Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Punishment in contemporary society
Punishment in contemporary society
Punishment in contemporary society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Punishment in contemporary society
If a single ticket took your entire life away, how would you feel? Would you be angry or maybe you’d be crying your life away? Either way, imagine having a ticket that’s $240 dollars that after 5 months turns into $800 maybe even a $1,000-dollar ticket. Believe it or not, but this is something that happens almost every day to any random person. Our lives as we know it may controlled by a simple ticket. With this in mind, I want to discuss how corrections systems, crime, sanctions, social order, explicit rules and even impersonality plays into effect when a ticket is given to someone who’s “broken” a law.
To start off with what a corrections system is, it’s basically like probation. You are watched and expected to meet up to the standards of whatever you’ve been convicted of; in this case you’re meeting you ticket payments. As explained in John Oliver’s, Municipal Violations rant, people with tickets are put on probation, and even given
…show more content…
In Tom Barret’s case, he ended up in jail three times for stealing a $2 dollar can of beer, and not paying the ticket for his action on time. As outrageous as it may seem, to the court that’s a very serious offense. Meaning that his actions were most likely labeled under “violent crime”, which would mean he’d have to be “using force” or “proposing some kind of threat”. Which he wasn’t, but obviously it was so serious that he had to be arrested multiple times for it. Like Tom Barret’s incident, Harriet Cleveland lost practically everything due to owing a ticket. In result to that she met social order standards and based her whole life on arranging ways to try and pay off her fine. Which to me is utterly ridiculous because these “explicit rules” do not outline any standards in our bureaucracy. Better yet these rules and sanctions provoke tons of impersonality’s that don’t even consider a person’s situation when tickets are given
The Punishment Imperative, a book based on the transition from a time when punishment was thought to be necessarily harsh to a time where reform in the prion system is needed, explains the reasons why the grand social experiment of severe punishment did not work. The authors of the book, Todd R. Clear and Natasha A. Frost, strongly argue that the previous mindset of harsh punishment has been replaced due to political shifts, firsthand evidence, and spending issues within the government. Clear and Frost successfully assert their argument throughout the book using quantitative and qualitative information spanning from government policies to the reintegration of previous convicts into society.
Plain and simple, fines are defined as an amount of money demanded as a form of charge by a court of law or other source of authority. Fines are given out to act as a way for the offender to “pay back” society and to also ensure they show up to where they need to show up at. , such as trial. The deciders of the fine and distributer of it comes down to the court, whether it be federal or state. One of the benefits of fines, as previously mentioned, is the assurance that the offender will show up to their case. Another would be it’s presence as a deterrent, because no one wants to willingly give up money for making a wrong decision. An important factor to also mention about fines is their ability to vary in amount based on the crime, which allows it to be a very malleable and widely used as a form of
Criminal law attempts to balance the rights of individuals to freedom from interference with person or property, and society’s need for order. Procedural matters, the rights of citizens and powers of the state, specific offences and defences, and punishment and compensation are some of the ways society and the criminal justice system interact.
than pay the fine. Waiting in the courtroom to see the judge can be very close. to a death sentence of a person. The wait is long, and the company can be frightening. Once you plead your case, you generally end up paying the fine.
The collateral consequences of criminal convictions rather than the direct result are known as “invisible punishments”. In his article “Invisible Punishment”, Travis discusses the unintended consequences that punishes an individual beyond the formal sentence. Criminals are not only punished once for their crimes, they are punished twice, and these invisible punishments follow them throughout their lifetime. Travis explains that these punishments are a form of “Social exclusion”, not purposely designed but merely due to operation of law.
Society has long since operated on a system of reward and punishment. That is, when good deeds are done or a person behaves in a desired way they SP are rewarded, or conversely punished when behaviour does not meet the societal norms. Those who defy these norms and commit crime are often punished by organized governmental justice systems through the use of penitentiaries, where prisoners carry out their sentences. The main goals of sentencing include deterrence, safety of the public, retribution, rehabilitation, punishment and respect for the law (Government of Canada, 2013). However, the type of justice system in place within a state or country greatly influences the aims and mandates of prisons and in turn targets different aspects of sentencing goals. Justice systems commonly focus on either rehabilitative or retributive measures.
