Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
American colonization history
British colonization of India
American colonization history
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: American colonization history
By 1920, the British Empire was one of the most dominant empires the world has seen owning a quarter of the globe. India was in the grasp of the British. Once controlled by the British East India Company as a placement for cotton, indigo, and tea, the British sought and took India’s political, economical, and social power completely after the Sepoy Rebellion in 1857. With an abundant amount of resources only the British could dream of and a massive population with the potential of being consumers, India was no doubt the “Jewel in the Crown” of the British Empire. Britain’s government in India ran smoothly, creating massive infrastructure across the country and education that would create an elite class of Indians. On the contrary, the British …show more content…
When India gained independence 136,000 bridges had been constructed with 10,000 miles of track joining parts of the nation(Lalvani). These products of the British would make a distinct factor in making India the world's greatest railway employers with 1.6 million(Lalvani). During British rule in India however, these railroads were fast lanes for the British that were made to collect and extract raw materials back to England and to be sold back to India(Gandhi). With the large portion of raw materials being shipped and extracted to England, many Indians felt they were being robbed in their own country. India within 40 years after the East India Company would have 22 bases supplying England with raw materials, which helped India’s economy(Lalvani). In reality however more cheap products from England were flooding and destroying much of the Indian economy when Dhaka, once the greatest center of cloth production had several hundred thousand weavers in 1760, then plummeted in the 1820’s with only 50,000(Doc#3). The loss of jobs in India and the loss of their raw materials would leave India stripped of any wealth while the British soaked up all the riches that they have taken …show more content…
By 1914 when the British brought vaccines to combat malaria and smallpox, in which the life expectancy of Indians improved(Lalvani). On the contrary, however famines only increased while the British were controlling India and 40 famines total occurred killing 58 million people(Doc#7). Not only did this mean that the British ley millions of people die under their control, but they simply ignored the fact that they would have anything to do with it. Young Indians were starting to be packed off to Britain to study to return home well trained(Lalvani). Quite the opposite was happening as most of the population of India, about 8 percent of people actually knew how to read and write, while only increasing their percentage after India gained independence(Doc#5). This shows that the British only made good schools for their own people while the Indians were left out of the
They built roads and railroads. British rule brought peace and order to the countryside. They revised the legal system to promote justice for the Indians, regardless of class. Indian landowners and princes, who still owned territory, grew rich from exporting cash crops such as cotton and jute. The British introduced the telegraph and the postal system as a means of communication.
This caused the Indians to starve because they depended on the British’s gifts to hunt and trade. The British didn’t respect the Indian and disregard their culture and what they follow.
Not only did the inequality and separation of the Indian society frustrate the citizens of India, but the imperialism Britain had upon them as well. In the early 20th century, Indian nationalists wanted to take a stand against the British rule and make India independent. The British created unfair laws that created a nationalist movement in India to regain their freedom. He believed that there should not be a Caste System because of one’s birth.
The British considered Indian civilization to be inferior and implemented their western ways, overriding ancient Indian customs. Nevertheless, it cannot be denied that British imperialism in India resulted in both positive as well as negative reforms in political, economic and social aspects of its new colony. To begin with, one can observe that the British colonizers did indeed improve Indian civilization by developing means of communication and transport. They built a great number of bridges, over 40,000 miles of railway and paving an astounding 70,000 miles of road (Doc. 4. The adage of the adage.
In 1879, the Carlisle Indian Industrial School was the first off-reservation Indian school opened by Army officer, Richard Pratt. Pratt based the program off of a program he started at an Indian prison. Pratt quoted an Army general in a speech he gave, “A great general has said that the only good Indian is a dead one.” Pratt said that while he agreed with the sentiment, he felt it was better to, “Kill the Indian in him, and save the man” (npr.org/templates). Consequently, Indian children were taken to these schools in an effort to civilize them and upon arrival were given European style clothes, haircuts, and new names. They were forbidden to speak in their native tongue or to engage in cultural practices and were severely disciplined if caught doing so; this total immersion into white culture put these children into an inconceivable torment. While attending the school, white families could make application for pupils to work their land, now the “In...
In India the British colonization had more positive affects than negative. For Instance, When the British colonized India they built 40,000 miles of railroad and 70,000 miles of paved roadway. As a result the British made it much easier to travel across India. Another good affect that the British had on India was the jump in agriculture, through large scale irrigation works. About 30 million acres were put into cultivation. Industrialization had also begun. Because of all these reasons almost no famine existed in British colonial India. The English also built many institutions in India and setup a productive government. "They have framed wise laws and have established courts of justice"(The Economic History Of India Under Early British Rule). In addition to all these positive affects, Britain also linked India to the modern world through modern science and modern thought.
This investigation seeks to discover whether or not the Sepoy revolution in 1857 had a sufficient impact on India’s rise to independence and separation from the British Empire. The Sepoy revolution was a revolution of the Sepoy soldiers in 1857, and complete independence from the British Empire was not achieved by Indians until 1947. Therefore, did the Sepoy revolution catalyze their rise to independence, or was independence inevitable? The impact of the Sepoy Revolution will be found by looking at the effects of the Sepoy revolution and determining whether or not they were key factors in the rise to independence. A variety of sources will be used. Two important sources that will be used during this investigation are Indian Summer by Alex Von Tunzelmann and Empire: How Britain Made The Modern World by Niall Ferguson.
Reyhner, Jon. “American Indians out of school: A Review of school-based Causes and Solutions.” Journal
There is no doubt that British imperialism had a large impact on India. India, having previously been an group of independent and semi-independent princedoms and territories, underwent great change under British administration. Originally intended to consolidate their hold on India by establishing a population that spoke the same language as their rulers, the British decision in the 1830s to educate Indians in a Western fashion, with English as the language of instruction, was the beginning of a chain of events, including a rise in Indian nationalism, that led to Indian resentment of British imperialism and ultimately to the loss of British control over India.
" India was where the riches of the world came from, the jewel in the crown of the British Empire. The British needed to dispel the threat of other Europeans in Africa to maintain control of India, and they did so efficiently. They quickly gained control of both the major sea routes to India and then turned their eyes to the rest of the continent. Whether the British were trying to foster public support or prevent another nation from becoming a threat, all British actions in Africa were directly or indirectly linked to India. The British were motivated by their desire to become powerful, and they skillfully combined enterprise and conquest to create a globe spanning empire centered around the wealth of India.
1 Moore, Robin J., "Imperial India, 1858-1914", in Porter, Andrew, Oxford History of the British Empire: The Nineteenth Century, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2001a, p.422-446,
The relationship between Britain and Indian begins with trade. The British presence within India began simply as a result of trade. There was wealth to be found within India, goods and materials more abundant within this country. Through trade connections, the East Indian Company had the ability to trade goods such as salt, Indigo dye, and silk. The East Indian Company with its access to valuable material would over time become a major player in the trading industry, accounting for a large percentage of worldwide trade.
She discusses a cycle of how starvation reduces labour and how reduced labour leads to more starvation. Although this is a valid point, she fails to address the fact that the Indians did have ways of overcoming or at least coping better with scarcity, through careful farming techniques and social and cultural systems of security and insurance, but these were destroyed by colonialism in the late 18th century. If the British did not destroy these original coping mechanisms,
The decision to grant independence to India was not the logical culmination of errors in policy, neither was it as a consequence of a mass revolution forcing the British out of India, but rather, the decision was undertaken voluntarily. Patrick French argues that: “The British left India because they lost control over crucial areas of the administration, and lacked the will and the financial or military ability to recover that control”.
The British administered India for a period of about two centuries and brought about revolutionary changes in