Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Charity begins at home do you agree or disagree
Charity begins at home do you agree or disagree
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Charity begins at home do you agree or disagree
Charity begins at home. Does this expression apply to the principles of the British government? As billions of pounds are relentlessly channelled into foreign countries, over thirteen million people at home in the UK are living below the low income threshold of under than £110 per week. This includes nearly four million children suffering from a disadvantaged childhood. This is due to the lack of financial assistance for poor families from the Government. By cutting the foreign aid budget the Government could increase investment in the impoverished children of their own country.
The way in which foreign aid is distributed is highly ineffective and fails to achieve its sole purpose. Corruption ravages the developing world; greedy diplomats and fraudulent officials are often known to embezzle vast amounts of the aid money given to help those most in need. As Lord P. T. Bauer of London School for Economics famously said, foreign aid is “an excellent method for transferring money from poor people in rich countries to rich people in poor countries.” The money does not reach those who need it but is instead pocketed by dishonest members of government in foreign countries. Over the past years more than half a billion pounds have been invested in Africa yet there is little visual improvement in extreme poverty, deprivation and the child mortality rate. Evidently, Britain’s aid scheme is uselessly trying to combat poverty against a brick wall of bureaucracy. Without doubt this money would be better invested within the UK improving health and education and lowering the deficit.
As Britain flaunts its ‘wealth’ to the globe, many have come to see the country as a place of new and better opportunities; the UK has long been a hot spot for m...
... middle of paper ...
...profile/liberia http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-13729504 https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/67317/SID-2012.pdf https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/261138/Table1a.csv/preview http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9545584/Poverty-barons-who-make-a-fortune-from-taxpayer-funded-aid-budget.html http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/david-camerons-cuts-leading-nhs-2332522 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2343683/Britains-foreign-aid-madness-Cuts-home-STILL-hand-G8-country.html http://www.nhscareers.nhs.uk/explore-by-career/doctors/pay-for-doctors/ http://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/continuing-failure-foreign-aid http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/give-a-man-a-fish.html http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/jan/21/flood-defence-cuts-3bn-damages-uk-climate-change
The United States continues to give around $550 billion in aid to other countries each year, making America the world's top donor by far (Richardson). While the United States government only supplies $252 billion to needy Americans each year. Former Assistant to the President for Communications, Patrick Buchanan said, "The idea that we should send endless streams of tax dollars all over the world, while our own country sinks slowly in an ocean of debt is, well, ludicrous" (Foreign Aid). The United States need to give money to support the domestic impoverished rather than supporting developing foreign countries because the poverty and homelessness in America is increasing faster than the aid necessary to reduce this trend. Part of the reason that the United States should aid the domestic impoverished is that some foreign countries cannot be trusted with the money given to them and in certain cases, the money intended to aid countries are harmful for that country’s well-being.
The best way to ensure that the government is in a position to help others is to ensure that it is in a stable economic position. I end this essay by saying, it can be said that there are a few utilitarian individuals who would disagree with the stance that Peter Singer has taken based on the fact that individuals and other bodies cannot be expected to give more than they are able to. Despite comparing their generosity with other funds, it should be noted that it is these same investments that are more likely to provide the financial stability for them to continue their generous donations. A change in the individual mindset will also take time to accomplish and thus cannot be expected to take effect overnight. Works Cited Singer Peter.
Beck, U. 2000. ‘Living Your Own Life in a Runaway World: Individualisation, globalisation and politics’. In W Hutton and A Giddens (eds). On The Edge: Living with Global Capitalism. London:Vintage. Pp 164-174.
... aid across the world. As we have established that we do have an obligation to redistribute globally in a cosmopolitan perspective, distributing wealth however we may need to rethink what the best assistance is. Amaryta Sen conveys that before sending aid to the third world state, we would need to fully understand the limitation of freedom in the country. Redistributing wealth to global countries requires it to be evaluated by the economic shortage that they are suffering and to see whether it will be efficient in the long run. The more effective ways to contribute would be to international relief agencies or NGO’s that would pursue international development projects to help those in poverty or the alternative option by Tom Campbell’s idea of a ‘Global humanitarian levy’ which suggests a more appropriate taxation on all citizens to collectively aid those in need.
