As a whole, science fiction utilises mise-en-scene to establish many SF codes and conventions (as mentioned above). As seen in Blade Runner, the most significant elements of mise-en-scene that help construct SF codes and conventions include the use of cinematography, lighting, editing, music, props and costumes. Blade Runner is incredibly unique for it is the first SF film to contain film noir and be categorised as cyberpunk; a subgenre of SF that showcases advanced technology in an urban, dystopian future (Callaghan 2017). As such, Blade Runner has established numerous codes and conventions for later cyberpunk films (E.g. 1984’s The Terminator). In one scene in Blade Runner, inside of a meeting room in a Tyrell Corporate building, the protagonist, …show more content…
a typical noir-styled detective called Rick Deckard, is using the fictional Voight Kamff machine on Rachel, a love interest, to see if she is a replicant (genetically engineered humanoid). The use of darkness and shadows, as well as light coming in from behind a blind, manages to recreate a strong noir feel that portrays gloom and sadness to audiences. In this scene several symbolic motifs are present, such as smoke, eyes and artificial animals.
Rachel’s cigarette smoke in each shot expresses confusion and paranoia. The eye test, Rachel’s highlighted pupils (an eerie illusion created by reflecting light), and Dr. Tyrell’s highlighted glasses also give a sense of paranoia and that someone is always watching. This manages to grip audiences by building suspense. The artificial owl in the background represents the consequences of humanity’s advancements and that mistakes – loss – cannot be fixed. The lack of unconventional electronic music (found throughout the film) and use of close-ups, blurred backgrounds and slow paced editing in this scene further stress the unusual, gloomy atmosphere and highlight the importance of the subject and their dialogue. Once again, suspense is built. Another shot, which is wide, subtly captures the hugeness of the futuristic polluted LA city in the background that is illuminated only by artificial light. By combining these codes it becomes evident that Blade Runner powerfully portrays a corrupt, distorted and morally lacking society that makes audiences question the ethics and risks of technology and what it means to be …show more content…
human. Typically, when an audience goes to see a SF film, they can expect to see the use of, for example, certain cinematography, editing, music, costumes and props to drive forward the many codes and conventions of SF. By analysing the mise-en-scene used in Lucy it becomes apparent that this film, compared to Blade Runner, is quite different for it relies on many alternative – and more traditionally recent – SF codes and conventions. Some of these conventions include certain philosophical ideas, the use of special visual effects and Lucy’s transcendence (e.g. telekinesis and clairvoyance). An example is the final scene where Lucy, seated in a chair in a science lab, suddenly teleports through time and space after she unlocks 90% of her brain’s mental capacity. Each beautiful location Lucy travels to is vibrant in colour and contrasts greatly with her black dress that symbolises the dark matter and super computer she is becoming, and the emotionless being she has become. By using green screening, special visual effects, moderately paced editing, Lucy’s time travel montage appears both immensely realistic, artistic and dramatic. Classical music further heightens this beautiful, tense build up. Several of the shots throughout the time travel montage are either wide shots or close ups of Lucy’s face. This allows audiences to effectively see the world from Lucy’s point of view, and as such it becomes clear that lack of character development and plot throughout (much like Blade Runner) is a means to focus more so on philosophical ideas. Lucy’s message of what it means to exist and be human supersedes the film’s central false theme that humans use 10% of their brain. These codes and conventions are what makes Lucy the unique SF film it is. Like any other genre, science fiction has been heavily influenced by audiences and the social context they are part of.
