Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ww1 effect of us involvement
Technology and weapons of ww1
Technology and weapons of ww1
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ww1 effect of us involvement
There were many factors in the war which contributed to the Allied victory in 1918, one of these being the war at sea. It is important to compare the effectiveness of the war at sea with the other factors affecting the victory of the Allies in the First World War; these factors being the American entry into the war, the war on land, the war in the air and the development of weapons. I will be trying to evaluate the extent to which the war at sea was the most important reason for the Allied victory, because I believe that it was the most significant factor that aided the Allies in winning the war in 1918. The naval tactics used by both sides played a very significant role in the First World War. The British navy, which was stronger than the German navy, went to great lengths to maintain control of the sea, pinning German fleets at their ports, as Germany isolated parts of the British fleet in order to weaken them. The only key naval battle between 1914 and 1918 occurred in May 1916: the battle of Jutland, which is often considered a British victory due to the fact that after the battle, the German fleet ‘fled’ and remained at their ports for the remainder of the war. Despite this, Britain suffered the loss of approximately thrice as many men and lost more ships than Germany. However, Britain was far more successful in using blockades to their advantage, stopping supplies getting into Germany, weakening the country’s army and civilians. Convoy systems were also effective in making sure that Germany would not be able to retaliate against this action. The war fought at sea was described by John Laffin in ‘Butchers and Bunglers of the First World War’ as playing ‘the most decisive part in winning the war.’ He claimed that it had ‘impo... ... middle of paper ... ... Allies. In 1933, Prime Minister Lloyd George wrote in his war memoirs, ‘The conclusion is inescapable that Germany and her allies were defeated in the field.’ Even so, I believe in contradiction to the Prime Minister, without an already unstable Germany due to a lack of resources and food, the war on land would not have been so successful in driving Germany to surrender. From the evidence I have used, I have drawn the conclusion that each factor was of importance in winning the war and without each of them the Allies may not have been victorious. Nonetheless, in my researched opinion, the war at sea was the most important reason that the Allies won the war, followed by the USA entering the war and the war on land respectively, because each factor would not have been as effective if it wasn’t for the devastation of Germany by the naval tactics used by the British.
The outbreak of World War One was accompanied by new strategies, innovations, and inventions that developed modern warfare. World War One saw the widespread use of everything from artillery to machine guns and airplanes to submarines. World War One also saw the world’s most powerful navy, Great Britain’s Royal Navy, pitted against the up and coming German Imperial Navy. From Britain’s effective use of the naval blockade to Germany’s terrifying unrestricted submarine warfare, both sides were constantly looking for new strategies to implement.
To set the stage for this battle, we must first understand what the British were thinking at the time. The British had not ...
The involvement of all aspects of the military in which the Central Powers did not have or could not produce in times of need. The advantage of this was showed through the defeat of the Germans. There many aspects of the war that aided the success of allied forces during 1918. Not only by the failure of the German army, but the succession of victorious and improving military tactics of the allied military services. The ability of the allies to sustain a consistent supply of materials further heightened the ability of securing a German defeat.
I will also discuss how the young, naive soldiers arrived at war, not knowing what warfare entailed. They were shocked by the conditions and the casualties. I will also discuss the bravery shown by the ANZACS in the most dangerous conditions. I will conclude with my reasons for why the Gallipoli campaign holds such value and importance in Australian history and ideology. Australian men were very keen to get involved in the war because they felt that it was their duty and if they didn’t go to war it would make them look cowardly.
At the beginning of the war, the preconceptions of each side show exactly why Britain was destined for failure. On the American team,
When the Great War began, Australia went to war as a nation which not only held its own but was invaluable to many ...
"A general who wears down 180,000 of the enemy by expending 400,000 men...has something to answer for." This idea from military historian C.E.W Bean is the main line of argument from traditionalist historians. They represent General Douglas Haig, British Commander-in-Chief of the BEF from 1915 to the end of the war in 1918, in a critical, damning light: a hopelessly incompetent general with a willingness to sacrifice the men of Britain for a few metres of muddy ground. On the converse of this interpretation is a revisionist perspective of Haig as a caring ‘architect of victory’, bringing long-term achievements with his perceptive strategies. With an examination of these two seemingly polemic perspectives and primary evidence, judgement, albeit a complex and multifaceted one, can be reached on both these smaller debates and of Douglas Haig’s role in World War One: villain or vanquisher?
By December 1914 the First World War had reached a dilemma on the western front that neither the triple entente nor the triple alliance had expected. The war had reached a stalemate, a state where both sides are so evenly balanced that neither can breakthrough against the enemy. The advances in Technology played a big role in creating the stalemate through strong defensive weaponry such as Machine Guns and Artillery, this caused ‘trench warfare’ (BOOK 48). Trench war is when troops from both sides are protected from the enemy’s firepower through trenches. Many advances in technology also attempted to break the stalemate throughout the war with tanks, gas and aircraft, these however failed. Eventually the stalemate was broken through a combination of improved technology, new strategies and the blockading of the German ports.
As students of history in the 21st century, we have many comprehensive resources pertaining to the First World War that are readily available for study purposes. The origin of these primary, secondary and fictional sources affect the credibility, perspective and factual information resulting in varying strengths and weaknesses of these sources. These sources include propaganda, photographs, newspapers, journals, books, magazine articles and letters. These compilations allow individuals to better understand the facts, feeling and context of the home front and battlefield of World War One.
Field, Frank. British and French Operations of the First World War. Cambridge (England); New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
In addition, having lost the war, the humiliated Germans were forced by the Allies to sign the Treaty of Versailles in 1919 that officially ended World War I. According to the harsh terms of the treaty, Germany had to hand over many of its richest industrial territories to the victors, and was made to pay reparations to the Allied countries it devastated during the war. Germany lost its pride, prestige, wealth, power, and the status of being one of Europe's greatest nations. (Resnick p. 15)
The outcome of the Battle of Britain was greatly dependant upon the circumstances, politics and preparedness of each opposing side for the impending battle that was to be fought. The map of Europe was awash in Nazi red as the German army moved closer towards its goal of domination:
O’Neill, William L. World War II A Student Companion. 1 ed. William H. Chafe. New York, New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
they led to the success of the Allied forces. It will also discuss how the
This needed to be won for many reasons and not just to help the chances of war. By the time of 1940 there was a population of Malta of nearly 350,000 and if Germany had taken over the Island than many more than just the 3,000 citizens that were killed could have been killed, and even more in captivity and in danger. Many lives could have been lost and if it was lost than many would have been lost. Some people say that the war could have been won without this war but this was most likely wrong, if the Mediterranean was lost then so was the war, there was no room to lose this. If Malta was lost then there would be a chance to set up more Airfields and more Military bases for Germany. If these were setup then there would be a perfect opportunity to have a shorter path to Britain and other European places and would have different unprotected areas to strike an attack by Air or sea. If Britain had their bases set up facing Germany in the expectations that there would be an attack from that angle. It would make one of the fronts of Britain less protected and more susceptible to a fatal attack that could be the end of the war. Whoever says that the Malta Convoys was not crucial to the victory does not know the importance the the Mediterranean sea in World War 2, it was a strong area to have a Military base and a great overall place to own to get the advantage in a