More handpicked essays just for you.
Genetics vs environment criminal behavior
Genetics vs environment criminal behavior
Genetics vs environment criminal behavior
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Genetics vs environment criminal behavior
Question 2: Biological perspectives can be useful in many aspects when explaining criminal activity. Often times an individual’s genes and socialization influences are the focus of explaining criminal behavior. Hereditary traits can influence conditions such as antisocial behavior causing one to participate in criminal activity (Wilson & Scarpa, 2012). However, if the environment is one in such no wrong doing or criminal activity is present, then the individual within that environment will be less likely to commit a wrong doing. When there is evidence of substance abuse within a family environment, the chances of other family members using or abusing drugs, alcohol, and participating in criminal activity is greater unless the environment
Wilson, Jim. Criminal Genes. Popular Science. Pars International Corp. New York, NY. November 12, 2002. http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/research/1282176.html
Nature vs. nurture has been one of the oldest and most debated topics among psychologists over the years. This concept discusses whether a child is born into this world with their developmental work cut out for them or if a child is a “blank slate” and their experiences are what shape them into who they are. Over the years and plenty of research, psychologists have all mostly come to agree that it’s a little bit of both. Children are both born with some genetic predispositions while other aspects of the child’s development are strongly influenced by their surrounding environment. This plays into the criminal justice system when discussing where criminal behavior stems from. Is a criminal’s anti-social behavior just part of their DNA or is it a result of their upbringing? The answer to this question is not definite. Looking at research a strong argument can be made that criminals developed their anti-social patterns through the atmosphere in which they were raise, not their DNA.
1. Cesare Lombroso applied the methods of natural science (observation, measurement, experimentation, statistical analysis) to the study of criminal behavior. Lombroso rejected the classical theory of crime, associated with Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham, which explained criminal activity as freely chosen behavior based on the rational calculation of benefit and loss, pleasure and pain. Critically analyze both schools of thought and provide an opinion as to what theory you believe is more relevant.
The most vivid example of the biological determinism is the theory of Cesare Lombroso. Lombroso based his theory on the assumption that criminals have certain physiognomic features or abnormalities. Lombroso wanted to be able to detect future criminals in order to isolate them from the society. This gave criminology a strong push to create new methods of dealing with criminals and prevent crimes. Lombroso implied that prisoners had common facial characteristics. If to exaggerate criminals in Lombroso’s theory can be identified through the shape of their skulls, asymmetry of the face and head, large cheekbones, ears and lips, long arms and a twisted nose. Lombroso’s theory is the oldest one and it can without a doubt be called the main background data for the whole process of the development of criminology. Lombroso stated that men are more inclined to commit crimes due to the conservatism and the narrow-mindedness of their interests. According to Lombroso women have less social contacts and this is what predetermines their conservatism. Thi...
Trait theory views criminality as a product of abnormal biological or psychological traits. It is based on a mix between biological factors and environmental factors. Certain traits alone cannot determine criminality. We are born with certain traits and these traits along with certain environmental factors can cause criminality (Siegel, 2013). According to (Siegel, 2013), the study of sociobiology sparked interest in biological or genetic makeup as an explanation for crime and delinquency. The thought is that biological or genetic makeup controls human behavior, and if this is true, then it should also be responsible for determining whether a person chooses crime or conventional behavior. This theory is referred to as trait theory (Siegel, 2013). According to Siegel (2013), due to the fact that offenders are different, one cannot pinpoint causality to crime to just a single biological or psychological attribute. Trait theorist looks at personal traits like intelligence, personality, and chemical and genetic makeup; and environmental factors, such as family life, educational attainment, economic factors, and neighborhood conditions (Siegel, 2013). There are the Biosocial Trait theories an...
Within the past decade there has been a wide range of research and evidence available based on both sides of the nature or nurture debate. Along with further research that identifies a number of determinants that have some form of influence towards criminal behavior and activity. This researc...
Some people believe that criminal behavior is based upon and individual upbringing and life experience (nurture), others believe that this behavior is part of a person’s genetic makeup (nature). Scientists have been debating about nature v. nurture for decades. Nurture proponents propose that environmental factors are a key component in the development of criminal behavior. Naturalist on the other hand proposes that criminal behavior can be inherited like a person’s height or eye color from their parents or ancestors.
