Brave New World Rhetorical Analysis

725 Words2 Pages

It can be argued that knowing the truth is vital in unfortunate circumstances that would only bring unease and despair. In the novel Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, citizens are constantly sheltered from anything that would bring unhappiness. Society feels that people should be unaware of how horrible life is. There is even a drug Soma that is designed to bring pleasure to its users and cause joyous hallucinations. Huxley writes with a satirical tone throughout the novel, but overdramatizing can often times be effective to point out certain flaws in society. During the 1920’s and 1930’s, there were multiple concerns for the changing of traditional values. Some of which include advancements in technology leading to a loss of individuality, …show more content…

Because of this he was not made in a lab, designed for whatever attributions he would have for society. This greatly differentiated John from any of the other characters. John having a different background allowed him to resist normal parts of society others were slaves to: Soma and Sex. This shows he expressed a greater understanding of freedom. In John’s conversation that he had with Mustapha Mond, he explained how the ability to be unhappy was essentially having freedom. This showed how technically none of the other citizens had freedom. Freedom was defined as “the power or right to act, speak, or think as one wants without hindrance or restraint”. Because citizens were biologically produced to act and think in a certain manner, their power to act as individuals was restrained, proving they were not free. Huxley does this to explain that advanced technology would take away people’s right to think the way they wanted to, even if that meant negatively. And by not being able to think in a certain way, people would lose their …show more content…

He is secure about himself and is an individual compared to others in society. Even though he can seem individualistic, he still does not have the capacity to understand certain concepts. Because of this he does not know complete freedom either. Because of the way people are bred in society, no one has a father or mother. There is also no love or jealousy in society. When Helmholtz hears the story of Romeo and Juliet he finds it completely hilarious, because he doesn’t understand love or jealousy. This is how Huxley shows that a totalitarian government can control the way of life in its society. This even includes comedy and information that may be easily accessible to a person who is free. A government controlling information is detrimental to the freedom of

Show More
Related

  • Brave New World Rhetorical Analysis

    425 Words  | 1 Pages

    The tone during the whole plot of in Brave New World changes when advancing throughout the plot, but it often contains a dark and satiric aspect. Since the novel was originally planned to be written as a satire, the tone is ironic and sarcastic. Huxley's sarcastic tone is most noticeable in the conversations between characters. For instance, when the director was educating the students about the past history, he states that "most facts about the past do sound incredible (Huxley 45)." Through the exaggeration of words in the statement of the director, Huxley's sarcastic tone obviously is portrayed. As a result of this, the satirical tone puts the mood to be carefree.

    Read More

  • Crazy Brave Rhetorical Analysis

    229 Words  | 1 Pages

    Joy Harjo uses a metaphor throughout the memoir Crazy Brave , in order to express her emotions about how she feels about art, her classmates , and the books she has read .

    Read More

  • Into The Wild Rhetorical Analysis

    1626 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the book Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer wrote about Christopher McCandless, a nature lover in search for independence, in a mysterious and hopeful experience. Even though Krakauer tells us McCandless was going to die from the beginning, he still gave him a chance for survival. As a reader I wanted McCandless to survive. In Into the Wild, Krakauer gave McCandless a unique perspective. He was a smart and unique person that wanted to be completely free from society. Krakauer included comments from people that said McCandless was crazy, and his death was his own mistake. However, Krakauer is able to make him seem like a brave person. The connections between other hikers and himself helped in the explanation of McCandless’s rational actions. Krakauer is able to make McCandless look like a normal person, but unique from this generation. In order for Krakauer to make Christopher McCandless not look like a crazy person, but a special person, I will analyze the persuading style that Krakauer used in Into the Wild that made us believe McCandless was a regular young adult.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Letter From Birmingham Jail

    630 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Letter from Birmingham Jail was written by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in April of 1963. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was one of several civil rights activists who were arrested in Birmingham Alabama, after protesting against racial injustices in Alabama. Dr. King wrote this letter in response to a statement titled A Call for Unity, which was published on Good Friday by eight of his fellow clergymen from Alabama. Dr. King uses his letter to eloquently refute the article. In the letter dr. king uses many vivid logos, ethos, and pathos to get his point across. Dr. King writes things in his letter that if any other person even dared to write the people would consider them crazy.