With countless inventions throughout the 20th century, audiences had a strong interest in technology and the amazing unpredictable future they present. On the other hand, technology, particularly after society witnessed the effects of WMD’s (weapons of mass destruction) in the World Wars, sparked fear and ethical concerns regarding technological abuse (The Levine Institute 2017). As such, in a society filled with innovative technology like televisions, SF filmmakers have been able to take advantage of these widespread worries and wonders and explore captivating themes in a fictional world free of racial, religious and political boundaries. Both Blade Runner and Lucy play on the concerns of audiences and portray a dysfunctional society dominated by dehumanising consumerism and technology. SF, which is viewed as a male-dominated genre, has also been heavily influenced by gender roles during the Golden Age of Science Fiction (1935-1956); a dry period following the World Wars that saw SF increase in popularity (Dirks 2017; Lilly Library 2010). During this time, females were seen as delicate housewives and were not encouraged to pursue science and maths, thus appearing uneducated in these areas (Coob 2005). Men, however, were strongly seen as science, mathematics and machinery lovers (Brewer 2017). As such, SF became a genre for male readers and male writers,
and saw films such as Man Made Monster (1941) which is portrayed through a male point of view. As a whole, SF has been influenced by audiences for in order to be successful they must incorporate contemporary social perspectives and trending themes. When viewing SF films with a modern perspective several aspects become apparent. In the 20st century, revolutionary special effects in films such as Star Wars – with its miniature Star Destroyer and computer controlled motion photography - now appear quite basic compared to the groundbreaking use of CGI technology in the 21st century (Hart 2011). Films like Avatar (2009) and, of course, Lucy make extensive use of groundbreaking effects. Audiences too have evolved alongside technology, becoming more sophisticated and aware of what they are interpreting from the screen. At the time of Blade Runner’s release, audiences misunderstood the film and were unable to appreciate its innovative ideas and visuals that were ahead of its time. Despite this, a cult following grew and nowadays, with a more sophisticated audience, the film’s value has finally been appreciated and is now, as a result, being preserved in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress (Skaar 2017). On the other hand, Lucy, despite its remarkable special effects and visuals, has received harsh criticism from today’s sophisticated audiences due to a skeptical plot revolving around the debunked myth that humans use 10% of their brain. SF films from both eras, however, still explore similar themes such as technology and humanity. Another aspect apparent in 21st century films is that due to a society with increasing values in gender and racial equality, SF films are starting to expand beyond just white (especially male) characters and are including more, for example, female and African-American lead roles (Maloney 2014). Two films that demonstrate this are, respectively, Interstellar (2014) and After Earth (2013). Overall, it is clear that SF films in the 21st century, compared to the 20th century, are being created with better technology, are receiving more criticism from increasingly aware audiences, and are part of an increasingly more equal film industry. Unlike other genres, science fiction has the incredible power to unite everyone in a world. As seen in Blade Runner and Lucy, SF films inspire a community of thinkers, enthusiasts and creatives from all sorts of backgrounds to ponder on philosophical ideas free of restrictions. Also, by juxtaposing Blade Runner and Lucy it is blatantly clear that, although SF films have transformed with changing times, several core themes such as technology and humanity remain at heart. It is only by understanding how the SF genre has been shaped by history, codes and conventions, audiences and a modern perspective can a successful SF film effectively challenge, for example, where humans are headed in a constantly changing world. As a whole, science fiction, as Theodore Sturgeon so eloquently phrases, is a magnificent genre that simply “ask[s] the next question.”
Literature and film have always held a strange relationship with the idea of technological progress. On one hand, with the advent of the printing press and the refinements of motion picture technology that are continuing to this day, both literature and film owe a great deal of their success to the technological advancements that bring them to widespread audiences. Yet certain films and works of literature have also never shied away from portraying the dangers that a lust for such progress can bring with it. The modern output of science-fiction novels and films found its genesis in speculative ponderings on the effect such progress could hold for the every day population, and just as often as not those speculations were damning. Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein and Fritz Lang's silent film Metropolis are two such works that hold great importance in the overall canon of science-fiction in that they are both seen as the first of their kind. It is often said that Mary Shelley, with her authorship of Frankenstein, gave birth to the science-fiction novel, breathing it into life as Frankenstein does his monster, and Lang's Metropolis is certainly a candidate for the first genuine science-fiction film (though a case can be made for Georges Méliès' 1902 film Le Voyage Dans la Lune, his film was barely fifteen minutes long whereas Lang's film, with its near three-hour original length and its blending of both ideas and stunning visuals, is much closer to what we now consider a modern science-fiction film). Yet though both works are separated by the medium with which they're presented, not to mention a period of over two-hundred years between their respective releases, they present a shared warning about the dangers that man's need fo...
In Bladerunner the most prominent element of cinematography is mise en scéne. It generates a context for the film and therefore makes the plot and themes acceptable. To set an appropriate scene different variables need to be controlled. These variables include location, props, lighting and colour. In general the location of the plot is in the vast urban canyons of 2019 LA. The imposing dark buildings, the dirty fog, perpetual rain and the crowded dark streets devoid of vegetation make up the backdrop of most scenes. All this is filmed in dark lighting, which complements the effect produced by the fog in obscuring the living details. From this the responder acknowledges the deterioration of society, the harsh conditions that the humans are subjected to and the way the human spirit itself is progressively destroyed under such conditions.