most affected by poverty are the future of this country, the children. “Young children are the
Most charities focus on issues overseas, but there 's issues right here in America that desperately need to be solved. Charity focus could help get less fortunate kids get a good education, and then help get them through college and start a good life and set them up for success. it could also get the homeless citizens into shelter or possibly even employ them and help get their life back on track, rehabilitation programs could also help them clean up their act. Veterans and elders could get the help they need to get insurance, and medical attention with a charity focus, they deserve to be treated equally. A little goes a long way for the less fortunate, what might be pocket money for you, could feed a homeless person that night, so they at least don 't have to be both hungry and cold. If Americans would focus on themselves for awhile a lot of issues could be extinguished in a short amount of time, and don’t underestimate the difference a local effort can do. The World can’t be changed in a short amount of time, but if America could find the money and time to focus on the issues at home, then they could put the focus back overseas to help them with their efforts. Little by little America can work out the kinks and keep heading towards national security on finances and also be able to insure that all of the citizens can make it by too.The world has a bright future, but before the
The United States is one of the leading suppliers of Foreign Aid in the world, and even though the US gives billions, European countries give aid money to the same countries, this causes many areas of the Middle East, Africa, and Asia to be almost fully dependent on foreign aid. This means that without aid from other countries, they would not be able to support themselves at all. Foreign aid is meant to help countries that are struggling with civil unrest, disease, or natural disasters, it is not meant to help keep the country out of debt, but that is where more and more of the US and The EU’s foreign aid budget is going. The question is, does all this money actually go where it is intended? It should be going towards the government and to help the people, but in many cases, the countries government does not have the resources to properly track the flow of money. The countries in most cases have poor infrastructure and corrupt or oppressive leaders, not always at a national level, but in the towns and cities. So this means there is almost no way to oversee the flow of foreign aid through the country, all we can see is that their situations aren't getting any better and the countries are still impoverished. If this is the case, where are the millions of dollars going? Countries like Afghanistan and Iraq receive the most money from American foreign aid and European aid, yet they are still under oppressive governmental rule and there is still an extreme difference between the rich and poor. Garrett Harding’s theory of “Lifeboat Ethics” exemplifies how not giving aid to others will allow the strongest of society to thrive, while teaching the impoverished to help themselves. He believes that giving aid to poor countries will only make ...
Throughout history, the British have been a nation of sailors and businessmen. With the dawn of the imperial era, money began to equal power, and the wealth of the British elevated them to the top of the world. As Sir Walter Raleigh said,
With the turn of the 20th century, the English grew more distant from their connection to English land and nature and focused their efforts on production, industrialization, and capitalism. Country houses were frequently shut up, while London estates were torn down to make room for condos and new industry. This loss of estate changed English sensibility towards an industrious future, leaving the traditional old England behind. These changes are analyzed in E.M. Forster’s Howards End with a focus on inheritance. Who will inherit England? Will the new generation preserve English identity or destroy it?
James Wolfensohn had admitted as the new head of the World Bank that they had made a big mistake in Africa and their policies had created even a bigger gap between the rich and the poor as well as a serious crisis where their total debt almost equaled the annual gross national product of the entire continent. As a result, 25 percent of their children were dying before the age of 5 due to the lack of health aid (Wild & Wild, 2016. pp. 273).
Currently, Britain has the second largest economy in Europe, trailing behind Germany. Therefore, we have an incredible amount of influence not only in Europe but across the planet! If Britain leaves, many experts strongly believe that other countries may also consider their departure. In consequence, Britain’s choice to leave would result in an unstable Europe. As members of a union whose prominence around the world is massive, a certain amount of influence falls upon the shoulders of Britain.
But they don’t help answer the question, “if one in three children live in poverty in Britain, where are they all?” (Harker). The U.K is known to be one of the wealthiest and most beautiful countries in the world, so poverty does not come to mind. Harker also mentions, “Anti-poverty campaigners face the challenge of opening our eyes to the very real difficulties that millions face just getting by in modern Britain.
While images of starving orphans may touch the hearts of wealthy westerners, those same images may be deceiving the viewers to achieve higher donation rates. The cash is then distributed in a way that the organizations see fit. The donor learns nothing about the political and economical structure in the third world country that they have “supported,” and they continue about their day with no knowledge of where their money actually ended up. There is a lack of education, and as a result the financial gap between the rich and the poor continues to increase.
The debate about British Identity has been prominently featured in recent years as a public concern. The foundation of British Identity was based on the act of union in 1801 between England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland that created Great Britain. Heath and Roberts describe this identity as “a relatively recent construct and was gradually superimposed on earlier national identities of English, Welsh, Scottish and Irish” (2008:4). The four nations were unified mainly because of the political and economic project of the British Empire that developed a shared agenda and The Second World War which melted the distinctive differences between the constituent nations (Ward, 2004). According to Colley, the interests that unified the nations do not exist and even if they do” they are less distinctive” (1992). Although there is identification with Britishness, it is noticeable that Britons hold a stronger allegiance to their primary nation. The British Identity is decreasing as many writers suggested, and this is due to many different trends and influences such as globalization, immigration and communication (Heath and Roberts, 2008). This essay highlights some of the reasons of the decline in the British national identity and the rise of the consentient nation’s sentiment. This is approached by firstly considering the internal factors of the devolution of power to Scotland and Wales, and secondly the external factor of immigration and will analyze the relationship between age and identification with a nation.
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (London: 2005). pp. 51, 71-72. Accessed May 3, 2014. http://www.jhud.co.uk/huddleston/uk2005_tcm77-248610.pdf.