A massive trench line, 475 miles long, quickly spread and extended from the North Sea to the Swiss Frontier (Ellis 10). With neither side budging, soldiers were forced to live in the most miserable of conditions. Simply put, life in the trenches was a living hell. A lieutenant of the 2nd Scottish rifles wrote, “No one who was not there can fully appreciate the excruciating agonies and misery through which the men had to go [through] in those da...
World War II was a critical period for America, not to mention the world as well. Throughout all the fighting and bloodshed, Americans returned home successful. Over 700,000 soldiers were disabled after the war, thankful for their lives. All the success and happiness of this country wouldn’t have been possible if not for the bravery, courage, and strategies of our U.S. Generals. They provided the smarts, the morale, and motivation for our soldiers, navy, and airforce to come out victorious and recognized as the best in world history. The five major generals (George Marshall, Dwight Eisenhower, George Patton, Omar Bradley, and Douglas MacArthur) shall never be forgotten as the best generals America has ever had.
the start of the war in July 1914 and towards the end in 1918. From
... Allies. In 1933, Prime Minister Lloyd George wrote in his war memoirs, ‘The conclusion is inescapable that Germany and her allies were defeated in the field.’ Even so, I believe in contradiction to the Prime Minister, without an already unstable Germany due to a lack of resources and food, the war on land would not have been so successful in driving Germany to surrender.
Resnick p. 15. However, these events infuriated Hitler who refused to believe that the Germans had been defeated fairly on the battlefield.... ... middle of paper ... ...
“The Battle of the Somme, July-November 1916, was the largest military encounter in history to date, involving over 1.5 million men”, says Furtado, author for History Today (10). Out of this 1.5 million, around 75 to 83 percent died or were injured by the end of the Battle of the Somme. Furtado later remarks that “...troops from Canada, Newfoundland..., South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, West Indies, India, China, Senegal, North Africa, Madagascar, Somalia, Indochina, and others” were all at the Somme (11). The troops at the battle were diverse. Even though this was an international battle with many different ethnicities, it was not about each individual or county. The Battle of the Somme was between the British and French armies against the German armies. The Battle of the Somme foreshadowed the futility of fighting World War I and concluded with few strategic military achievements, many losses, and an inconclusive victory.
Conscription Conscription was introduced... ... middle of paper ... ... re that this could never happen again. America on the other hand wanted to keep Germany from being punished too much incase any thing like this happen again. Britain was in the middle of all this.
As the cold hand of death swept over the remnants of France, British Prime Minister, Winston Churchill, orated on the imminent battle that would rage over his homeland and the foreboding struggle for survival that was now facing Britain:
...ization but it caught up to other European powers. If they won the war they would surpass those previous European powers such as France and Britain, and come out on top. All the countries that took part of the war fought because they wanted to protect the power their country had at the time and did not want to fall due to the rise of another. Since the objective of the war was really to stop other countries from gaining more power, Germany was not entirely wrong in how they fought against the Allies.
Back in the days of the Vietnam War our country was looking for a leader to help liberate the threat that the North Vietnamese and the Vietcong posed to our country. And in that time the United States was looking for someone to lead our country into battle. So the U.S had chosen William Westmorland a graduate from West Point who had won the Pershing Sword for his great accomplishments in his school.
which would be one of the factors that kept Germany alive in World War II. With