Since the Director's Cut, Blade Runner seems to have had a phoenix-like resurgence. Just as the simulated humans, or replicants, become more than the sum of their parts as they develop "humanity", so the film has become more than the sum of its parts as interaction - among critics and fans as well as scriptwriters, actors and film crew - contributes to ways of seeing. Scott describes depth in film as like a seven hundred-layer cake.5 Ideas presented in these layers can expand and deepen in the viewer's mind. The viewer's eye becomes as important for the ongoing life of the film as the eyes on which the camera focuses in Blade Runner.6
With the release of JJ Abrams’ Star Wars Episode VII: The Force Awakens in late 2016 recording a staggering domestic gross of over $936 million (Box Office Mojo 2016), the Star Wars series continues to be one of the biggest pop culture icons of the 21st century. However, for a film targeted towards all ages and demographics, with women making up 52% of all movie goers in North America (Motion Picture Association of America **), there is a startling lack of female representation within the series. Furthermore, with the growing prevalence of media in our daily lives combined with media’s role in the development of beliefs and ideas in its viewers, the messages delivered by mass media texts are partly responsible for the for the
Today’s culture sees a gap between the male and female gender. This is evident in everything from the films we watch, music we listen to, and even in our everyday lives. Historically, this issue has seen an even larger gap, and can be observed in the films that were made during that time. Vertigo and Citizen Kane both show the objectification of women by controlling them, writing them in supportive roles, and placing their value in the way that they look.
In this essay I will discuss the way in which the generic marker ‘The visual surface of Science Fiction presents us with a confrontation between those images to which we respond as “alien” and those we know to be familiar’ can be applied to Blade Runner and to what end.
In the classical Western and Noir films, narrative is driven by the action of a male protagonist towards a clearly defined, relatable goal. Any lack of motivation or action on the part of the protagonist problematizes the classical association between masculinity and action. Due to inherent genre expectations, this crisis of action is equivalent to a crisis of masculinity. Because these genres are structured around male action, the crises of action and masculinity impose a crisis of genre. In the absence of traditional narrative elements and character tropes, these films can only identify as members of their genres through saturation with otherwise empty genre symbols. The equivalency between the crises of genre and masculinity frames this symbol saturation as a sort of compensatory masculine posturing.
The film Blade Runner (1982) directed by Ridley Scott depicts women in a negative connotation. Blade Runner is considered a popular science fiction film and is seen to have shaped the genre, however, the film displays women as sex symbols and secondary characters, who are unimportant to the storyline. The film is centered around strong male leads who use their authority and power to abuse, belittle and sexualize women. The film’s misogynistic point of view gives the impression to the audience that this treatment of women is acceptable, which is offensive and completely inaccurate.
These movies allowed female characters to embody all the contradictions that could make them a woman. They were portrayed as the “femme fatale” and also “mother,” the “seductress” and at the same time the “saint,” (Newsom, 2011). Female characters were multi-faceted during this time and had much more complexity and interesting qualities than in the movies we watch today. Today, only 16% of protagonists in movies are female, and the portrayal of these women is one of sexualization and dependence rather than complexity (Newsom, 2011).
In the thirty years since its release, Alien has become a film of various debates amongst film theorists. Academic analyses of the film draw attention to many differing themes, most popularly with feminism. Most critiques, academic and otherwise, ultimately conclude that Alien is a feminist film because of its representation of the workplace as a home to equality and a place where traditional gender roles have been obliterated. What is ultimately revealed by Alien is the anxiety of men during the era of second-wave feminism in which the film was produced. This film provides a step forward for feminists, but imagines men taking two steps back in equality.
Science fiction writing began in the early 1800’s as a reaction to the growth of science and technology. The genre is characterized by its intellectual excitement, high adventure, and its making of the fantastic possible. Due to the nature of science fiction, film has become an essential part of its popularity. Science fiction films have been popular since the earliest silent clips because of the outlandish visuals and creative fictional story lines that capture an audience’s attention. Under the guise of this popular platform, writers relay political, social and philosophical messages to their audience.
