Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Mughal empire essay introduction
Advent of the mughals- history
Mughal empire 1526-1556 AD
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Mughal empire essay introduction
Mughal Emperor Akbar, full name- Abu’l Fath Jalal ud-din Muhammad Akbar, was the third King of the Mughal Empire. He was born on 14th October 1556 in a Rajput Fortress in Umarkot, Sind. Regarded by many historians as the greatest Mughal ruler, he succeeded in almost all of his campaigns and was widely favored among the common people. He was a tolerant, fair and most importantly very intelligent ruler. Akbar learned that the success of being a great leader is not to infuse fear into his enemy but to rather compromise and resolve the matter without a shed of blood. However, his peaceful ways not always worked, he had a well-organized army that he used to lead himself and was a great warrior. Akbar is not only known for his contribution to the expansion of the Mughal Empire but he is also known to initiate the splendid legacy of Mughal art and architecture. He found the solution for ever-lasting Hindu-Muslim conflicts that made not only him a widely acceptable leader, but even his descendants who continued his legacy until the end of the Dynasty.
Akbar’ grandfather Babar was the founder of Mughal Empire, who after his failure to conquer Samarkand set his eyes to conquer India. Originally from the city of Andijan in contemporary Uzbekistan, he marched on to India after he conquered Kabul. Babur expressed his desire in his memoir Bāburnāma in these words, "My desire for Hindustan had been constant. It was in the month of Shaban, the Sun being in Aquarius, that we rode out of Kabul for Hindustan" (1). He conquered northwestern part of India after he defeated and killed Ibrahim Lodi, the then emperor of India under the Lodi Dynasty, in the historical Battle of Panipat. Babur wrote in his memoirs about his victory, "By the grac...
... middle of paper ...
... Dirk Collier states in an interview with Times Of India, ‘Akbar faced the same difficulty as the one we are facing in today's world: he ruled over a vast, extremely diverse empire, inhabited by people of countless many creeds, castes and ethnic origins. As a matter of principle, but also for pragmatic, "imperialist" reasons, he wanted them to be united – if not in brotherhood, then at least in mutual respect and harmony.’ (4). Akbar had a loyal following, after the defeat of Rajput rulers, he allied with the Rajput and instead of demanding a high “tribute tax” and leaving them with their territories unsupervised, he integrated them into his empire and formed a centralized government to rule over. This practice brought stability to his empire and his rules and sovereignty was embraced by Non-Muslims and Muslims. He abolished Jizya tax in 1562 but reinstated in 1575.
Akbar was considered the best of the Mughal rulers partly because of his tolerance of all religions. Akbar did his best to unify the Hindus and Muslims by giving both religions positions in the government. Traditionally, only Muslims would could be rulers zamindars while most of the population was Hindu. Akbar also married women of both religions, as an attempt to unify Hindus and Muslims. Akbar himself was interested in religions, inviting different people to discuss other religions with him. Akbar's greatest impact in trying to unite the Hindus and Muslims was creating the Divine Faith religion, but most people did not convert. When Akbar died, the following rulers did not support the same religious tolerance policy that he had. Aurangzeb tried to rid the empire of all Hindu. This caused revolts from both Hindus and Muslims, which created a period of instability allowing Europeans to come and take
Napoleon was an emperor, military officer, husband, and father to many. He ruled France before being exiled and lived a long life, leaving behind a lasting legacy and impression that most people will not forget.
Weatherford, J. McIver. Genghis Khan and the making of the modern world. New York: Crown, 2004.