Biological focuses on the relationship between how criminality traits can be hugely influenced by the environment and heredity. In contrast, biological approaches pay attention to the biological factors that impact delinquent behaviours (Anderson, 2014). Earlier positivist criminologists were known for their theory of “born criminals” as they were greatly inspired by Darwin and his theory of evolution. Biological approach demonstrates that genetics play a vital part in the influence of behaviour.
In conclusion it is shown through examinations of a average criminals biological makeup is often antagonized by a unsuitable environment can lead a person to crime. Often a criminal posses biological traits that are fertile soil for criminal behavior. Some peoples bodies react irrationally to a abnormal diet, and some people are born with criminal traits. But this alone does not explain their motivation for criminal behavior. It is the environment in which these people live in that release the potential form criminal behavior and make it a reality. There are many environmental factors that lead to a person committing a crime ranging from haw they were raised, what kind of role models they followed, to having a suitable victims almost asking to be victimized. The best way to solve criminal behavior is to find the source of the problem but this is a very complex issue and the cause of a act of crime cannot be put on one source.
L., (2011). A Primer on Crime & Delinquency (3rd Ed.). Belmont, CA Wadsworth Cengage Learning. p. 42. Retrieved November 29, 2017, from https://www.betheluniversityonline.net/cps/default.aspx?SectionID=5980&tabid=
They also explore the myths about the connection between genetic factors and criminal behavior. The first myth they looked at was “Identifying the Role of Genetics in Criminal Behavior Implies That There Is a “Crime Gene.”” This myth is dismissed because of the unlikelihood that that a single gene is responsible for criminal behavior. The second myth they look at is “Attributing Crime to Genetic Factors is Deterministic.” This myth is also easily dismissed because of the fact that just because someone has a predisposition to a certain behavior doesn’t mean that the person will take on that behavior.
Additionally, violent criminal behaviour is inherent in parents of criminals (Lyons 2007). The twin study is a study of a group of identical twins, which had either both or a single parent with a criminal background or record (Kendler et al. 2014). Each identical twin within a pair were adopted and raised in different households since birth (Kendler et al. 2014). The study of twins allowed the researcher to distinguish which behaviours are the cause of nurture (upbringing) and what are the result of nature (genetic makeup) (Connolly & Beaver 2013; Lyons 2007). The sets of twins were assessed for similarities and differences among their behaviours (Kendler et al. 2014). The results revealed that despite the up bringing in separate households the twins possessed very similar behaviours and later followed their biological parents in obtaining a criminal record in adulthood (Kendler et al. 2014). This finding proves that criminal nature is hereditary and can be inherent through generations. Additionally a documentary, My Brother the Serial Killer, based on the serial killer Glen Rogers, supports the belief that criminal and aggressive behaviours is genetic and not caused by external environmental factors (Monaghan 2012). In this case the brother of Glen Rogers speaks out about the crimes and the arrest of his serial killer brother (Monaghan 2012). What is interesting to observe in this documentary that both Glen’s sister and brother did not display extreme violent nature like Glen had, although they were raised in same household. This behavioural difference can be understood by genetic variations or mutations that Glen possessed and his siblings did not. Overall, the twin study and Glen prove that our genes predispose our
There are more contemporary biological theories that have since developed. However, most are still nearly impossible to prove true; for example, the genetic theory of crime in fraternal and identical twins. This study is supposed to provide evidence that those who are born with the same genetically heritable trait are more prone to crime than fraternal twins or siblings because of the ...
TANNENBAUN, B, (2007),Profs link criminal behaviour to genetics [online] , Available at: http://thedp.com/index.php/article/2007/11/profs_link_criminal_behavior_to_genetics [accessed 16th October 2011].
Different schools of thought propose varying theoretical models of criminality. It is agreeable that criminal behaviour is deep rooted in societies and screams for attention. Biological, Social ecological and psychological model theories are key to helping researchers gain deeper comprehension of criminal behaviour and ways to avert them before they become a menace to society. All these theories put forward a multitude of factors on the outlooks on crime. All these theories have valid relevancy to continuous research on criminal behaviour.