However, people start to flip out when they get huge fines or even jail time. Furthermore the amount is so excessive you would have be a millionaire! Not everyone has a spare six hundred seventy five thousand dollars laying around. Unfortunately Joel Tenenbaum is out of options. A Massachusetts district court judge ruled the $675,00 fine levied against him is an appropriate amount and refuses to call for a new trial. For each song he would have to pay, twenty one thousand, seven hundred and seventy four dollars. Not to many people have that much spare money sitting around. If someone was that rich they could pay for the songs themselves. Many will argue that this is an excessive amount. For a more effective deterrent would charging the offender 100 dollars. It makes alot more sence then charging someone thousands of dollars. In reality no one can afford that.
Corrections are a necessary tool to protect society from those who do harm to others or to others property. Depending on the type of crime that was committed, and if the crime is considered a state or federal charge, also depends on where the person sentenced will do his time. There are four main sentencing options available; prison, probation, probation and confinement, and prison and community split. When a person is sentenced to do their time in prison most likely they will go to a state or federal prison. If a person is ordered probation, it prevents them from going to jail but they have stipulations on their probation. This is called intermediate sanctions, which are the various new correctional options used as adjuncts to and part of probation. Some intermediate sanctions include restitution, fines, day fines, community service, intensive supervised probation, house arrest, electronic monitoring, and shock incarceration.
In 2009 Chimamanda Adichie gave a TED talk about the ‘danger of a single story’. A single story meaning, one thought or one example of a person becoming what we think about all people that fit that description, a stereotype if you will. In today’s America, I believe that we have all felt the wave of stereotypical views at some point or another. Adichie gives many relatable examples throughout her life of how she has been affected by the single story. Her story brings about an issue that all humans, from every inch of the earth, have come to understand on some level. A young child reading only foreign books, a domestic helper that she only perceived as poor. Her college roommates single story about Africans and her own formation of a single
Corrections have been in used throughout the centuries in many lands and countries. It is for the punishment and treatment of individuals who have committed crimes against others. The correctional side of the criminal justice system is just one part of a greater whole. Correctional officers have one of the hardest and most dangerous jobs with having a number of responsibilities. Correctional officers are the peace keepers of the prisons and institutions that hold large numbers of convicted criminals. What is to say that all officials of these institutions adhere to the firm rules and regulations of the prisons? There have been many cases where officers of corrections have gone beyond the scope of duty to break moral codes and have been faced with ethical dilemmas. It all comes down the de...
The United States criminal justice system is an ever-changing system that is based on the opinions and ideas of the public. Many of the policies today were established in direct response to polarizing events and generational shifts in ideology. In order to maintain public safety and punish those who break these laws, law enforcement officers arrest offenders and a judge or a group of the law offender’s peers judge their innocence. If found guilty, these individuals are sentenced for a predetermined amount of time in prison and are eventually, evaluated for early release through probation. While on probation, the individual is reintegrated into their community, with restrict limitations that are established for safety.
Every civilization in history has had rules, and citizens who break them. To this day governments struggle to figure out the best way to deal with their criminals in ways that help both society and those that commit the crimes. Imprisonment has historically been the popular solution. However, there are many instances in which people are sent to prison that would be better served for community service, rehab, or some other form of punishment. Prison affects more than just the prisoner; the families, friends, employers, and communities of the incarcerated also pay a price. Prison as a punishment has its pros and cons; although it may be necessary for some, it can be harmful for those who would be better suited for alternative means of punishment.
The criminal justice system is composed of three parts – Police, Courts and Corrections – and all three work together to protect an individual’s rights and the rights of society to live without fear of being a victim of crime. According to merriam-webster.com, crime is defined as “an act that is forbidden or omission of a duty that is commanded by public law and that makes the offender liable to punishment by that law.” When all the three parts work together, it makes the criminal justice system function like a well tuned machine.
The correctional system punishes offenders by sentencing them to serve time in jail or prison. Others forms of punishment include being sentenced to probation, community service, and/or restitution. Jail is a locally operated short-term confinement facilities originally built to hold suspects following arrest and pending trial (Schmalleger, 2009). A prison is state or ...
In breaking the law, this approach views this as an undue advantage over the security of society and, as such, punishment is condoned in order to ensure that all citizens are equally benefiting from the state. Thus, the individual deserves to be punished in order to restore the balance of benefits and burdens. However, here arises a similar aforementioned point of critique. Are there no other ways to redress this balance? Given the vast amount of resources needed to sustain an institution of punishment, would a distribution or supplement of benefits for law-abiders be sufficient for this model?