Of all the 1980’s films, that can be described as “Eighties Teen Movies” (Thorburn, 1998) or “High School Movies” (Messner, 1998), those written and (with the exception of “Pretty In Pink” (1986) and “Some Kind of Wonderful”(1987)) directed by John Hughes were often seen to define the genre, even leading to the tag “John Hughes rites de passage movies” as a genre definition used in 1990s popular culture (such as in “Wayne’s World 2” (1994 dir. Stephen Surjik)). This term refers to the half dozen films made between 1984 and 1987; chronologically, “Sixteen Candles” (1984), “The Breakfast Club” (1985), “Weird Science” (1985), “Ferris Bueller's Day Off” (1986), “Pretty In Pink” (1986) and “Some Kind Of Wonderful” (1987) (the latter two being directed by Howard Deutch). For the purpose of this study, “Weird Science” and “Some Kind of Wonderful” shall be excluded; “Weird Science” since, unlike the other films, it is grounded in science fiction rather than reality and “Some Kind of Wonderful” as its characters are fractionally older and have lost the “innocence” key to the previous movies: as Bernstein states “the youthful naivete was missing and the diamond earring motif [a significant gift within the film] was no substitute” (Bernstein, 1997, p.89). Bernstein suggests that the decadent 1980s were like the 1950s, “an AIDS-free adventure playground with the promise of prosperity around every corner … our last age of innocence” (Bernstein, 1997, p.1). The films were very much a product of the time in terms of their production (“suddenly adolescent spending power dictated that Hollywood direct all its energies to fleshing out the fantasies of our friend, Mr. Dumb Horny 14 Year Old” Bernstein, 1997, p.4), their repetition (with the growth of video cassette recorders, cable and satellite with time to fill, and also the likes of MTV promoting the film’s soundtracks) and their ideologies.
From the silent epic of Fritz Lang Metropolis (1927) to Ridley’s Scott’s spectacular Blade Runner (1982) the connection between architecture and film has always been intimate. The most apparent concepts that connect these two films are the overall visuals of both films and their vision of city of the future. The futuristic city of both Scott and Lang are distinct in their landscapes, geography, and social structure. These two films sought to envision a future where technology was the basis by which society functioned. Technology was the culture and the cities would crumble without it (Will Brooker). Metropolis and Blade Runner uses the themes relationships among female sexuality and male vision, and technology. However, Gender roles and technology seems to be the most important part in both films.
Film scholar and gender theorist Linda Williams begins her article “Film Bodies: Genre, Gender and Excess,” with an anecdote about a dispute between herself and her son, regarding what is considered “gross,” (727) in films. It is this anecdote that invites her readers to understand the motivations and implications of films that fall under the category of “body” genre, namely, horror films, melodramas, (henceforth referred to as “weepies”) and pornography. Williams explains that, in regards to excess, the constant attempts at “determining where to draw the line,” (727) has inspired her and other theorists alike to question the inspirations, motivations, and implications of these “body genre” films. After her own research and consideration, Williams explains that she believes there is “value in thinking about the form, function, and system of seemingly gratuitous excesses in these three genres,” (728) and she will attempt to prove that these films are excessive on purpose, in order to inspire a collective physical effect on the audience that cannot be experienced when watching other genres.
Feminism is a movement that supports women equality within society. In relation to film, feminism is what pushes the equal representation of females in mainstream films. Laura Mulvey is a feminist theorist that is famous for touching on this particular issue of how men and women are represented in movies. Through her studies, she discovered that many films were portraying men and women very differently from reality. She came up with a theory that best described why there is such as huge misrepresentation of the social status quos of male and female characters. She believed that mainstream film is used to maintain the status quo and prevent the realization of gender equality. This is why films are continuously following the old tradition that males are dominant and females are submissive. This is the ideology that is always present when we watch a movie. This is evident in the films from the past but also currently. It is as if the film industry is still catering to the male viewers of each generation in the same way. Laura Mulvey points out that women are constantly being seen as sexual objects, whether it is the outfits they wear or do not wear or the way they behave, or secondary characters with no symbolic cause. She states that, “in traditional exhibitionist role women are simultaneously looked at and displayed, with their appearance coded for strong visual and erotic impact so that they can be said to connote it-be-looked-at-ness.”(Mulvey pg. 715). Thus, women are nevertheless displayed as nothing more than passive objects for the viewing pleasure of the audience. Mulvey also points out through her research that in every mainstream movie, there is ...