The Ghazi thesis was used by the Ottomans as well and it is based on the idea of a “holy war” against the infidels. The Ottomans were religion based and they went along with “Jihad in the path of God” which meant that they were fighting for God. Their goal in the beginning was to strive to be a more pious Muslim community. Like mentioned before, some Mughal rulers did not put religion as their top reason to conquer. Babur was more of a one of a kind ruler, “No Ottomans, sultans or conquerors, are known to have been as openly frank as the Mughal found Babur, who in his Turki-language autobiography explains that he left Kabul for India to satisfy his mulkgirliq, his "kingdom-seizing" or imperial ambitions” (Dale 56). Babur was open with the fact that he was more “power hungry” when he conquered than a follower of the Ghazi
With power that he received and the entire area completely conquered, he the continued his work and managed the government. He favored the instillation of several missions. Introduced traded of new plants, promoted cotton, and publicized Indian
Charlemagne also known as Charles the Great, created a legacy that is greatly honored still to this day. He is seen as one of the greatest conquerors ever because of territories he conquered, the diversity he created, and the building of one of the greatest empires known to mankind. Since the fall of Rome, most of the continent of Europe has not been ruled by someone, until Charlemagne came along. Charlemagne was the founder of the Holy Roman Empire and was the one person to practically lead Europe out of the Dark Ages.
Adolf Hitler, said to be one of the most evil political leaders who ever lived, killed a total of six million people just because they were Jewish. Also he killed millions more just because they were not German even though Hitler was one of the most evil political leaders who ever lived; he was also one of the most impressive leaders who have ever lived. Hitler was one of the most powerful leaders in the world, because he changed Germany in ways others couldn’t and still can’t do till this day. Also Adolf Hitler was one of the best public speakers, he had a big influence on his followers, and he expanded Germany. With those points Adolf Hitler became one of the best leaders and he took over a regime single handedly.
anyone, trust no one but yourself and if you must go your own way then
Historian R.S. Kanungo praising all the aspects of the Kingdom of Maharaja Ranjit Singh, in his writings says, "his empire was the kingdom for 'Welfare for All', in which all were equal sharing partners. In his kingdom there was no special love for Sikhs and no animosity for non-Sikhs. There were no special taxes on any caste to show it down from the other or to label it inferior."
Napoleon Bonaparte was an interesting ruler in that he was compromised of attributes of both a tyrant and a hero. Napoleon had a strong following throughout his reign and even during his two exiles. He was the emperor of France between 1799 and 1815, following the fall of the Directory. Despite the efforts of the French Revolution to rid the country of an autocratic ruler, Bonaparte came to power as Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte I in 1804. He claimed that he preserved the goals of the Revolution, which can be easily argued as his rule became more dictatorial as it progressed. Despite his departure from some of the gains of the Revolution, he overall was a hero for the French people. Through his military ventures, political changes and social reform, Napoleon proved himself as a hero. This is not to say that there were aspects of his reign that were tyrannical, but he was overall beneficial for France.
Genghis Khan showed early promise of becoming both a leader and a fighter. Through the whole of his childhood upbringing Temujin was exposed to an array of extremely violent, unpredicta...
The Indian garrison at Delhi joined the mutineers and proclaimed Bahadur Shah, the titular Mughal emperor as their leader.The capture of Delhi turned the mutiny into a wide-spread revolt. But the leaders were not united, because they sought to revive former Hindu and Muslim regimes, which traditionally had been opposed to each other.
privileged position to observe the functioning of the Mughal court. His account is a valuable source of
The British invasion formed into a historical development of British colonialism in India. Despite India under the British rule, Mahatma Gandhi played an important role in gaining Independence. He not only changed India but also strongly fought for India's independence, using various strategies. The British Empire ruled as long as they could to reform India both politically and socially.
Napoleon Bonaparte is one of the most famous figures in French history for the importance of his internal reforms. However, he remains primarily in global memory as one of the greatest military commanders in history. Indeed, Napoleon Bonaparte delivered more battles than Alexander the Great, Hannibal, or Caesar. His campaigns covered all Europe from Spain to Russia, without forgetting the East with Egypt and Syria. The French Emperor entered the prestigious capitals of Europe, Milan, Vienna (twice), Berlin, Madrid and Moscow.