Bi-Bi: A Better Way to Educate the Deaf

2295 Words5 Pages

In America we have adopted an auditory-speech, which is a mono-linguistic focus on the spoken and written forms of the majority (English here) language, approach to educating our deaf children. We adopted this methodology for teaching the deaf because of the Milan Conference held in 1880. This conference was an excuse for those in favor of oralism to gain the support they needed to outlaw the use of signed language in education. Their plot succeeded; the conference decided that signed language was inferior to spoken languages and was not capable of allowing the kind of learning necessary (Lane, Hoffmeister, and Bahan 61). From this stemmed many of the false beliefs about signed language. Such as signed language will make the signer stupid, it will interfere with learning spoken language, and it is not an actual language. Thanks to many research studies done in the last 40 years these misconceptions have been disproved. We have learned that there is a better way of educating our deaf students: Bicultural-Bilingual (bi-bi) educational methods. Some of the consequences of the Milan Conference include the banning of the use of signed languages in the classroom and making it so deaf could not educate other deaf. Which eliminated the blossoming bilingual education programs that were starting to emerge. Now that the use of signed language was taboo in classrooms the auditory-speech method of teaching became the only way. Which puts us in the sad state of education of the deaf we are in today. Because of the focus on speech and spoken language many other aspects of education are overlooked and not understood by a deaf student. So now we have an educational system that forces deaf students to try to learn using a language th... ... middle of paper ... ...al of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 13.2 (2010): 133-45. Web. Knooks, Henry. "Measuring the Quality of Education: the Involvement of Bilingually Educated Deaf Children." American Annals of the Deaf 145.3 (2000): 268-74. Web. Lane, Harlan, Robert Hoffmeister, and Ben Bahan. A Journey into the Deaf-world. San Diego, CA: DawnSignPress, 1996. Print. Mann, Wolfgang, and Chloe R. Marshall. "Building an Assessment Use Argument for Sign Language: the BSL Nonsense Sign Repetition Test." International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 13.2 (2010): 243-58. Web. Prbanic, Ljubica. "Sign Language and Deaf Education." Sign Language & Linguistics 2nd ser. 9.1 (2006): 233-54. Web. Snoddon, Kristin. "American Sign Language and Early Intervention." The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes 64.4 (2008): 581-604. Web.

Open Document