Birkenfeld Case

331 Words1 Page

1. Birkenfeld was adamant that his prison sentence was unfair when compared to the fact that no one else (e.g., Olenicoff or UBS bankers) went to jail. Did he have a point? He should have thought before he acted you cannot pick and choose the things you want to disclose. Life is not fair and it’s especially not for criminals. This is a tuff question because no he did not have a point but in retrospect if you lock up every individual who chooses to report a crime then no one will report it. He got off pretty well if you ask me, he did receive 104 million.

2. Why did UBS elect to settle with the U.S. government? I think they did a risk assessment and said well give them what we were caught for so they will not dig deeper. UBS also had American operations and did not want to have any further complications. …show more content…

Given that there was an immunity agreement in place, what did the Department of Justice gain from prosecuting Birkenfeld? The department of justice received two thing’s, “Justice its self” they also had the opportunity to make an exampling of a whistler blower who tried to hide some of his relationships and involvement.

4. Critics are concerned that even with the large qui tam award, Birkenfeld’s prison sentence will discourage other tax whistle-blowers from coming forward. Is that a valid concern? Why or why not? Yes, it is more then most of the individuals involved enough to know about tax evasion are involved to an extent them selves and would not want to tell knowing the outcome. On the other hand I know there is a lot of individuals who would spend forty months in jail for 104 million dollars.

Interesting topic and good read. In the end did he deserve jail time, yes? Did he deserve 104 million, debatable? Is it a good thing he came forward, yes? Should they have prosecuted him,

Show More
Related

  • Clifford Olson: Canadian Serial Killer

    1018 Words  | 3 Pages

    Olson knew that he was going to be put back in jail and was suspected on some of the other murders that he had committed.. So Olson made a deal with the prosecution. In his deal Olson' s family, (wife and son) were to be paid $10,000 for each of his victims. This was very controversial. In exchange Olson would provide the information on the known murders and gave the police direction to 6 outstanding bodies. Olson kept his part of the deal and so did the prosecution. The money was paid to Olson's family on schedule.

    Read More

  • The Andrew Bedner Case

    165 Words  | 1 Pages

    Story: Andrew Bedner is an American man at the center of bioethical controversy regarding the rights of parents to make medical decisions for children they have allegedly abused

    Read More

  • Reflection On Alonza Thomas Crimes

    503 Words  | 2 Pages

    Watch the attached video and reflect on it in your discussions. What do you think of what Alonza did? What do you think about his sentence? Would you have given a different 'punishment,' if so, what? and why? And anything else you may want to add.

    Read More

  • Gitlow vs New York

    1245 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... his action could actually be really harmful for the society. Gitlow defended him as not guilty merely depends on the part of the context of the First Amendment of Constitution about U.S citizens’ freedom of speech. It is actually make a deliberate misinterpretation out of the context. Gitlow’s claims that he is innocent might because of his less awareness and misunderstanding of the laws. Or, he might believe that the faults of the Constitution would help him escape from the punishment. However, in my point of view, Gitlow fail to consider the primarily goal of the U.S Constitution that is to protect the best profit of its majority.

    Read More

  • Stella Liebeck: Coffee and Frivolity

    1199 Words  | 3 Pages

    The facts of the case are now more readily available thanks to the internet. When the story first broke in 1992 the internet was still in its infancy. Most of the media coverage at the time came from print and television coverage and most of that was not comprehensive at all. The initial jury award of almost 3 million dollars was sensational, grabbing headlines all over the world. Now with the advent of the internet in its modern form the facts are coming out about what actually happened. It turns out that Mrs. Liebeck was actually injured far more seriously than most realize and received far less money than was actua...

    Read More

  • Scopes Trial

    1038 Words  | 3 Pages

    Upon his arrest, the ACLU took full responsibility for all monetary charges incurred during the course of the trial. The defense appointed the country’s greatest ...

    Read More

  • Martha Stewart crimes

    565 Words  | 2 Pages

    On March 5, 2004, Martha Stewart, a successful business woman and the founder of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia was sentenced by the jury to five months in prison at a minimum-security federal prison, another five months of home confinement along with 19 months of probation and $30,00 fine. Stewart was found guilty on four counts in what seemed to be known as white-collar crime. In this paper, I will briefly explain, identify and answer respectively in order on the three topics of, what crime did Martha Stewart commit, what evidence did the jury appear to find most convincing and whether should Stewart have received prison time. I will be using my own ideas along with the researches from reputable and credible sources to support my ideas.