    Read More

  • Societal Drug Use in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World

    665 Words  | 2 Pages

    Huxley’s portrayed society does in fact work to an extent. People know what they need to do, people are happy, people have soma, and people can have pleasure whenever they like. Things get done, but those same things could get done in a different way. The introduction of the Savage starts to show a different side of the story. The Savage, not conditioned and born to an actual mother, has different ideas about society- especially soma. “Listen, I beg of you. Lend me your ears… Don’t take that horrible stuff. It’s poison, it’s poison.”

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis

    929 Words  | 2 Pages

    Pollan’s article provides a solid base to the conversation, defining what to do in order to eat healthy. Holding this concept of eating healthy, Joe Pinsker in “Why So Many Rich Kids Come to Enjoy the Taste of Healthier Foods” enters into the conversation and questions the connection of difference in families’ income and how healthy children eat (129-132). He argues that how much families earn largely affect how healthy children eat — income is one of the most important factors preventing people from eating healthy (129-132). In his article, Pinsker utilizes a study done by Caitlin Daniel to illustrate that level of income does affect children’s diet (130). In Daniel’s research, among 75 Boston-area parents, those rich families value children’s healthy diet more than food wasted when children refused to accept those healthier but

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis

    1502 Words  | 4 Pages

    In a quote by John Mill, “Does fining a criminal show want of respect for property, or imprisoning him, for personal freedom? Just as unreasonable is it to think that to take the life of a man who has taken that of another is to show want of regard for human life. We show, on the contrary, most emphatically our regard for it, by the adoption of a rule that he who violates that right in another forfeits it for himself, and that while no other crime that he can commit deprives him of his right to live, this shall.” Everyone’s life is precious, but at what price? Is it okay to let a murderer to do as they please? Reader, please take a moment and reflect on this issue. The issue will always be a conflict of beliefs and moral standards. The topic

    Read More

  • The Social And Political Attitudes Of Brave New World

    1360 Words  | 3 Pages

    Brave New World is an unsettling, loveless and even sinister place. This is because Huxley endows his "ideal" society with features calculated to alienate his audience. Typically, reading Brave New World elicits the very same disturbing feelings in the reader which the society it depicts has notionally vanquished - not a sense of joyful anticipation. Huxley's novel presents a startling view of the future which on the surface appears almost comical. His intent, however, is not humor. Huxley's message is dark and depressing. His idea that in centuries to come, a one-world government will rise to power, stripping people's freedom, is not a new idea. What makes Huxley's interpretation different is the fact that his fictional society not only lives in a totalitarian government, but takes an embracive approach like mindless robots. For example, Soma, not nuclear bombs, is the weapon of choice for the World Controllers in Brave New World. The world leaders have realized that fear and intimidation have only limited power; these tactics simply build up resentment in the minds of the oppressed. Subconscious persuasion and mind-altering drugs, on the other hand, appear to have no side effects.

    Read More

  • Brave New World by Aldous Huxley

    1229 Words  | 3 Pages

    Brave New World, a novel by Aldous Huxley was written at a tine in history when war had ravaged much of the nation, Depression was blanketing society, and people’s wills were being put to the test. Science had become an overwhelming force for better or for worse. People had witnessed science saving and preventing millions of lives with vaccinations and such, but on the contrary, had also witnessed it kill with horrifying “factory-like” efficiency in WW I (the age of machine guns and chemical warfare). Brave New World is not intended to be a happy book, it is more Huxley’s way of describing what he believes is coming to us. He is basically saying, “This is our future”. Huxley’s writings are known for dealing with conflicts between the interest of the individual and the interests of society. Brave New World addresses this conflict in a fictional future (approximately 500 years into the future) in which free will and individuality have been sacrificed to achieve complete social stability.

