Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The value of tradition
Although a completely comprehensive and accurate analysis is impossible given the limitations of summarizing from outside of the cultures, languages, evolution of faith, geographic locations and original timelines from Creation to the first century, some scholarly generalizations serve as an appropriate framework at this time. The NIV Archaeological Study Bible provides a simple timeline with Creation, The Flood and the Tower of Babel occurring sometime before 2166 B.C. In addition, the timeline lists the years of the significant forefathers of faith as: Abraham (c. 2166-1991 B.C), Isaac (c. 2066-1886 B.C.), Jacob (c. 2006-1859 B.C.), and Joseph (c. 1915-1805 B.C.). Furthermore, this study Bible notes that Moses, the probable author of Genesis …show more content…
Although aspects of tradition were again changed dramatically, Passover continues to be observed to this day. Klawans goes into great detail in his article reviewing the works of many known scholars and showing how they may be reliable in documenting culture at the time, they do not give an account of how Passover was observed by Jesus. He concludes, “Thus, the Passover Seder as we know it developed after 70 C.E. I wish we could know more about how the Passover meal was celebrated before the Temple was destroyed. But unfortunately, our sources do not answer this question with any certainty.” Considering the thorough review by Klawans, it appears there is not a lot more that can be researched at this time to confirm or deny his conclusions. Stein, on the other hand, appears quite confident that Jesus observed several of the traditions, including the number of people present, specific elements at the table, and the tradition of explaining the symbolism. However, Stein does not clarify if his descriptions of Passover are modern, during Jesus’ time, or dating back to before participants made the pilgrimage to Jerusalem. Also, to Klawans’ point, there is no proof of how closely Jesus and his disciples observed the Passover traditions. Therefore, in understanding the Lord’s Supper passage in context, one needs to be careful not to heavily compare to existing traditions beyond what is described in
Coogan, Michael David., Marc Zvi. Brettler, Carol A. Newsom, and Pheme Perkins. "Genesis." The New Oxford Annotated Bible: With the Apocrypha. New York: Oxford UP, 2010. Print.
The Old Testament of the Bible, which includes the Book of Genesis, was also passed down through oral tradition before the Hebrews wrote it down from 1000-300 B.C. Both of these documents express the religious attitudes of these people as their story of the creation of the world and of humankind unfolds.
The Documentary Theory holds that the Pentateuch was composed or compiled from several different documents or traditions written by several different authors. These original documents were argued to favor different styles and names for God, and thus were written by different authors. One document might favor “Elohim,” while another might favor “YHWH.” These sources are generally argued to be source J, E, P, and D. Genesis, however, only shows traces of J, E, and P. Some have even further subdivided the four primary sources. However, this theory fails to adequately explain the origin of the Pentateuch. Religious documents of the ancient Near East were not complied in this way, nor are variations in style and word choice conclusive. Dating the different documents is extremely difficult and far too subjective to prove the Documentary Theory.1
The teaching of the Bible should shape the church’s views on humanity. However, the teaching of the church should not be oblivious of the naturalist explanations of the important issues concerning Anthropology, because Christianity makes bold truth claims about the origin of humanity. It has to face the counter-claims with a fair consideration of their merits. For example the antiquity of humanity has been taken for granted for many years until only recently with the challenges coming from natural sciences. This forces Christians to re-evaluate their claims in order to reconcile what they have always believed with the new findings in science. In response, Christians have either rejected all anthropological data, or argued for the non-historical nature of the text of the Bible, or tried to reconcile biblical information with the scientific data.
The questions about the existence of life and the creation of the world are always mind-boggling and fascinating, however, the real answer to these questions may never surface. All there is to rely on are the myths, stories and legends passed on from generation to generation by ancestors and the clues they have left. This essay will try to uncover the ancient Mesopotamian and Hebrew views on existence and creation by looking at sources like the Genesis and other ancient Mesopotamian texts and poems. Mesopotamians and Hebrews had contrasting views on how they explained the events in their lives, and through analysis of ancient sources, those differences will be outlined. In such populated and booming areas, human conflict was inevitable and some of the law codes that were placed in effect to establish order within the society will be examined. Throughout it all, god and religion played a central role in these ancient civilizations.
Every ancient society and civilization has creation myths that were passed down and keep alive throughout the passing of time by word of mouth. These myths are the world’s oldest stories and are vital to these cultures because they explain their beginnings and give purpose to their existence. By analyzing and interpreting different creation myths it becomes easier to understand different cultures and their connections and relationships with heir beliefs and god(s).