    Read More

  • The Bernie Madoff Ponzi Scheme

    2602 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Bernie Madoff Ponzi Scheme is a well-known case and is known as one of the biggest Ponzi scheme’s. In summary the scheme occurred for many reasons that I will some up into 3 points; A lack in competency by regulatory agencies, a lack of regulation, and finally a breach in ethics by Bernie Madoff himself. To explain further, the regulatory agencies like the lawyers and SEC are supposed to prevent schemes such as this one from happening but because they lacked the skills to correctly assess the situation, interpreting the number of tips they had received regarding scheme that had been filed, and to act on those in an efficient manner. One of the tips was made by Harry Markopolos in 2000, of who correctly predicted that Madoff was guilty of fraud. Even after this tip from Markopolos, Madoff was not arrested until 2009. Many family members were also a part of the fraud along with some non-family members such as Frank DiPascali and a team known as the 17th floor team, who helped Madoff carry out his fraud. The idea behind Madoff’s fraud was that he would produce false statements of their investments and when people wanted to pull out their investments, the money wasn’t actually there, which rightfully rose more than a few eyebrows and ultimately led to his arrest.

    Read More

  • Jordan Belfort Case Study

    3181 Words  | 7 Pages

    Jordan Belfort throughout his entire life subverted the law for his own financial gain, always seeing money as worth the risk in the decisions he made. His decisions were made by a rational mind of his own volition, considering the long-term possibilities and how to stay ahead of his pursuers. He constructed an environment with Stratton Oakmont to enable this behaviour, as well as corrupt those around him to follow in his footsteps. This lead to his repeated violations of laws to generate wealth when his fear of punishment was lower than that of the rewards he could potentially gain. It was only when he was confronted with the reality of his punishment and experienced it directly that he was finally deterred from his criminal behaviour.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Private Prisons

    708 Words  | 2 Pages

    caused major sacrifice but little gain for the public. Private prisons must be better monitored and

    Read More

  • Jordan Belfort: The Wolf of Wall Street

    1357 Words  | 3 Pages

    Jordan Belfort is the notorious 1990’s stockbroker who saw himself earning fifty million dollars a year operating a penny stock boiler room from his Stratton Oakmont, Inc. brokerage firm. Corrupted by drugs, money, and sex he went from being an innocent twenty – two year old on the fringe of a new life to manipulating the system in his infamous “pump and dump” scheme. As a stock swindler, he would motivate his young brokers through insane presentations to rile them up as they defrauded investors with duplicitous stock sales. Toward the end of this debauchery tale he was convicted for securities fraud and money laundering for which he was sentenced to twenty – two months in prison as well as recompensing two – hundred million in restitution to any swindled stock buyers of his brokerage firm (A&E Networks Television). Though his lavish spending and berserk party lifestyle was consumed by excessive greed, he displayed both positive and negative aspects of business communications.

    Read More

  • The WorldCom Accounting Scandal

    1587 Words  | 4 Pages

    Sandberg, J., Solomon, D., & Blumenstein, R. (2002, June 27). Accounting Spot-Check Unearthed A Scandal in WorldCom's Books. Retrieved from The Wall Street Journal: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB102512901721030520.html

    Read More

  • Insider trading

    614 Words  | 2 Pages

    This case illustrated that there were real consequences to white collar crime. In addition to paying the fifty million dollar fine, he relinquished another fifty million dollars of his illegal trading profits. (He still had millions remaining, however, from his illegal gains.) His actual prison sentence was three years, yet he served only twenty-two months in the federal prison at Lompoc, California, which was known to have a “country-club” atmosphere.

    Read More

  • The Wolf of Wall Street

    1300 Words  | 3 Pages

    Jordan Belfort is the notorious 1990’s stockbroker who saw himself earning fifty million dollars a year operating a penny stock boiler room from his Stratton Oakmont, Inc. brokerage firm. Corrupted by drugs, money, and sex, he went from being an innocent twenty – two year old on the fringe of a new life to manipulating the system in his infamous “pump and dump” scheme. As a stock swindler, he would motivate his young brokers through insane presentations to rile them up as they defrauded investors with duplicitous stock sales. Toward the end of this debauchery tale he was convicted for securities fraud and money laundering for which he was sentenced to twenty – two months in prison as well as recompensing two – hundred million in restitution to any swindled stock buyers of his brokerage firm. Though his lavish spending and berserk party lifestyle was consumed by excessive greed, he displayed both positive and negative aspects of business communications.

    Read More

  • Tyco Case Study

    2321 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Tyco accounting scandal is an ideal illustration of how individuals who hold key positions in an organization are able to manipulate accounting practices and financial reports for personal gain. The few key individuals involved in the Tyco Scandal (CEO Kozlowski and CFO Swartz), used a number of clever and unique tactics in order to accomplish what they did; including spring loading, manipulating their ‘key-employee loan’ program, and multiple ‘hush money’ payouts.

    Read More

More about Birkenfeld Case

Open Document