    Read More

  • Comparison Of Drugs In Brave New World By Aldous Huxley

    1163 Words  | 3 Pages

    Many individuals wonder about whether using artificial pathways to happiness, through drugs, yields more positive or negative results for society. People enjoy the fact that they can easily escape from their stress by using these drugs. However, these drugs also can lead to terrible consequences, such as becoming more oblivious to reality or overdosing. In the novel Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, Huxley criticizes society’s reliance on drugs to provide citizens with artificial happiness. By writing about soma, a made-up drug that the government distributes in order to ensure that their citizens remain happy, Huxley implies that the allowance of similar drugs can lead individuals to become dependent on them and fine with their lack of freedom,

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis

    854 Words  | 2 Pages

    Jonathan Kozol revealed the early period’s situation of education in American schools in his article Savage Inequalities. It seems like during that period, the inequality existed everywhere and no one had the ability to change it; however, Kozol tried his best to turn around this situation and keep track of all he saw. In the article, he used rhetorical strategies effectively to describe what he saw in that situation, such as pathos, logos and ethos.

    Read More

  • Individuality Vs. Social Stability

    1330 Words  | 3 Pages

    Imagine living in a society where there is no sense of independence, individual thought or freedom. A society where the government uses disturbing methods that dehumanize people in order to force conformity upon them. Taking away any sense of emotion, It would be very undesirable to live in a society with such oppression. Such society is portrayed in Aldous Huxley's novel Brave New World. The World State uses social restrictions to create permanent artificial personalities for people within the society. The World State also uses controlled groupings of people to brainwash them further to be thoughtless people with no sense of individualism. Lastly, the World State uses drugs to create artificial happiness for people, leaving no room for intense emotion which causes people to revolt against the World State. Within the novel Brave New World, it is seen that the World State eliminates individuality through social restrictions, government controlled groupings and the abuse of drugs to maintain control of the population.

    Read More

  • A Superficial Society In Aldous Huxley's Brave New World

    2120 Words  | 5 Pages

    In the novel Brave New World, Aldous Huxley portrays a superficial society where people give up their authentic humanity in order to feel artificial happiness. Most people conform to society because they need and want acceptance of others, turning conformity, into society’s new drug. The cookie cutter theory within the novel is as strong and alive in today’s society as it has ever been.

    Read More

  • Conformity In Brave New World

    891 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Brave New World, Huxley emphasizes that conformity compromises humanity through the elimination of knowledge and history to eradicate curiosity. Knowledge and history are irrelevant concepts within this society, as it is believed that they lead to curiosity which creates the possibility of change, an exiled idea in this world. Huxley explores the concept that by conforming to society’s rules and regulations it compromises humanity’s individual perspectives and rights to knowledge and history. In the novel, the idea that people are conditioned to believe and understand what they have been taught and not to question the possibilities due to the lack of knowledge is explored. The people in this society are taught what they need to know to succeed

    Read More

  • Humanity in Brave New World

    1345 Words  | 3 Pages

    For years, authors and philosophers have satirized the “perfect” society to incite change. In Brave New World, Aldous Huxley describes a so-called utopian society in which everyone is happy. This society is a “controlled environment where technology has essentially [expunged] suffering” (“Brave New World”). A member of this society never needs to be inconvenienced by emotion, “And if anything should go wrong, there's soma” (Huxley 220). Citizens spend their lives sleeping with as many people as they please, taking soma to dull any unpleasant thoughts that arise, and happily working in the jobs they were conditioned to want. They are genetically altered and conditioned to be averse to socially destructive things, like nature and families. They are trained to enjoy things that are socially beneficial: “'That is the secret of happiness and virtue – liking what you've got to do. All conditioning aims at that: making people like their inescapable social destiny'” (Huxley 16). Citizens operate more like machinery, and less like humans. Humanity is defined as “the quality of being human” (“Humanity”). To some, humanity refers to the aspects that define a human: love, compassion and emotions. Huxley satirizes humanity by dehumanizing the citizens in the Brave New World society.

    Read More

More about Brave New World Rhetorical Analysis

Open Document