In the chapter of genesis, the creation story of the bible, the first man and woman had been created in the likeness of God within the Garden of Eden; along with a diversity of animals that would co-exist under the dominion of the “first ever” recorded human beings. However, the question remains; where had this elusive Garden of Eden been located? Was it an actual physical location on this earth, or was it otherworldly? Perhaps, the answer will be uncovered within the ruins of Gobekli Tepe, the oldest known Neolithic site known to humankind. There are many points of correlation between the story of Genesis and the data unearthed at Gobekli Tepe, such as how both are coincidently the origin of religion and culture, both widely emphasize the symbol of the snake, and most importantly, both regard the human being as superior to the animal. Gobekli Tepe, a site located in Turkey, appears to be the origin of human culture, which dates at 12,000 years ago, a time when humans were hunter-gatherers that did not settle in one place for too long, and had discovered stone tools and fire. The nomadic people of Anatolia had managed to create a spectacular site that had been the revolutionary point that served as an introduction to religion and the “supernatural.” What convinced many scholars to view Gobekli Tepe as an early place of worship had been the many temples that had been discovered; however, most of them remain unearthed. There is convincing evidence that these ruins did not serve as permanent shelter for the Neolithic people of Anatolia, but rather as a point turning point that defined the human being. There is an opposite school of thought, however, ...
Kohn, Risa Levitt, and Rebecca Moore. A Portable God: The Origin of Judaism and Christianity. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2007. Print.
Scholars have shifted from the notion that the Bible differs from other ancient Near Eastern literature, cultures, and religions. If this were so, the Bible would be considered a myth. In this chapter Oswalt gives descriptions to what a myth is and gives insight into whether it is acceptable to label the Bible as a myth. Since the 1960s, scholars have been stating that the attributes of the Bible and its contemporary belief system have more in common to a myth even though the data used to make these claims have remained the same.
Jesus was the lamb at the meal along with every celebration that the Mass has since. “By celebrating the Last Supper with his apostles in the course of the Passover meal, Jesus gave the Jewish Passover its definitive meaning. Jesus' passing over to his father by his death and Resurrection, the new Passover, is anticipated in the Supper and celebrated in the Eucharist, which fulfills the Jewish Passover and anticipates the final Passover of the Church in the glory of the kingdom.(CCC 1340)”
St. Luke identifies this last supper of the LORD Jesus with the apostles as a Passover meal that commemorates the deliverance of the Israelites from slavery in Egypt. But the LORD Jesus reinterprets the significance of the Passover in light of its fulfilment in the kingdom of GOD. The fact that the apostles are alone with the LORD Jesus suggests that this event is of particular significance for the church, of which the apostles are the foundation. It is at this meal that the LORD Jesus institutes the Sacrament of the Holy Eucharist or Holy Communion, and the Sacrament of Holy Orders or the Sacerdotal Priesthood for the Church. St. Luke reports that the LORD Jesus earnestly desired to eat this Passover meal with His disciples.
Passover and Exodus explains the promise god made to Abram he will restore blessing to his children and the next generation. Passover is the time god decided that he will never his suffer again. Passover was made for a sacrifice to god and even Jesus had a Passover before he died for our sin to be forgiven. After my reading from the Jewish ADONAI spoke to Moshe and Aharon in the of Egypt. God told them to begin your calendar with this month. Speak to all the assembly of Israel and say on the tenth day of this month each man is take a lamb or kid for his family one per household except that if the household is too small for a whole lamb or kid, then he and next door neighbor should share one, dividing it in proportion to the number of people
LaSor, W., Hubbard, D., Bush, F., & Allen, L. (1996). Old Testament survey: The message, form, and background of the Old Testament (2nd ed.). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans
While the Hebrews and Egyptians creation theories bear resemblances and differences, the study and comparison of both the Egyptian myths and the biblical account allow us to comprehend the religious views of ancient civilizations in a better light. One may come to the conclusion that the Hebrews were influenced by the cultures of Egyptians by creating similarities in their own beliefs, or by drawing a line of defense of what is in their terms true, by separating from the mass ideals of the Egyptians and establishing distinct
Documentary hypothesis says that there were several authors who wrote first five books of the Bible. In my essay I will try to discuss J, P, and E - authors of Genesis, Exodus and Numbers. I must admit that all these authors had lived after the division of the kingdom.