Biblical View of Creation

2535 Words6 Pages

The Documentary Theory holds that the Pentateuch was composed or compiled from several different documents or traditions written by several different authors. These original documents were argued to favor different styles and names for God, and thus were written by different authors. One document might favor “Elohim,” while another might favor “YHWH.” These sources are generally argued to be source J, E, P, and D. Genesis, however, only shows traces of J, E, and P. Some have even further subdivided the four primary sources. However, this theory fails to adequately explain the origin of the Pentateuch. Religious documents of the ancient Near East were not complied in this way, nor are variations in style and word choice conclusive. Dating the different documents is extremely difficult and far too subjective to prove the Documentary Theory.1

Spinoza questioned mosaic authorship of the Pentateuch and developed what is known as “higher criticism.” This is a form of internal analysis.2 Spinoza argued that the Pentateuch was compiled from several documents, some of which were Mosaic.3 Astruc went a step further and actually singled out two sources, one which preferred the divine name “Elohim,” and the other preferring “YHWH.”4

Davis refuted this theory based on several factors. First, no other Ancient Near Eastern religious document is known to have compiled in this way. Isolating sources based on divine names is an extremely insubstantial practice. Davis points out that the author of Genesis might well have chosen certain divine names over others at certain points because of theological emphasis, rather than due to source documents. Second, it is irrational to argue the Document Theory based on differences on style. As Davis notes...

... middle of paper ...

...clares it very good.39 This small change in the formula indicates that humanity was the crowning glory of creation.

Bibliography

Davis, John J. Paradise to Prison. Salem: Sheffield Pub Co, 1998.

Phillips, Scott. “Genesis: Introduction.” Liberty University. http://bb7.liberty.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_1504533_ (accessed June 28, 2011).

Ham, Ken. “What About the Gap and Ruin-Reconstruction Theories?” www.answersingenesis.org. http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/gap-ruin-reconstruction-theories (accessed June 29, 2011).

Waltke, Bruce K., and Cathi J. Fredricks. Genesis: A Commentary. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2001.

Walton, John H. Chronological and Background Charts of the Old Testament (Zondervan Charts). Revised ed. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan, 1994.

Open Document